So the obvious thing i’ve missed is i could know AutoCAD like the back of my hand but its useless with no qualifications/knowledge/experience in the industry im using it in.
Not always true.
I learnt Autocad at Uni as part of a degree in something else. I went on to enhance my Cad knowledge by doing a HND. I had little or no experience of Civils/Railway bridges when I got my first contract with British Rail. I then moved over the structural sector and whilst a lot of my knowledge was transferable most of what I was doing was new. Again, when I decided to move over to Telecoms sector, I was going in blind (I’ve been in coms now for the past 16 years). Learn Autocad well and youll always get a job doing something, regardless of experience (allthough it helps!).
As for Revit, It will undoubtedly take over in the Structural, civil and architectural world eventually – I cant see it happening in my sector (telecoms – just no need). Autocad will be around for a while yet.
Learn Revit as well once you’ve got AutoCad under your belt – you can charge a lot more per hour as a Revit user than as an Autocad user! 😀 .
My main client at the mo would be more interested in employing a proficient Cad user, rather than one who has had previous sector related experience. (theres been some real dross coming through claiming they can use Cad and soon being found out)
As for this:
get rid of the CAD Monkeys
Have you not seen planet of the apes – we’ll take over eventually! 😉