Forum search & shortcuts

What watch is Richa...
 

[Closed] What watch is Richard Hammond wearing on top gear special?

Posts: 1794
Full Member
 

That sort of price range. It looks pretty good, I like the simplicity I've got to say I love the simple styling of the 007 and the Spork above. What are they like toughness wise?

Anything tough but similar looking? Could go to £350ish but also happy to get s/h if there are any reputable sites about.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

[img] http://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/image/Signet/9825835?$detail$ [/img]

£175. Change it to a proper NATO strap, though.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:18 pm
Posts: 1794
Full Member
 

What is that?
Also what is the benefit of the Nato strap?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 10:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only people that need expensive chronographs/diving watches are fighter pilots, civilian/combat divers, special forces types and astronauts. And preferably those who sport 1970's b-movie porn mustaches, so that counts Bear Grylls out in all his flaming queen metroness.

If you're not one of these you're a watch walt.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:01 pm
Posts: 5858
Full Member
 

Just to upset the anti-snobs, anyone know what Clarkson had on last night, it looked lovely, black leather strap and simple face?


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just to upset the anti-snobs, anyone know what Clarkson had on last night, it looked lovely, black leather strap and simple face?

Probably something made from the tears of child blood diamond miners, with a strap made out of a critically endangered lizard.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:06 pm
Posts: 7872
Free Member
 

bwaarp - Member

If you're not one of these you're a watch walt.

Somebody call?

How very dare you? Watch walt? I'll have you know I'm a watch ****er [i]not[/i] a walt! 🙂


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:08 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Of course, [i]every[/i] watch must have the words "commando" on the face 🙄

How, well... How.. Predictable.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only uses for a chronograph on a regular basis are practically all military or aviation related.

Therefore my point stands, it doesn't even have to say "commando" on it.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Double bubble postuble


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:21 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Ahhh yes, but a watch worn by a bloke in the UK [i]must[/i] wear a watch that has been worn by some ex SAS occifer/commando/war'idge/para/slanty beret jockey.

It's in da rules 😆


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😆

I like to carry a fancy pocket knife at all times aswell.

If I'm out of the office, I insist on wearing my combat trousers. I can fill the pockets with tins of bully beef just incase my world ends.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:28 pm
Posts: 11661
Full Member
 

There's a spork on ebay at the minute, [url= http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SEIKO-SRP043K-SPORK-DIVERS-WATCH-AUTOMATIC-200M-BOXED-HIRSCH-LIBERTY-STRAP-/251241384108?pt=UK_Jewelery_Watches_Watches_MensWatches_GL&hash=item3a7f2748ac ]here.[/url]
Very "wantable", i'm not one for watches but that is very nice indeed and plain looking.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only G-Shock that has got me to actually spend money on it:

I'm wearing one of those and I also have a spare, brand new one for sale (work safety award). The LCD is a bit nicer on the newer ones.

Without the digital display I fear Hammond would effectively be wearing a man bracelet. To be able to navigate by sun and watch, it does pay to know what the big and little hand represent.

I quite like my Seiko, but I'd probably have been just as happy with a Skagen.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:52 pm
Posts: 1109
Free Member
 

I've never understood the appeal of flash/expensive watches. Thinking about it, I've not worn a watch for about 10 yrs, and prior to that the most expensive was probably no more than £50.

My ex once took me shopping specifically to get a watch. This was only 2-3 months into dating and she wanted to spend IRO £1000. I just found the whole experience gross as nothing appealed to me + I couldn't see the point in blowing that amount of cash. Was bored after 5 mins but was "encouraged" to keep looking for another couple of hours or so. Needless to say I returned home empty-handed. ATEOTD a watch is a watch FFS.


 
Posted : 11/03/2013 11:57 pm
Posts: 1794
Full Member
 

5 days left and already at £200? Gonna go out my price range by the looks of it.

So anyone know if the 007s are pretty tough? By that I mean very scratch / drop resistant.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:02 am
Posts: 7872
Free Member
 

ATEOTD, a bike is just a bike FFS! Errrrm...... 🙂


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

boblo - Member
ATEOTD, a bike is just a bike FFS! Errrrm......

Oh, don't start with that ridiculous defence.

A bike can be a finely tuned racing machine, at one with the rider. If you want to pose any sort of challenge at your local trail centre, then you need something upto the job at hand.

A watch just tells the time.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:08 am
Posts: 3546
Free Member
 

Just to upset the anti-snobs, anyone know what Clarkson had on last night, it looked lovely, black leather strap and simple face?

Not seen the programme yet, but it might be an Omega Railmaster. Do remember him going on about them a while ago in an article.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A watch just tells the time.

Very few people need a watch to tell the time anymore. The modern purpose of a watch has more to do with fashion than it does function.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:31 am
Posts: 33988
Full Member
 

bwaarp - Member
The only people that need expensive chronographs/diving watches are fighter pilots, civilian/combat divers, special forces types and astronauts. And preferably those who sport 1970's b-movie porn mustaches, so that counts Bear Grylls out in all his flaming queen metroness.

If you're not one of these you're a watch walt.


Deary me, didn't you get enough hugs from your mummy or something? Do grow up. 🙄
The Spork's a very solid watch, quite heavy, but wears light, if you know what I mean. I've got pretty skinny wrists, but it doesn't look over-large on me.
The reason I've bought the G-Shock is that I occasionally have to operate machinery with lots of sharp corners, the last time I turned round and caught my wrist on a sharp machined steel corner with quite a clunk from the watch! No marks on it, but, while I don't mind general 'patination', I don't want to put a deep gouge into it, so a cheap Casio is going to be my 'shoving hands into machinery' watch. 😀


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 12:43 am
Posts: 659
Free Member
 

This Seiko is good value http://wornandwound.com/2011/09/02/review-seiko-5-snzh53-diver-in-blue/

It was available for just over 80 quid on Amazon on Friday


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 1:20 am
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

Count Zero, yup couldn't find any of the seikos-for good reason!

Funnily enough my work watch is the old citizen tough you've pictured above, sans commando logo. Brilliant watch! It was sold to me as the perfect watch to go to war in; it's done two!!


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 4:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have the best kind of watch in the world - it was free. Just goes to proves that time is not always money, it is a 9 year old Victorinox.


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 11:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Very few people need a watch to tell the time anymore.

Really? Why would I fish my phone out of my pocket when I can just glance at my watch?


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 1:10 pm
Posts: 5858
Full Member
 

Thanks breatheasy I'll take a look 🙂


 
Posted : 12/03/2013 6:56 pm
Page 2 / 2