It was just a bit of light hearted banter
Sorry, it's hard for us sometime sunset shooters to tell at times
Not particularly that relevant to the op but my lenses in order of least used on my Sony (crop sensor) are...
Tamron 70-300mm f4
Sony 18-55mm f3.5 kit lens
Minolta 50mm f1.7 - my usual choice for walkabout
Want a wider prime next - prob 35mm and also something really wide angle.
Sorry, it's hard for us sometime sunset shooters to tell at times
Sunsets! That makes you a pro. I mainly shoot cats - in boxes....
[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8374/8545669460_345c31c29e.jp g" target="_blank">
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/brf/8545669460/ ]George in a box[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/brf/ ]brf[/url], on Flickr
Sunsets! That makes you a pro.
Nope, can't be. I clearly don't take enough pictures of cranes on dull days from oblique angles.
Having now bothered to read the whole thread and your camera body choice, if you can afford it the already recommended by many £822 (Warehouse Express) Canon 24-105mm f/4 would be ideal.
Read a review from (in my opinion) the best (i.e. most accurate) online lens review site [url= http://www.lenstip.com/240.1-Lens_review-Canon_EF_24-105_mm_f_4L_IS_USM.html ]HERE.[/url]
Nope, can't be. I clearly don't take enough pictures of cranes on dull days from oblique angles.
weather looks a bit iffy, what's stopping you.
That makes you a pro. I mainly shoot cats - in boxes....
You are Erwin Schrödinger and I claim my £5
weather looks a bit iffy, what's stopping you.
I live in Australia - weather's glorious. Oh, and I have a real job to get to....
Back before I jumped ship I used a Canon 24-105L rather a lot... and it was pretty good, but then I bought a 24mm prime which was so much better.
Currently I am using a Nikon 24-70 f2.8 most of the time, and if I were going back to Canon I would probably get the equivalent. It is a big, heavy lump but optically it is superb and the extra stop of light is so handy both for low light situations and nice background blur.
That said, I think I am going to invest in a 24mm, 50mm and 85 or 105mm in the near future as that should cover most my basis - and for Ultrawide I have a 12-24 anyway... and the long end covered by a 70-200 2.8 and 300 4
Currently I am using a Nikon 24-70 f2.8 most of the time, and if I were going back to Canon I would probably get the equivalent.
There isn't an equivalent, trust me. 😉
I live in Australia - weather's glorious. Oh, and I have a real job to get to....
Oh well, there's always the beautiful sunsets.
'real job' ? I had one of those once, never again 8)
a fast 35 and a set of legs?
If I only took one lens with me, it would be a 50mm prime.
If I had to have just one, then it'd be my fast fifty. If I was allowed two, then the 50 and the 12-24 (crop sensor Pentax).
Oh well, there's always the beautiful sunsets.
Every cloud, MrSmith, every cloud....
*looks out of window* Oh, there aren't any!
24-70 f/2.8
