Forum menu
Prince Andrew, what...
 

Prince Andrew, what a cowardly little ****.

Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

Don’t need to insinuate it when it’s clear for everyone to see on the clip

If that is a "clear" case of sexual gratification to you then it suggests a strange and unusual attitude towards sex, imo.

Does going to funerals generally present a problem to you? There are often cases of deeply upset people touching each other very closely, often they are related to each other.


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 9:38 pm
Posts: 11385
Free Member
 

No they don’t cause an issue for me as I don’t use them to squeeze a relatives backside, that may be acceptable to you but not to me


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 9:44 pm
Posts: 20979
 

Don’t need to insinuate it when it’s clear for everyone to see on the clip

You’ve reported this clear case of sexual assault to the police, then? Or are they in on it as well?


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 9:48 pm
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

that may be acceptable to you

You think that I am condoning an act of sexual assault?


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 9:52 pm
Posts: 6899
Full Member
 

Don’t need to insinuate it when it’s clear for everyone to see on the clip

I've rewatched the clip and can't see it, in fact the clip cuts off before he even gets to her backside. I suggest those of you seeing something wrong here need to go and a have a little reflection on your view of the world.


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 10:07 pm
Posts: 34530
Full Member
 

The second clip doesn't cut off

https://twitter.com/RosaCatherineK/status/1568858690475724800?t=a4D9kMFiATwIkQLjXDWPwA&s=19


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 10:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jesus, some of you need help..


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 10:31 pm
 LAT
Posts: 2405
Free Member
 

That’s his rehabilitation sorted among dog lovers.

until he’s caught bumming them.


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 10:54 pm
Posts: 101
Free Member
 

This is the thread that just keeps giving. Classic.


 
Posted : 11/09/2022 11:21 pm
Posts: 2176
Free Member
 

Oh God, not the Corgis too!

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62870783


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 4:23 am
Posts: 6315
Full Member
 

He's got the dogs cos he's the only one who doesn't go out much.

Perfect dog owning candidate


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 7:59 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14007
Full Member
 

What?! He pauses for a brief moment and squeezes! That’s not stopping yourself from toppling over!

I think there's an appropriate French phrase - "honi soit qui mal y pense".


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 8:02 am
Posts: 11385
Free Member
 

Hopefully that’s on his coat of arms


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 8:36 am
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

That's an English expression, DrJ, from Norman times. I've never heard it on this side of the channel. However the modern day translation "honte à celui qui y voit du mal" is fitting IMO.


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 9:52 am
Posts: 9387
Full Member
 

he’s made it into my local news channel by adopting his mother’s Corgis!

A complete misunderstanding after someone said the dogs need to go to the groomers.


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 9:59 am
Posts: 11385
Free Member
 

Yeah shame on us 🙄

So those who can’t see anything wrong please explain the differences between these two pictures. I’ll make it easier for you, first picture his hand is flat and on the lower back. Second picture is a few moments later where his hand moves over her backside and fingers bend as to grab something. Yeah perfectly acceptable.

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

I’ll no doubt have the usual bores, trying to interpret the meaning of me posting these pictures 🙄 (just imagine me lay here knocking one off over them, and you 😘)


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 10:25 am
Posts: 15692
Free Member
 

trying to interpret the meaning of me posting these pictures 🙄

I'm trying to see how you interpret that as a sexual assault.

You claim "He pauses for a brief moment and squeezes!" how brief was this brief moment - three quarters of a second? Personally I don't see him pausing at all but if he does it is so brief that I can't see how it can be interpreted as some sort of sexual experience for his gratification.

I'm really struggling to see anything remotely sexual about the whole thing, let alone that it is obvious.

But perhaps I am just too innocent and naive.


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:30 am
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

I’m really struggling to see anything remotely sexual about the whole thing, let alone that it is obvious.

But perhaps I am just too innocent and naive.

I'm with you fella....


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:32 am
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Are we also confident it actually is his daughter?


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:34 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Whether it is a grope or not (I happen to think “not”), I think it’s pretty insensitive to the woman in question (Eugenie I think?) to have this being debated all over social media (Or is it just on STW?)


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:41 am
Posts: 5164
Free Member
 

Think folk are getting desperate to have a go at some of the royals, doubt Andrew did anything wrong here, just looks bad, same with Meghan, she can't really move without being analysed, you can see they're holding fire on Charles and Camilla just now, but that'll be the next target, once sufficient time has passed.

It's just a circus this whole thing, predominantly made up by the press, and those horrific 'royal correspondents', honestly they are more up their own arses than the actual royals!


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:43 am
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Or is it just on STW?

Judging by the Twitter links, not.


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:44 am
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

A complete misunderstanding after someone said the dogs need to go to the groomers.

👏 👏


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:45 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Judging by the Twitter links, not.

Ah right, I see. Other than Irish Twitter (which has been great fun the last few days) and NFL, I’d kinda been avoiding it a bit. 😀


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:46 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14007
Full Member
 

Think folk are getting desperate to have a go at some of the royals, doubt Andrew did anything wrong here, just looks bad

Surely how you behave with a close family member can be different from how you should behave with anyone else? I can easily imagine touching my daughter the way he touched his. Doesn't make me a perv, I hope?


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 1:14 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

I think the guy is a creepy bastard, but not seeing anything untoward in that clip. Just looks like an old guy using his daughter as a balance aid. Shit, this feels like I’m defending him.

I feel sorry for the Corgis


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 9:55 pm
Posts: 81
Free Member
 

Due to her death you’ll no longer receive a letter from the queen when you turn 100.

Instead you’ll receive a text from prince Andrew when you turn 14.


 
Posted : 12/09/2022 11:40 pm
Posts: 8945
Free Member
 

Oof! Chapeau, sir.


 
Posted : 13/09/2022 12:19 am
Posts: 4064
Full Member
 

A complete misunderstanding after someone said the dogs need to go to the groomers.


 
Posted : 13/09/2022 11:19 am
Posts: 31089
Full Member
 

Not okay…

https://twitter.com/peston/status/1569787727687651335?s=21
https://twitter.com/peston/status/1569787732528087040?s=21


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:11 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Will he be standing in for any state visits to the USA?


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:16 pm
Posts: 20979
 

If it’s the 4 next in line, after Camilla, wouldn’t it be William first, then Harry, then Andrew and Eugenie?

Maybe Anne doesn’t fancy it?


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:20 pm
Posts: 43955
Full Member
 

Doesnt fancy it? What was that we've been hearing about duty etc etc etc


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:22 pm
Posts: 2298
Free Member
 

If it’s the 4 next in line, after Camilla, wouldn’t it be William first, then Harry

Camilla isn't in line, and I'm not sure Harry is these days since he removed himself from duties. I think - though believe me I am no expert on royalty - it would go:

King charles (of course)
William
Harry
Anne
Andrew
Beatrice
Eugenie

after that it would be Edward I guess.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:43 pm
Posts: 13493
Full Member
 

https://www.royal.uk/succession

The line of Succession
SOVEREIGN

1. The Prince of Wales

2. Prince George of Wales

3. Princess Charlotte of Wales

4. Prince Louis of Wales

5. The Duke of Sussex

6. Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor
7. Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor

8. The Duke of York

9. Princess Beatrice, Mrs. Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi

10. Miss Sienna Mapelli Mozzi

11. Princess Eugenie, Mrs. Jack Brooksbank

12. Master August Brooksbank

13. The Earl of Wessex

14. Viscount Severn

15. The Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor

16. The Princess Royal
17. Mr. Peter Phillips

18. Miss Savannah Phillips

19. Miss Isla Phillips

20. Mrs. Michael Tindall

21. Miss Mia Tindall

22. Miss Lena Tindall

23. Master Lucas Tindall

You'll have to do a bit of a google to work out who they are though (Mrs Michael Tindall - aka Zara Phillips)


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:44 pm
Posts: 1202
Full Member
 

Willian has kids. They’d be after him not Andrew.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:45 pm
Posts: 10746
Full Member
 

I believe you.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:47 pm
Posts: 20979
 

This isn’t about succession, it’s about what happens when Charles is alive, but incapacitated. Hence camilla, and having to be at least 21


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:51 pm
Posts: 13493
Full Member
 

This isn’t about succession, it’s about what happens when Charles is alive, but incapacitated.

Does it really matter though......worst case - someone else cuts a ribbon on a new library. You could use the remaining chuckle brother.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:53 pm
Posts: 20979
 

No, but the tweet is trying to lead people to think that if Charles goes on holiday, Andrew will take over. The reason it isn’t Anne it seems is, rightly or wrongly, that she’s well down the order of succession.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:58 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

What if rather than a library it is to cut the ribbon on a new girls school, would anyone really want to send the prince of nonce.

He was relieved of his duties for a reason, but unfortunately that reason wasn't for what he had done, but to protect the "familly" now because they still don't understand they are trying to rehabilitate him already.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 1:59 pm
Posts: 31089
Full Member
 

It’s not about succession. The Queen Mum signed/acted on behalf of the Queen at times (with one other) when she was abroad.

This is about giving Andrew a role in the affairs of the new King, and therefore the country. He should be left out entirely.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 3:02 pm
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

This is about giving Andrew a role in the affairs of the new King, and therefore the country. He should be left out entirely.

He was meant to be but Queenie just stuck her fingers up to the country when she walked into her husbands funeral with him. He will all over the media for the next few days as well.

Sweaty nonce should just be told to **** off.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 3:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Business as usual?

https://twitter.com/OldTomYoung/status/1126844382479572997

Two Princes


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 3:26 pm
Posts: 33187
Full Member
 

This is about giving Andrew a role in the affairs of the new King, and therefore the country. He should be left out entirely.

Definitely my view. And if Harry has chosen to leave the Firm, he's out the list as well.


 
Posted : 14/09/2022 3:30 pm
Page 26 / 37