[Closed] public transport my arse

Crazy prices - I commute for an hour an half (nearly) each way, in Aus, up the sunshine coast. Cost has just gone up to $8.30 each way. Far less than petrol, and parking is at least $18 a day if one can find it. So a bargain.

Oh and

No one NEEDS a car

No one NEEDS a car

But if that were the case I doubt you'd have entered this thread.

if everyone chose a lifetstyle/location where a car wasn't necessary we'd be in the shit

back to my original post, i will most likely commute by bike 3 x week

You car will cost more than you think - it always does. Sitting down drinking a coffee reading the paper or cursing in traffic in a car?

You always say that, but none of my commutes have ever made sense via public transport, on either a financial or time basis, especially not if you consider the car essential for other parts of your life and so effectively swallow the cost of everything but wear and parking of the commute. And remember, not everyone dislikes driving even if it's in a queue, and most train journeys are not the sort that come with a coffee and enough room to breath, let alone read the paper.

Cycling, yes, often a big improvement financially, but usually similar timewise. And in a car you can share with someone else.

Public transport simply isn't a viable option for most of the people I speak to about the matter, who have lives to lead instead of being sat on the platform drinking coffee or stuck standing in a train for 30 mins.

You only "need" a car because of choices you have made

What's that, the choice to live away from his work? What if he couldn't afford to live near or move to near his work, I know I can't. Not really a choice at all then is it, unless you suggest he gets a different job. We could all do admin work from home I suppose.

Point proven - its a want not a need. You only "need" a car because of choices you have made

djglover - Member
No one NEEDS a car

I NEED my vehicle for work. Don't fancy lugging around 3 or 4 20kg gas bottles, 3 tool bags, ladders, 3 large boxes of spares, 60m of hose, and all my other work related bits on public transport!

Even when I go to college once a week (which is about 12 miles way), it takes me well over an hour if I use public transport, 15 minute walk to the station, about 45 minutes on the train and then another 15 minute walk after that to get there, and the train costs near £5. Plus the wear and tear to my trainers and my jeans, then I buy a paper and a coffee which is another few quid 😉 I may aswell drive. It takes about 30 minutes (so I actually get there ontime without getting up early), costs about 20p a mile in diesel, secure parking is free, and I get my own stress free space, listening to music I want to, not what the idiot next to me decides to play on his ipod. I hate public transport.

Please explain what those choices are, then.

He will simply explain that you chose that career and that location, so you chose to need a car. Life's black and white to some people and shades of grey to others, the greeny in me sees in black and white, the rational person in me sees in full colour, I think TJ has the greyscale/colour view too, but likes to wind people up by downgrading to B&W just for the forum 😆 .

I personally love the ideology behind public transport, unfortunately it never ever lives up to it in reality, partly due to costs and partly due to the "rolling stock" available and partly due to the fact that I find the habits and lack of thought (ipods on deafeningly loud, mobile phones shouted down your ear, drunks, people refusing to budge over, ipod stealers etc) of a large portion of the general public quite remarkably repugnant. Fix those things and I'll gladly play along.

TJ steadfastly refuses to recognise that there are a great many people who live in places where public transport is almost non-existent, not because they chose to, but because they were born there, job opportunities nearby are again almost non-existent, so in order to actually have a job they have to travel significant distances, and before TJ comes in with the predictable “why don't they move then", that presupposes they could actually afford a house elsewhere.
A case in point: a close friend of mine lives in Colerne, Wilts. It's a small village with a military base/former airfield attached. The nearest town is Chippenham, ten miles, or Bath, around five or six.
She works part-time in the Pump Room kitchen while doing a one day a week catering course in Chippenham. She doesn't own a car, there is one bus to Chippenham at 7am, and one to Bath around the same time. That's it. The one to Chippenham doesn't even go right into town anymore, or to the station, close to the college. No, it stops over a mile from there on the edge of town, so she has another twenty minute walk to college. This isn't a ‘lifestyle choice', it's called 'living at home', because living elsewhere is too expensive. Every time a bus service is set up to outlying villages, it gets withdrawn after a while, because there are only relatively small numbers from each place using it, and grants get withdrawn that would keep the service running, because country people aren't among Labour's 'core voters', so don't matter, and don't get nice regular transport provided. Even transport to nearby cities is crap; if I wanted to go to Bristol for a concert, most gigs finish at 11.00pm, but the last train back is 10.30. What frackin' use is that? Another friend of mine owns a small country hotel. It's a mile from the nearest main road and bus stop. When it snowed, a Japanese guest arriving at the station was turned down by all the taxi drivers because they were afraid to chance the 1:4 hill to the hotel in the snow. She managed it, just, in her little Polo. Unless you're in a city or large town, public transport in this country blows goats.

Got to admit though, as trolling goes it was an excellent one liner...

I'm always amused by a couple of friends of mine. Both live about the same distance from work (both within the congestion zone). One earns about £30k but insists that he has to drive because public transport is for poor people, the other earns £1.5m+ and gets the train because driving into town is for idiots.

No one said you cannot have a car - just be clear it is not s nessesity but a luxury

Why, purely to keep you and djglover happy? Everyone else sees it as being pretty obvious that we aren't going to keel over and die without access to a car...

Ride in 5x a week.

(wheres the job- Prince of India ? :P)

I used to live in Kielder, without a car - 17 miles to nearest bank and butchers, four buses a day - Trip to the supermarket was 35 miles and two buses each way, a whole day out, and your frozen food was defrosted by the time you got back. Very limited employment options, unable to go to any pub but the stranglers, as the nearest other one was eight miles away.

The local butchers van came round once a week, and there was a small village shop with massively inflated prices - could you live there without a car? course you could! could you live there and have a job and any form of life without a car? just about! - was it pleasant living there without a car? yes, but it was a ****ing sight more practical, comfortable and realistic to own a car than not!

The question for those who say you dont need a car, is could you live your life without a car and not have to rely on neighbour's and friends who do have a car when there's a problem (ill child, doctors appointments, things to move/and or carry, late night flights landing? ) - through the vast majority of the UK's landmass, I'd say the answer is no.

Errrmm - everyone needs shelter and clothing and food.

I didn't say people don't need shelter. I said people don't need houses (as proven by that guy on here that lived in a tent for a year or whatever). And I never said people don't need food - you made that bit up all by yourself Jeremy.

And why do we need clothes (other than to protect any absurd modesty civilization has brought about)?

Point proven - its a want not a need. You only "need" a car because of choices you have made

(wheres the job- Prince of India ? :P)

yes, cleaning their windows, open mouth style

I'm a bus mechanic.
I have to be at work to open up before the first bus goes out, or lock up after the last bus comes in, so I can't use my free bus pass to travel to or from work both ways by bus. 🙄

Another thing I would add - I think people need cars now much more than they needed them 20 years ago because the public transport system has been dismantled bit by bit. Where I grew up the buses ran every 20 minutes as a child, now they run every hour on a reduced route. The last buses run at around 9pm except on one main route.

Perhaps the public transport links have eroded because more people are using cars, but how long ago was it now that the Labour Government promised to improve things, and how can people be expected to use a public service that doesn't match their requirements?

If the government wanted to really make a difference, they'd allow Public transport vehicles to use red diesel. the way to encourage public transport is to reduce the cost, not to increase the cost of motoring.

The government (all governments!) are hooked on the use of the motorist as a cash cow - between road tax, fuel tax and vat on cars and fuel tax, the government bring in far more than they ever spend on roads, its all tied up in the classic socialist position seen on this thread earlier

Personally I'd use govt money to put in more train lines, but that's just me And probably TJ.
EDIT: If the govt had any money these days.

The thing is people can't be expected to switch to public transport until that transport is fixed. You can't tax one to death and attempt to remove it until you provide a reliable and regular solution FIRST. It just won't happen, it cant happen, but successive governments seem to attempt it on green grounds.

No one said you cannot have a car - just be clear it is not s nessesity but a luxury

Reductio ad absurdum. It's patently obvious that survival is possible without a car so there literally is NO POINT in passing on this amazing insight.

The word 'need' in this concept is an abbreviation for 'need to support the lifestyle to which I aspire', such as is commonly used by many people. I think TJ is being needlessly pedantic. The discussion of how to reduce our car dependence is another thing entirely.

grants get withdrawn that would keep the service running, because country people aren't among Labour's 'core voters', so don't matter, and don't get nice regular transport provided

That's such bullcrap. When the money is tight, you have to cut services taht affect the fewest people. It's got nothing to do with politics really. What DOES have to do with politics is that the government can't ever make enough money from taxation to pay for all the things we whinge about, because if they try and tax us more we just whinge again.

The electorate are like a bunch of bloody children on the whole, and it really gets my goat.

I NEED my vehicle for work. Don't fancy lugging around 3 or 4 20kg gas bottles, 3 tool bags, ladders, 3 large boxes of spares, 60m of hose, and all my other work related bits on public transport!

People who need a motorised vehicle for work are being stopped from doing their jobs by all the people who have chosen to use a car when they could use public transport, walk or cycle.

People who need a motorised vehicle for work are being stopped from doing their jobs

No they're not, they can still do their job with their car.

TandemJeremy - Member
Molgrips - you miss the point. You can want whatever you do want - its just wrong to say you need a car - it is always a choice unlike food or shelter.

No one said you cannot have a car - just be clear it is not s nessesity but a luxury

Now normally I agree with your point of view but im afraid having a car IS a nessesity, theres no way I could get the kids to school and get to work on time any other from of non car based transport just wouldnt work

No they're not, they can still do their job with their car.

Not stopped then, but delayed.

When you're waiting in for a plumber who's stuck in traffic, or they charge you more because of the time it'll take them to get to you, it's because of people using cars when they don't need to.

A skip company here was complaining that some new traffic lights were making it take longer to get to pick ups and drop offs. It was costing them money. But the problem isn't the traffic lights, it's the unecessary traffic on the roads.

Apparently when the M25 was opened you could speed along as you pleased; last night I crawled along the west side and wondered why we all needed to be on there. I work as a consultant at different client sites; to get to my current one I'd have to go in and out of London including a tube trip between London stations so that would be expensive and time consuming. I need a car for my job in that realistically I couldn't do it without one.

As for train ticket prices. My wife goes from Bookham to Woking which is 12 miles by car but can't drive so goes by train; as there is no direct line between the 2 she has to go via Guildford which I assume is why the cost is about £13 return - pretty much what it costs to go all the way into London which is about 25 miles.

If the government wanted to really make a difference, they'd allow Public transport vehicles to use red diesel.

Well said. This is such an obvious point I can't understand why it doesn't get mentioned more often. Farmers can use duty free diesel but buses and trains can't - can anyone make sense of that?

Season Ticket Costs
Stone (Staffs) (SNE) to Lichfield Trent Valley (LTV)
Available Standard Class Adult Season Tickets(Travel is only allowed on services operated by London Midland)

Days/Months Price
7 Days £44.00
1 Month £169.00
3 Months £506.90
6 Months £1,013.80
12 Months £1,760.00

I recall that sustrans did some work that showed that in the 1950's, about 80% of people worked within a mile of their house, and the vast majority of the workforce (and kids) returned home at lunchtime.

You cannot reverse four decades of building and employment infrastructure thats been constructed around a car owning society, you'd have to build homes in different places (to facilitate all the out of town business parks and offices) shops in different places, businesses in different places - the change in society to return to a society where we didn't [b]need[/b] modes of personal transport would be huge, and would have huge effects on the freedoms that we enjoy today, such as the ability to change our place of work at will (portability of labour works both ways) or the ability to live where we want to - these are the reasons why public transport is a failed concept, it has been unable to keep pace with the changes in the entire infrastructure of modern life - until we're able to return to the point where whole towns grew up and worked at one factory (or we ourselves are resigned to the fact we would probably spend our whole career path in a job that we didn't choose, but was the only one available to us, then public transport will not be a viable alternative

You cannot reverse four decades of building and employment infrastructure thats been constructed around a car owning society,

Nor can you reverse the fact that we now have 3x the population we had back then, so working in cities (as may be required for a business to be well connected to its suppliers/customers) is going to either create massive urban sprawl or mean some people live away from that location. (agreeing with you ZE).

can anyone make sense of that?

Buses and trains are run by LARGE private companies. If they were run by the government we could excuse their tax to make things cheaper. So taking cash of their fuel bills is basically just giving them more profit, they'd never pass it on.

When you're waiting in for a plumber who's stuck in traffic, or they charge you more because of the time it'll take them to get to you, it's because of people using cars when they don't need to.

Never waited in for a plumber, I have to admit, but usually the only people who get their plumber stuck in traffic are those who either use a non-local plumber or who live in a city. If you live in a city you don't need a car for daily commute so you're not part of the problem (so it's no moral lesson to you), if you live out in the villages you should be supporting a local plumber who will have very little distance to travel. Otherwise it's the plumbers "fault" for living miles from his target market.

am i the only one whose experience of trains is more standing in the vestibule with a fat knacker rubbing their arse against me while blocking my nose against the smell from the backed up, wet floored bogs than...

Sitting down drinking a coffee

I'd rather my car thanks.

no pook, TJ is apparently one of the few who has a nice train journey. Sure if you do long (>1hr) journeys the trains seem to be a bit more spacious and nice, but most people's experience of train journeys under 1hr is this (this would be a good day, when I could move my arms to get my phone from my pocket):
[img] [/img]

This was my regular 1hr journey when I used the train.

So none of you will be complaining wen the price of fuel rockets within the next 5 years then?

We do not have a population three times that of the 50's.

Of course the car dependency can be reversed. It will have to be but it will take a generation. Here ( and in many places) we have the absurdity of poorly paid rural workers living in town and commuting to the coutryside and well off urban workers doing the reverse. Its simply unsustainable.

Public transport can and does work in various parts of the country. Central Scotland it is fine. Cheaper, easier and not too much slower than a car in the main.

What many of you fail to see is the direct link between the cheapness of car transport and the undesirable effects on our society. There is no shop in your town - why? 'cos all the car drivers shop elsewhere so the village shop is unviable! and so on and so on.

It took a generation or two to get into this state. It can be reversed in a similar time

So none of you will be complaining wen the price of fuel rockets within the next 5 years then?

Not really related is it, my commute will still be nicer and easier by car, just the same price. But it doesnt mean the tickets for the train were not vastly OVER priced. (price of fuel is currently rocketing, has no-one noticed the 10% rise in 12 months?)

what traffic looked like 100 years ago:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6486650610391534812#

We do not have a population three times that of the 50's.

It was an exaggeration (though it's actually true of world population, amusingly!).

Public transport can and does work in various parts of the country. Central Scotland it is fine. Cheaper, easier and not too much slower than a car in the main.

TJ, I live in central scotland, it's not cheaper or easier than my car. A return trip on the bus takes nearly 1:30 and costs around £4, goes every hour and means I have to walk half a mile at one end and 2 miles at the other. My car takes 25 minutes, leaves when I want it to and costs around £1.50 fuel and 50p parking. I can cycle to work faster than I can use public transport, and thats from a commuter village.

There is no shop in your town - why? 'cos all the car drivers shop elsewhere so the village shop is unviable! and so on and so on.

There are still shops in my town. I shop elsewhere because a local shop can't carry the diversity of products that I want.

It took a generation or two to get into this state. It can be reversed in a similar time

Not without people making large sacrifices in their standard of living, which they will naturally tend away from. You see the thing is I believe I'm odd 😆 , I could happily live in total isolation (see the BBC olymic trek thingy last night, I'd love to live in one of those remote villages) but when it's perfectly viable to have the comforts and when you don't have the lovely natural beauty and nice community spirit to go with the negatives of losing those comforts, people will never tend that way, even if the costs are vast.

No one said you cannot have a car - just be clear it is not s nessesity but a luxury

You seem to be implying that it is some kind of vain luxury that we are foolish for wanting.

Now I am fundamentally anti-car. That is to say, I wish there were fewer cars on the road and more people either not travelling or using PT. However I do appreciate that a lot of people would have to make great sacrifices to their lifestyles to do without, and that is impractical to ask since we are all engaged in trying to improve our quality of life. Spending two hours getting to work instead of 45 minutes might make a great personal statement but it might cause misery for your personal life, and people are in many cases not prepared to do it.

Now of course, a lot of people would NOT have to make great sacrifices...

I have not commuted by train so far much since I seem to have a lot of crap with me. I really should work out how to improve the situation and get on the train. It'd mean either not riding during the week or risking having my nice bike nicked from outside a hotel... neither option would cause the world to end, but would be unpleasant for me.

I've never had a car and can't drive. So, I've only ever applied for jobs near to where I live, and I've only ever chosen to live near to my family. This means my kids get to see lots of their grandparents, and we have baby sitters on tap. It also means that I'm not spending a fortune on a car each month and allows me easy access to a moral high horse.

My dad commuted [url= http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=dl1&daddr=Wallsend,+Tyne+And+Wear,+United+Kingdom&hl=en&geocode=&mra=ls&sll=54.059388,-4.042969&sspn=12.372547,28.168945&ie=UTF8&z=9 ]by car to Wallsend[/url] every day for years. When he stopped and used the train/Metro instead he said it was like going part time; getting rid of his company car meant it didn't really cost anymore.

. So, I've only ever applied for jobs near to where I live, and I've only ever chosen to live near to my family.

Only 2 jobs in the country for my qualifications and experience when I finished, and as it was I didn't get either as they were internally appointed, and I went for a job outside my field, took a wage cut and still had to move 200 miles. Had little choice, without wasting years of study and experience. Jobs near where I lived would be manual labour or fixing cars. Don't have any kids, family is scattered over the country.

So, I've only ever applied for jobs near to where I live, and I've only ever chosen to live near to my family.

that sounds cripplingly dreary. you're a long time dead, its a big world

its a big world

At YOU live in an [b]ANAL Town[/b] 😆

that sounds cripplingly dreary. you're a long time dead, its a big world

I agree, but you can't say he's wrong, just like he can't say you're wrong for choosing to do differently (even if he's doing so!).

i'm not saying he's wrong, in many ways its admirable, but it's not for me

Scruff - An anal town deserves its very own huge cock don't you think?

For those with the 'you don't need a car' comments - I do.

Unless I stop work as car ownership is a prereqisite of the job. Spose I could find another job but whoever took over from me would still NEED a car.

Oh, community nurse,btw.