Forum menu
You can only have o...
 

[Closed] You can only have one

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The plane I want is the one there are no pictures of. 😆


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 5:18 pm
Posts: 8396
Full Member
 

Just think where plane development might be now if some hadn't been cancelled.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 5:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

F4 Phantom for me.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 6:29 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I'd have the bottom one, higher resale value.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 6:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Top one is in service and doing good stuff. Bottom one is still ironing our the wrinkles. I also designed one of the bits in the top one.

Now - Typhoon.

5 years time - probably F35 but it would cause me great mental anguish.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 7:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

YF-23 Black Widow(if it wasn't a gate guardian). Supposedly faster and stealthier than the Raptor but lost out due to some clever marketing and politics by the F-22 manufacturer.

Su-35 for me.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 7:06 pm
Posts: 12336
Full Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 8:41 pm
Posts: 2819
Full Member
 

Not enough love for the F-4 Phantom.....or indeed the Lockheed Starfighter. Looked fantastic to my young man eyes.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 8:47 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

I've actually owned 2 jets, this F3 Tornado which I kept at RAF Leeming...

[img] [/img]

I used to let mates have a mooch.

& this old F4G that I had down at Alconbury...

[img] [/img]

(I accidently tore the photo up cos it was amongst some others I was chucking out. Till I realised)


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 8:50 pm
Posts: 13356
Free Member
 

Not enough love for the F-4 Phantom.

The F4 is probably my fave, meanest, nastiest looking jet ever!


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 8:50 pm
Posts: 9205
Full Member
 

In order of planes mentioned in this thread -
SR71 - fastest is fastest
Harrier - VTOL FTW
'Phoon - spangly modern G-mentalist


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 8:55 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The F35 makes the typhoon look old, design wise. Such is the nature of fighter aircraft life cycles.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 9:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

F35, because we make them (well electronics for them anyway)


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No your all wrong

[url= https://s9.postimg.org/g46b0owyn/68272_1492629229.jp g" target="_blank">https://s9.postimg.org/g46b0owyn/68272_1492629229.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

Mmmmmmmmmmmmm hot russian ladies.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 9:21 pm
Posts: 1098
Free Member
 

id take the one that has done the most missions with the highest kill count. people talking about looks!! if some anti aircraft gun was shooting at you why would you care what the thing looked like. you'd be looking the one that can get your ass outta there the fastest and evasive.


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 10:22 pm
Posts: 9205
Full Member
 

Spitfire it is, then. 🙂


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 10:26 pm
Posts: 20985
 

Spitfire it is, then.

Yeah, they’re ok, fun to fly 8)


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 10:32 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I'd have a Concorde.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 10:37 pm
Posts: 1098
Free Member
 

ah ha but how would the spitfire fair nowadays? not too good. something more modern, whats been the latest successful jet?


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 10:52 pm
Posts: 9205
Full Member
 

ah ha but how would the spitfire fair nowadays? not too good. something more modern, whats been the latest successful jet?

How do you define successful?


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 11:06 pm
Posts: 6940
Full Member
 

Baddest-ass of all

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 11:11 pm
Posts: 398
Free Member
 

Vongassit: don't be a flanker....


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 11:12 pm
Posts: 398
Free Member
Posts: 5785
Full Member
 

One of these. But only because there are bits of one to be found in a bog not far from here. Rumour has it there may even be some unaccounted for depleted uranium shells up there too. Not fast, not pretty, but decidedly efficient in what it was designed to do.[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 11:24 pm
Posts: 9112
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mmmmmmmmmmmmm hot russian ladies.

That plane is a) Ukrainian, and b) very, very similar to an F-15.

EDIT: Okay, with respect to point 'b', not as much as I thought.

F-15:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 11:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sukhoi
sukhoi.org/eng
The JSC Sukhoi Company is a major Russian aircraft manufacturer, headquartered in Begovoy District, Northern Administrative Okrug, Moscow, and designs both civilian and military aircraft. It was founded by Pavel Sukhoi in 1939 as the Sukhoi Design Bureau. The Russian government merged Sukhoi with Mikoyan, Ilyushin, Irkut, Tupolev, and Yakovlev as a new company named United Aircraft Corporation.

Maybe not so much on point a either 😉


 
Posted : 19/12/2017 11:41 pm
Posts: 9112
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Point taken! I was thinking of the markings, though... 🙂


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 12:00 am
Posts: 9112
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Oh, and midlifecrashes, good call on [url= https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow ]the Arrow[/url]. Fantastic plane!


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 12:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thats just her best outfit 😀

Hot Ukrainian ladies?

[url= https://s9.postimg.org/620ppnmlb/C7_Ivkd2_Xw_AAHLRJ.jp g" target="_blank">https://s9.postimg.org/620ppnmlb/C7_Ivkd2_Xw_AAHLRJ.jp g"/> [/img][/url]

Ah Miss Monique.


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 12:13 am
Posts: 2622
Full Member
 

If we're adding Sukhoi jets to the options:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 9:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=pondo ][s]Spitfire[/s] Hurricane it is, then.

The Spitfire might have been sexier, but it didn't have the most kills.


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 4:56 pm
Posts: 35074
Full Member
 

Battle of Britain I think you're right aracer, overall WW2, I'd not be so sure


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 5:19 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

the future is pilotless and drone shaped

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/12/2017 5:41 pm
Page 2 / 2