DD Quelle surprise, but 100% for consistency.
winky smiley
Smiley smiley
Etc
As long as you continue to patronise and obfuscate in a vain attempt to hide your right wing bias, [i]someone[/i] will point it out thm. You must really miss winding up TeeJ all the time.
You took your time JY! But don't hold back especially with the personal stuff! This is a bickering thread after all!
But any argument requires that the founding premise is correct. So this mini-debate started when I commented on the odd fact that VC and DC a saying things that you might not expect. A correct premise. Then JW introduces one good point and another false premise. When that was pointed out, guess what, the personal stuff starts. Why because the premise was floored.
Attacking Burnham? One throw away line???? But note the similarities between what Burnham did in practice and what the Tories do now. There is nothing new nor politically exclusive about private and public sector working together as Burnham know s well. So does it take a courage of conviction to point that out or shall we hide between petty party politics?
Great BS line there DD but full marks for consistency again. But enough this is getting out of hand. I will fight my corner but this is getting to the point where the forum rules are being tested. For that alone, I will step out. The last time JW went on an outing sesh was the last night of the long knives and no one wants that again.
Andy Burnham earlier...
[img] 
[/img]
You took your time JY! But don't hold back especially with the personal stuff! This is a bickering thread after all!
Well I think i made these comments first tbh on the other page- is this a wisdom fail,should I patronise you , talk down to you re quote it ?
What personal stuff I put a wink in so there is none 😉
the personal stuff starts. Why because the premise was floored.
I can only assume you have a totally different version of the internet from me what I saw was him exposing you for what you are whilst you floundered and did personal stuff as per usual [ whilst denyng it as per usual and bigging up how insightful you were/are]
Attacking Burnham? One throw away line???? But note the similarities between what Burnham did in practice and what the Tories do now.
Jezzez man you cannot actually help yourself can you you did it again.
OK I get it you do it, you cannot see you do it and no amount of folk pointing this out to you will make you realise this, TJ would be PROUD. Like him it is not personal [ he took it that way too] but it is happening
does it take a courage of conviction to point that
You are awesome * Swoons* we dont deserve your insights and we are just too dumb to see them 🙄
I will fight my corner but this is getting to the point where the forum rules are being tested.
As only you'd know. 😀
Much better than the slightly creepy stalker approach.
Ooh!
The last time JW went on an outing sesh was the last night of the long knives and no one wants that again.
*coughs*
Besides, iirc you, tj and z-11 made that one go postal without need for anyone else's help. I think that night must have secured your big hitter badge: I also think people remembering and reminding you stuff you posted before goes with the territory when you keep returning to post again and again on threads like that. Nevertheless I'm flattered and not particularly creeped out you remembered my small contribution.
But hey, let's not let Yunki's fabulous argu-thread go all nichey on the third page.
To change the record, I will confess my pleasant suprise at this bit of news:
In his most significant political intervention since taking office, Archbishop Welby warned that “children and families will pay the price” if plans to change the benefits system go ahead in their current form.Mr Welby and the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, have backed a letter to The Telegraph written by 43 bishops who say the benefits cuts will have a “deeply disproportionate” effect on children.
[url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9920509/Lib-Dems-back-Archbishops-warning-on-welfare-cuts.html ]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9920509/Lib-Dems-back-Archbishops-warning-on-welfare-cuts.html[/url]
When Welby came in, I was (as a premier member of the bleedingheartleftytrackworld sub-group) deeply cynical that Rowan Williams' successor should be an Eton old-boy with a background in the oil business, and predicted a nice quiet lack of challenges to (what I consider) the old-boy network in government. Yet less than a year in, Welby is sticking his neck out and also seems to have some of ythe Lib Dems behind him too. Putting aside my reservations about the links between church and state, it is most entertaining to see the man some bemoaned as Cameron's 'ringer' already sticking his oar in.
What do we reckon?
What do we reckon?
"Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?"