But that’s a lot of words, some attempting to be big, that basically bake down to:
1. God (as the author defines it) is inherent to the universe.
2. You define gods by their place in nature (taxonomy).
3. A side kick at non-believers in the same vein that believers complain about getting from non-believers.
4. If gods exist then we haven’t yet found a way so we can only investigate by logic or experiences.
This is classic strawman. Define your object in (1), knock down the options you don’t like in (3) and (4) leaving you with what you want.
0/10 do better next time Mr Hart.
He also didn’t consider Buddhism or the multi-god religions. If we’re talking about religion you can’t just cherry pick *which* god you’re talking about, there’s loads of others too that must be explained or dismissed.