Forum menu
on the front page should be pulled.
I understand times a tough, and support affiliate links and so on, but not keen on seeing you support companies like this.
Poor show.
Great minds, etc
especially as you can't actually go there at the moment to ride...
Are they one of those scammy sites that charge for something you can apply for much cheaper yourself? My eldest fell for one of those a few years ago.
Agreed and agree with IHN’s comment on the article. It’s pretty much the type of spam the mods would remove from the forum
Indeed they are
Not as bad as the ones that Google let sit at the top of their search listings (paid for) that use things like "ESTA", "gov" and "official" in their shifting (and shifty) domain names.
I understand times a tough, and support affiliate links and so on, but not keen on seeing you support companies like this.
To be fair, I see it more as this company supporting STW.
The first comment after the "article" will stop anyone from using the stupid service they offer, but STW will have been paid for the company to advertise either way.
Will be interested in the STW response, I had hoped their ethics were above this to be honest.
Says "Sponsored Feature" right at the top, not sure what the problem is? (Unless that wasn't there when they first published it...)
Ah, now read the comments. Yeah, definitely a bit of a scam then.
[deleted] crossed posts
It's a scam. Pretty poor promoting it like that, sponsored or not. Big error of judgment.
[deleted] crossed posts
My fault, I replied then edited when I saw the comments 🙂
It's an ad.
But this one is an ad you can comment on directly.
Technically they are offering a service for something you can do directly yourself. but some people like to have their hand held. It's not a scam in so far as they deliver. It's also a one stop shop for all visa, ETA and ESTA applications. Some people like to have them all in one place.
Sponsored/Advertorial is an increasingly important means for us to stay in business.
I'd love nothing more that to never run an ad on the site ever again but until we have a lot more revenue coming from the people who use the site that is still a way off. It's edging ever closer though. We are at 45:55 ratio in terms of reader:ad revenues.
It's not a scam, but the ways these services are marketed is very questionable. And yes, it clearly says 'Advertorial' at the top, but I'm assuming STW has some sort of code/guidelines as to what it will/won't accept as ad revenue, and I can't see how this would pass your usually impeccable judgement.
It doesn't pass any sort of giggle test unless you get laughs from causing the less wary to needlessly fork out money for a service they do not need.
It’s not a scam in so far as they deliver.
This particular company may not be a scam, but it's a very scammy/murky area. I fully understand that you need to take ads and sponsored content, you're running a business, but for the sponsored content especially you have to decide if you're allowing something to be sponsored by someone you're comfortable to promote, as you are giving it a certain seal of approval. On this one, I think you've (admittedly, only just) made the wrong decision to accept it.
If the article said ESTA also available here (with link to real site) and outlined the virtues of the e-visa service I wouldn't feel strongly, but as written designed to sell an unnecessary service to those who don't know any better - that is unethical in my book.
Of course it's a scam @stingmered. Here's a US government warning against sites like that - they use the title "ESTA Fraud Warning":
What service do you think that site is offering, other than conning people out of an overpayment?
@Mark - understand your point re revenue, but that article is very manipulative. It is written such that the links take you to the ESTA site - they don't
Dodgy AF, get rid pronto
Disappointed that the business has taken the money for this, but I'm not going to judge the tough decisions businesses are making to get revenue at the moment.
Some can be quick enough to moan about the perceived value of the mag or site subscription at times, well, this is the alternative.
Next question; how much would the Daily Mail need to pay for an Advertorial on STW?
We have just had a team chat in response to your comments. And as a response we've added a big box to the article that contains text from the website of e-visa.co.uk...
e-Visa.co.uk is a professional visa bureau and supports travellers in acquiring a visa for the USA. However, e-Visa.co.uk is in no way part of the US government. It is also possible to directly apply for an ESTA at the US Customs and Border Protection website ($14 per person, via esta.cbp.dhs.gov). In that case, you will be unable to use our support centre, which is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to resolve urgent issues and answer your questions. We also check applications for common mistakes before submitting them. We do this within 72 hours at the latest, but usually within ten minutes after receiving your payment. If we suspect errors or any incompleteness, we will contact you immediately to ensure that your application can still be processed quickly and correctly. Our services have already saved many travellers from major problems during their travels. Should an application be rejected despite our support and verification, we will refund the entire purchase cost (unless an application for an ESTA USA has been rejected for the same traveller before). Read more about our services.
If they come back to us and ask us to remove that we will pull the whole ad and refund them.
Some can be quick enough to moan about the perceived value of the mag or site subscription at times, well, this is the alternative.
yeah, and I'm part of the problem, I guess- been buying since issue 2, but cancelled my last renewal, wasn't in love with a lot of the changes across content and platforms, but still use the site when I feel like it. Maybe need a rethink.
Thumbs up, Mark.
Whilst there's mud flying around I've raise the issue of promoting beer on this site before. I reckon this parargraph from your Singletrack Flowy Ale Trail beer:
This is the first Singletrack beer lovingly crafted by Stu at Kirkby Lonsdale Brewery. Stu knows a lot about beer, and is also rather handy on a bike. He completed the Silk Road Mountain Race covering 8,000km and 26,000m of climbing in Kyrgyzstan. Think about that for a moment: 70,000 feet of climbing, and he drinks beer. Perhaps its time to take another look at how you train?
breaks the adertising standards code in the same way as this ad:
ASA.ORG.UK I know it's tongue in cheek, I'm neither offended nor really bothered, certainly not bothered enough to do any more than politely raise it here, but promoting beer and biking is a bad idea. I was really disappointed when Steve Peat did that descent with beer cans on his helmet.
Sel the beer by all means, but with more appropriate text.
as a response we’ve added a big box to the article
Certainly seems a fair approach to me, as you say, some people drop prefer these sorts of "services", making clear its a costed service along side providing a link and price for the diy option is a reasonable ballance imo, on what is clearly a promotional piece.
It's a shame it needed a prod but, personally, I think it's the right response.
promoting beer and biking is a bad idea
Why? I wholeheartedly disagree.
Fair play Mark, as one of the original complainers I think that's a reasonable response.
Having applied for (and received) a few Visas myself, if I'd known about or could have afforded a service to take ANY of the hassle out of it for me, then I would have gladly considered it.
I've not even read the article, but I'm not sure I even feel they or STW are obliged to promote a link to the DIY Visa portal, so long as article isn't trying to suggest there is no other way to get one (e.g. any inference that you HAD to use their services would be super dodgy).
They offer a service, at a price, if it appeals to you, what's the problem? Frankly if you want a VISA and were not already aware that there was a DIY route then perhaps you are the sort of person who needs a bit of hand holding anyway (not meant to sound derogatory, just saying there is a legitimate market for hand-holding...)
Why? I wholeheartedly disagree.
I'm with you 100% on this one airvent!
Mmmmm.... recovery beer.
[ no claims were made in this post as to the effectiveness or otherwise of beer to actually aid recovery ]
Mmmmm…. recovery beer.
[ no claims were made in this post as to the effectiveness or otherwise of beer to actually aid recovery ]
Between a bottle of Wainwright and a SIS recovery powder I know what I'd take...
The truth is that I down a pint of water with an SIS electrolyte tab in it after every ride... otherwise I get cramp later. It actually works. Beer tastes a hell of a lot better though.
Recovery beer is best beer.
Can't beat a cold isotonic sports lager after a hot ride
breaks the adertising standards code in the same way as this ad
No it doesn’t. Saying that a man rides bikes and drinks beer (not indicating doing it at the same time) is not the same as ‘you should drink whiskey whilst climbing a mountain’
Nothing refreshes like an ice-cold glass of milk.
is not the same as ‘you should drink whiskey whilst climbing a mountain’
what about whisky is that ok?
Nothing refreshes like an ice-cold glass of milk.
So that’s how you never ended up playing for Accrington Stanley.
Consumption of alcohol must not be linked to increased popularity, sexual success, confidence, sporting achievements or mental performance. Anything which portrays drinking alcohol as a challenge or as having therapeutic qualities is banned, as is anything that promotes binge drinking or suggests that alcohol can solve your problems.
So it's an ad, but still visible to subscribers?
must not be linked to increased popularity, sexual success, confidence, sporting achievements or mental performance
Well, it can be safely linked to the kind if riding I do then, that’s for sure.
😹
[ beer is tasty, it won’t increase anything other than your belly ]
Last ones of these we had had been put out by a middle aged couple, with sites designed to look like the DVLA and the like and charging fees where the info was supposed to be free.
The courts took any extremely dim view of it and the couple were charged and a court order made out to recover their criminal income. Cant remember the exact details, but wasnt that long ago.
AdamT - As a full member you don't see display ads. What we are talking about here is paid/sponsored content. All these articles are sponsored and paid for by brands we work with.
Consumption of alcohol must not be linked to increased popularity, sexual success, confidence, sporting achievements or mental performance. Anything which portrays drinking alcohol as a challenge or as having therapeutic qualities is banned, as is anything that promotes binge drinking or suggests that alcohol can solve your problems.
It says he rode a bike up a mountain and drinks beer, not while or because. Quite a difference and in no way a violation of what you posted. Good thing it doesn't bar linking consuming beer and posting bollards on the internet
it's an ad
As a full member you don’t see display ads. What we are talking about here is paid/sponsored content
So which is it 🙂
An advert dressed up as something else