Forum menu
By the way it's job losses that cause industrial action not the other way round.
Posted : 21/10/2009 4:49 pm
Credit me with a bit of intelligence! 😆
I like evidence based assertions rather than dogmatic belief. 😉
Posted : 21/10/2009 4:54 pm
You are misinterpreting your own graph which clearly shows an increase in unemployed people or the % unemployment rate from 1970 to 1984 which by your own argument is a time of high industrial dispute.
No I'm not.
1984 was not "a time of high industrial dispute". The 1970s was.
'My graph' shows that in the last 30 years the period with lowest unemployment, was the 1970s.
And here's a nice picture for you ...
[img] 
[/img]
Posted : 21/10/2009 4:54 pm
'My graph' shows that in the last 30 years the period with lowest unemployment, was the 1970s.
Ah, so that was what you were trying to prove? Well done - I think you've managed it.
Don't really see what it has to do with strikes though.
Posted : 22/10/2009 9:06 pm
Don't really see what it has to do with strikes though.
There was a lot of strikes going on in the 1970s.
*he mutters through clenched teeth*
Posted : 22/10/2009 9:22 pm
So you invented a correlation between the strikes and low unemployment! 😉
Posted : 22/10/2009 9:41 pm
Page 3 / 3
Prev