Leaving aside HUGE assumptions which I’ll ignore, this point about price and product development mboy raises is interesting. Out of interest why do you think Orange don’t invest in product development? They may not but I’m fairly sure they have played with other suspension systems, for me the fact that they continue with a proven system is reassuring. Is it perfect, no, but neither is any other, and I’d rather spend my money on simple bomb proof design than filling the pockets of expensive research departments who spend all their time fiddeling… only for the marketing and sales team to take the latest fiddel to market and tell us it’s the next big thing – this year. Poor argument IMO.
As for being expensive, Orange charge what the market will wear, if you think it’s too steep go buy something else and be happy, but for those of us who get it the cost is worth it 😀
I’ll admit I nearly fell into the ‘big brand’ trap and buy based on market penetration, but then I tested five bikes. The Orange won. How many people can honestly say they tested several bikes before buying? In the wider market not many I’d guess. When it comes to replacing mine I’ll do it all again, and I my buy a DWRVPP4BARHORSTYLINKYTHING then, but right now no thanks.
Oh, and David, for those who have strong opinions about the look of Orange bikes I’m curious as to what they decided to spend money on – I’d like to see what’s so much better looking about their choices, no more. I’ll admit there are better looking bikes out there, but I didn’t buy my five because it was pretty I bought it because it’s bloody good fun to ride.
Here’s mine…
I would like to see members own ‘better’ looking bikes… It’s all immaterial but fun all the same isn’t it…