Or, show a kid a rocket boosted jet car, give them one of those flashing LED christmas tree decorations to solder,
Completely true, only what bloodhound is showing kids is finite element analysis, mathematical models on what’s got better aerodynamics for the application etc.
It’s very important to get kids inspired and interested but in the same way the apollo missions no doubt inspired a load of kids, if you spent the next ten months with a 9 year-old kid showing them how you decided which heat resistant tile to use you’d not inspire them.
Bloodhound has been running since 2008, so longer than that 9 year-old kid has been alive, it’s not going to complete anytime soon even with funding and it’s way over budget, that’s not inspiring, gods that’s the big whine we all have about government everything.
Think back to your chemistry classes, what inspired you more, titration for days on end or sticking hydrogen and chlorine in a jar and flashing a camera bulb at them? Pouring mercury on aluminum or watching a nail rust in selection of jars?
Bloodhound is interesting to you because you know the end result will be exciting and 10 years for a project to (then get binned because it’s out of money) produce a result doesn’t seem that bad. You’re interested in the little things, the process etc much more as an adult, as a child of the end result excites you you might (if we’re lucky) investigate further, which builds interest until your doing cold fusion in your garden shed. You don’t try getting kids excited about a fusion rector by bringing them along for the ride from inception to production.
Bloodhound is I’m afraid to say a bunch of “old blokes” doing because-they-can stuff. The car if and when finished might have a bit of wow factor but mainly it’s for big little kids, like a few £100 million lego kit.
Think of it this way – to get a kid interested in rocket science do you (a) show them a rocket launch, (b) explain about the importance of o-rings to shuttle design.