Why did you put £50 as a ‘best offer’ if you were prepared to offer £54?
Seriously?
Semi, and semi- tongue-in-cheek.
My initial response was to adrec who said
i had one the other week, a set of cranks posted at £55 or best offer, so offered £50, i thought fairly, they rejected, so i offered £53, rejected, £54, rejected.
why put it on sale as ‘or best offer’
and they kept rejecting his ‘best offer’ because he kept going back, showing that the £50 (or £53) wasn’t actually his best offer after all, because he kept making a better one. Hence my comment.
There is an art to negotiation and when done right doesn’t end up as just reaching the halfway point between your first offer and the original price. But keeping going back and upping the offer to end up at the asking price isn’t it (although the other fella played his hand pretty nigh perfectly)
(look, really I know that best offer on ebay as IRL doesn’t really mean best offer, it’s a negotiating point, but the protest seemed to be ‘why did you say you’d take offers if then you didn’t – and the answer to that bit is as above, because adrec got outnegotiated)
Go on then, Sir Alan, tell me what i should have done rather than offering below the asking price. refuse to budge and miss out on something for the sake of £1?
my point was, he wasnt prepared to take an offer, he wanted the full asking price, yet clicked the ‘or best offer button’ when setting up. ‘or best offer’ as far as i can tell is Ebay speak for ‘open to negotiation’, and that clearly was not the case.
iirc it was getting towards then end of the auction anyway, so i really dont know what more this fella wanted.