I’m against the project, especially so with the ever rising costs going into the realm of beyond ridiculous (a tenth of a trillion??). There are valid arguments on both sides but I just don’t believe it’s the right thing to prioritise now.
As has been said time and time again, *most* people in Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, Newcastle etc and the surrounding areas want to be able to travel between those places more efficiently and if there is only enough political will to spend on doing that or on building HS2 at one given time, I think most would say they’d rather have improved local links *first*.
Some of the mistakes HS2 Ltd have made are embarrassing and naive, things like forgetting that 6 miles of tightly packed underground pipework, cabling, networks, water and gas supplies under West London would need moved first to build the tunnel section. It can be tens of millions just to redirect one major fibre optic cable in a densely populated city like London.
Things like passing risk onto contractors therefore getting very high prices back for work packages then realising it was better to take the risk off them but only years into the project.
Failing to appreciate that house and land prices rise over time and not compulsory purchasing everything on the route as soon as possible has meant the cost of that has risen astronomically.