Forum menu
Plans to scrap chil...
 

[Closed] Plans to scrap child care vouchers...

Posts: 4
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1051661]

...and instead give 10 hours/week free childcare for 2 year olds.

If you feel strongly enough against, sign the petition [url= http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/keepvouchers/ ]petitions.number10.gov.uk/keepvouchers[/url] and/or [url= http://findyourmp.parliament.uk ]write to your MP[/url]


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 1:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Haven't the Tories already said they will scrap these plans when they come into power next year?


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 1:59 pm
Posts: 6905
Full Member
 

But we've got to pay for Brown's failed social engineering policies somehow. Who better to pick up the tab other than the 'privileged' middle classes. Expect tax credits and child benefit to be, gotta pay for those child places somehow, how else are those teenage mums going to find time to go shopping and meet their freinds.

Be under no illusion, Cameron sees the same people as easy cash cows too. Long gone are the days of respect for those who work hard for a living.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 23349
Full Member
 

Depressingly there stumpyjon, I think that you are right.

Under these plans my wife will be working for a loss just to keep her job open until both our kids are in school.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bloody parents and kids getting free stuff... 😉

I think people should get cash for not having kids! lol


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Brilliant I was looking forward to these next year for our ickle one so my missus could go back to work. Childcare is 'kin ridiculously 'spensive.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...and instead give 10 hours/week free childcare for 2 year olds.

Won't that equate to a similar saving for kids over 2 - eg £200 per month for a couple of people getting vouchers?


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They'd be better off scrapping the cycle scheme!


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:25 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
Topic starter
 

my understanding is 10 hours/week free childcare for [b]2 year olds[/b]. NOT OVER 2 year olds. Great if you have a 2 year old.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If it were up to me, you should have to put £100k in a bank deposit account before you're allowed to have kids so that society can use that to pay for all their care, education, medics etc..... 😉

C


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But IIRC aren't there already free hours for 3+ year olds? so this effectively just brings the age lower.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They'd be better off scrapping the cycle scheme!

To be honest the cycle scheme is a con. I know of numerous folk on with ctw bikes that work at least a 45minute car journey away! So they get their shiny 'spensive weekend bike for buttons 🙁 (Ok I am jealous 😆 )


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Be under no illusion, Cameron sees the same people as easy cash cows too. Long gone are the days of respect for those who work hard for a living. [/i]

Since when did working hard for a living equate to being 'middle class'? You honestly think pushing paper about a desk and going to meeting is hard work.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair enough, don't remember getting anything when we made financial sacrifices to have one parent stay at home to look after our own child


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be honest the cycle scheme is a con. I know of numerous folk on with ctw bikes that work at least a 45minute car journey away! So they get their shiny 'spensive weekend bike for buttons (Ok I am jealous )

Of course that happens. What also happens as I've seen here is that a lot of people who'd never have bothered have bought bikes on B2W since they can't resist a bargin and have then actually started to ride to work - some only occassionally, but some regularly. On balance, I'll bet that works out as a good thing.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Brilliant I was looking forward to these next year for our ickle one so my missus could go back to work.

You will still be able to claim - without looking at the exact details and running from memory, people can apply up till 2011 and take advantage of it until the child is of school age. IE, if you have a baby now you can claim in 2011 and keep on claiming until 2014. 2015 is the last date any tax benefit can be taken.

Or something like that.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 4:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Going slightly off-topic, but I'm looking into childcare vouchers as BB Jr has just started nursery and Mrs BB has gone back to work P/T. I phoned the tax credit folk who, despite being as helpful as they can given the whole tax credit system isabout as complicated as it can possibly be, said that if I did use childcare vouchers they'd need to see a whole hill of documentation to further ammend our tax credit claim.

As the benefit of the tax credit is likely to amount to f'all now Mrs BB is back at work and our combined income is write on the borderline, am I right in thinking that the childcare voucher is going to give me far more benefit than the, er, benefit from the tax credit system?


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 566
Free Member
 

quick question on the childcare vouchers - what is the max. per month I can put into them? My company says it's something like £150, I thought it was a good bit more.......


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

quick question on the childcare vouchers - what is the max. per month I can put into them? My company says it's something like £150, I thought it was a good bit more.......

Its about £240 I think, but both parents can claim the £240 giving a monthly total of £480.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 4:29 pm
Posts: 15
Free Member
 

We use them and despite the savings they give, if we where to put both our kids in nursery when my wife worked we would still be out of pocket.

So friends and family help out with one of them, so the wife actually earns something.

They always said being a Nurse was a vocation, but it really is true when working for the NHS on a contract and having young kids.

Looking forward to when they are both at school, only 4 years to go 🙁


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 5:50 pm
Posts: 3230
Full Member
 

Scrap the military and scrub a '0' off all house prices. We've save billions on military hardware and pensions and no-one would have to prostrate themselves to pay for the house they live in. Then we could revert to a parent being the primary carer for their kids through-out their childhood.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 6:23 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

I thought the plan was to keep it for basic rate taxpayers? Seems fair enough to me - the higher tax rate starts at substantially more than most people earn.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 6:28 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

i thought they were just going to reset the limits to the people that actually need the credits? there are people I work with that have a household income of £80k and still get credits...


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 16210
Free Member
 

rootes1, if both parents earn £40k then they're basic rate payers and would still qualify under the proposals!


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 6:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My mate started that petition 😀


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's £243 max per month that you can sacrifice at the moment. Sind you avoid tax it then effectively saves you around £100 per parent per month depending on how much tax you pay.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 7:06 pm
Posts: 3854
Full Member
 

ranos - higher rate of tax is £37400. If you are higher rate tax payers then you should be able to afford childcare without the vouchers. I can't think of an arguement against this. I'm a higher rate tax payer and haven't claimed them for our childcare because I feel like it's not ethical, even if I pay huge amounts of income tax.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 7:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My issue with these schemes is that people who earn more save more, surely those on low incomes should save more than those on high incomes.

I don't care really as junior is 12 years old and I earn loads 😉


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 6140
Full Member
 

So Gordon brown comes up with another scheme designed to confuse people so they don't get full value from the system. Sounds familiar. It's only the idle single mums who gain from benefits, if you don't earn a decent wage it's because you're lazy. And all the children who grow up with help from the benefit system also become work shy and never do the kind of jobs that help anybody. Sigh.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 9:26 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

It was in the paper at the weekend that Brown is shelving the plans as he's getting such a backlash from both his own party and the opposition.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 9:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if you don't earn a decent wage it's because you're lazy.

pmsl! Seriously? Talk about arrogant and deluded, not to mention generalising to the point of idiocy. 🙄


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 6140
Full Member
 

Sorry, sarcasm doesn't come thru very well on emails. I'm not fortunate enough to be on a good wage and I was having a go at those that think the lower paid shouldn't have kids and all single mums are a waste of space, etc.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oops 🙂 glad to gear it though!

Of course, if you weren't so damn lazy, you'd be able to afford a butler like I have to do your posts for you with sarcasm properly denoted 😉


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 9:55 pm
Posts: 6140
Full Member
 

Servants night off 😀


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...not to mention punctuation 😉


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:13 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

These are badly targeted benefits, most of it goes to higher rate tax payers.

That said, I'l be milking it before its phased out


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is that really right - the bit about most of it?


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:15 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

higher rate of tax is £37400

No, its £43875, if you don't have any taxable benefits, £37400+ your tax free alowance


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

Is that really right - the bit about most of it?

Yes, they are the people who get most benefit, nearly 2X that of basic rate tax payers, so its still badly targeted from that point of view.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 6140
Full Member
 

Same with the CTW scheme, it's the well off that save the most.


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:27 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

Yep 🙂


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 3854
Full Member
 

djglover your are of course right. Your total cumulative tax allowance before higher rate is £43875 - even less reason to need vouchers!


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 11:24 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

Ransos > exactly is it right that a household with an income of £80k from two adults get tax credits!
? No if you can,t afford kids Don,t have them I say


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 11:34 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

I thought tax credits topped out at a household income of around £58K?


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 11:37 pm
Posts: 25943
Full Member
 

^ wot they said - poorly targetted and also not universally available (again, like the bike schemes). "free" nursery hours for all is much better IMO (though we used the scheme when we had the chance)


 
Posted : 18/11/2009 11:51 pm
Page 1 / 2