Forum search & shortcuts

Rugby thread 2016/2...
 

[Closed] Rugby thread 2016/2017

Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

No idea from the video I saw, looked like it but hard to tell.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 2:00 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

To be clear even if his neck was the problem and he had no head injury it was still ****ing stupid letting him play on.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are we suggesting that the Dr who assesed him was lying?

To be fair medical teams have let him play on before, which is part of the reason he has problems.
I hate to say it, but he could be looking at a short career.
To be clear even if his neck was the problem and he had no head injury it was still **** stupid letting him play on.

Absolutely right. George needs to make sure he looks after himself too.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:22 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

To be fair medical teams have let him play on before, which is part of the reason he has problems.

The difference in this case is that he was taken off an assessed in the case with Wales he stayed on. Mind you I can still recall George Smith stumbling off v Lions and then coming back on!!

he could be looking at a short career.

Indeed, he should just play for Wales he'd be perfectly safe as he is never passed the ball!


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Did George leave the field? The clip I saw (was at the shed on the piss all day), he was being given a once over, nodded a bit and ran off!


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:46 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Dont know I thought I read he was assessed and past fit. I've only seen that clip.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:47 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

North, 24, left the field for a mandatory head injury assessment before returning to the action

From beeb


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:49 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Lydiate to miss rest of season having done acl. Had some shit luck with injuries that bloke.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep, he left the field actually looking fine and looked ok for the rest of the game too.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 3:50 pm
Posts: 7874
Full Member
 

If there's a suspicion of unconsciousness the player stays off.

I'd say there was definite suspicion of loss of consciousness.


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 9:30 pm
Posts: 44850
Full Member
 

He should not have been on the pitch after that. follow the lead of the scottish teams - I have only once seen a player come back on after an HAI and he clearly wasn't knocked out at all but still had one after a heaqd blow.

I feel sorry for North - his employers have done him a huge disservice and he really should think about stopping playing if he wants to have a healthy life after rugby. How many concussions has he had now?


 
Posted : 04/12/2016 9:34 pm
Posts: 487
Free Member
 

Irish papers reporting Pat Lam to leave Connacht at the end of the season to join Bristol. Big loss to irish rugby. Having a 4th team to bolster the Irish squad has made a big difference to Irish strenght and depth. Without it several of the current squad would have fallen through the net, including Ultan Dillane


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Reminds me of Sexton trying to yank Barretts head off. TMO spends so long trying to look for a grounding that they miss the fact its a clear pen try and maybe a yellow!

TMO can only answer the refs question, so if the ref dont ask.

On another note, why was Dan Cole on the pitch, is his propping really that good that he needn't even try for the rest of the game


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 12:47 pm
Posts: 44850
Full Member
 

TMO can refer foul play to the referee


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup, but in respect of awarding a try or not, I think they have to answer the questions the ref asks. That's said, if he said try yes or no, he could have said no because of the foul play. If it was to check grounding then that's that I 'think'


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 1:36 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

TMO can only answer the refs question

TMO's can highlight foul play so he could have done. Neck rolls were only in vogue for about 3 months though! I'd like to see the clear out from that game towards the end that ended with a Aussies legs flying through the air!


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

AA - we only won because of the ref - no need to labour the point. It happens all the time.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 2:48 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Reading and understanding was never a strength of yours was it.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 2:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No true, very easy to misunderstand - "Aus have been raped by this ref!" - isnt it? So please excuse me.

Still where would an England win be without some clips of cheating/foul play/referring incompetence/ etc to add some insight? We are all the better for it.

It was a shame that it was Aus not Eng who were only 3 pts up at half time. I was looking forward to comments about a world class team butchering so many scoring chances, but we had to do without this time.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 3:04 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Aus have been raped by this ref!"

They were, doesnt mean the better side didnt win though. Every 50:50 decision went to England. Missed forward pass led to england try, vuniopla being off side led to another. Ref managed to be poorly placed for all the Aus scoring chances in the first half which meant the question was always try yes or n rather than any reason not to. Not to mention Yardes try being very touch and go but I suppose rightly BOD was given to the attacker. Shame said BOD wasnt awarded to Aus. The yellow at the end was a joke too but the game was done and dusted by then.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 6:00 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

I was looking forward to comments about a world class team butchering so many scoring chances, but we had to do without this time.

What are you dribbling on about?


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do.Not.Feed.The.Troll.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 6:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😀


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 6:17 pm
Posts: 2591
Free Member
 

The yellow at the end was a joke too

Indeed, especially as it was on Mike Brown who's obviously attended the Yoanne Huget school of acting.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 6:55 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Browns a **** isnt he!! I'd love him if he was welsh but alas he's just a ****!!


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 7:08 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

[quoteI'd love him if he was welsh

All you need to know about AA in relation to the Rugby threads in one sentence. Everytime he pokes you with a stick repeat that sentence on your head.

He's going to be a nightmare after England win the 6N.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 7:31 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

He's going to be a nightmare after England win the 6N.

Great lets hope they dont then!


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 7:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trying to be as impartial as possible, that was a clear yellow IMHO. Late, no wrap just an out and out shoulder charge. If Lawes had done it, non-englanders would be saying it was filthy.


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 7:58 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Trying to be as impartial as possible,

No place for that filth on this thread!

I was impartial too. ****ing hate the Aussies!!
Greenwood had a right old rant about it on Sky....


 
Posted : 05/12/2016 8:10 pm
Posts: 3339
Free Member
 

If there's a suspicion of unconsciousness the player stays off.

I'd say there was definite suspicion of loss of consciousness.

It seems the club now agree. North's off for an independent assessment and they've released a statement saying to don't have access to the same replays in on the touchline that the TV does. If they'd seen the footage on the day that they've now seen he wouldn't have continued.

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38227807 ]http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38227807[/url]


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Greenwood had a right old rant about it on Sky....

He was ranting that the act [b]shouldn't[/b] have been a yellow card not that it [b]wasn't[/b]
The rant was aimed at world rugby, not the ref. The ref did what he's been instructed to do, nothing more.

As for North - it's exactly the same as Gatland did, and it was crap then as well. I can't believe they didn't know and given all of the monitoring and that they have a team sat there, glued to laptops etc that someone didn't spot it. FFS it's even shown on the big screen in the sodding ground!

And don't get wound up by AA, he trolls this thread mercilessly looking for anyone non welsh to have a pop at. I think he's quite harmless really.

Oh, and Lydiate out until next season, that's one less Lion...


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 4:54 pm
Posts: 44850
Full Member
 

Feeble excuse about North. He needs to find himself a decent employer


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 5:05 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

North himself may not have known either..at least he is being checked.


And don't get wound up by AA, he trolls this thread

So discussing rugby on a rugby thread is trolling? Not sure I understand. Mind you its funny when you say something about Brown being a **** who I'd love if he was welsh and Kryton gets his knickers in a right old twist about a complement!! I hated Martin Johnson too and that Dilly Dally ****. Always like Dan Luger though!


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 5:30 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

My knickers aren't in a twist, thats so 2015.

I merely made a comment based on my past experience. By father, son and hold ghost you are forgiven AA, I hold no malice but merely observe your predujice.


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 5:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

t seems the club now agree. North's off for an independent assessment and they've released a statement saying to don't have access to the same replays in on the touchline that the TV does. If they'd seen the footage on the day that they've now seen he wouldn't have continued.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/38227807

Sounds like backpedaling to me; there's been a lot of discussion about it and they're now think 'oh balls'. I struggle to truly believe that they weren't aware of it or able to see it.

There's been too many players retiring because of concussion, hopefully he won't be the next.


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 5:50 pm
Posts: 44850
Full Member
 

AA - you must admit to a little one eyed ness and a delight in poking folk on rugby threads? Its fine tho - its what many of us are like when it comes to rugby - somewhat tribal


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 5:57 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

AA - you must admit to a little one eyed ness and a delight in poking folk on rugby threads?

Of course thats the point!! Most people who actually like rugby and watch more than just the England games understand it.


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 6:22 pm
Posts: 44850
Full Member
 

BTW - AJW and North are poopie!

😉


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 6:57 pm
 loum
Posts: 3625
Free Member
 

Did anyone ever hear what happened to the Welsh medics who "didn't see it" last time?
Kept their jobs?
Or moved with him to Saints?


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 7:08 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

BTW - AJW and North are poopie!

You beast!! I picked Fin Russel as my Lions 10 a few pages back and Hogg at 15... consider my supports for the Scotch players removed!


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 7:14 pm
Posts: 44850
Full Member
 

🙂


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 7:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The tribal stuff should stay with the wendies, but rugby wouldnt be the same without imagining what AA's scarlet-tinted (or should that be fake-tanned tinted) observations would be each match, let alone the clips!!

Who needs the TV pundits with their unbiased, dull analysis?


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 7:22 pm
Posts: 26905
Full Member
 

Will Skelton to Saffarcens on a short term deal!


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 8:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The tribal stuff should stay with the wendies, but rugby wouldnt be the same without imagining what AA's scarlet-tinted (or should that be fake-tanned tinted) observations would be each match, let alone the clips!!

Can we keep Gav out of this? He's a bristolian now. As is Pat Lam 😉
Sadly I am hearing whispers that he may not play again (not Pat, Gav) 😐
Shame, because he's in great nick, still fast, still sharp.

On the George front, good. I'm pleased that it's being taken seriously. On the saints front, they are no worse than any other "employer" in rugby. In fact Jim Mallinder is far more palatable than most.


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 10:39 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

And achingly sexy......


 
Posted : 06/12/2016 10:42 pm
Page 26 / 136