Forum menu
Mumford and sons. I...
 

[Closed] Mumford and sons. I just don't get them....

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

they are rubbish. u2 are worse. glastonbury is a festival for people who are sell outs in denial.

get the ford orion out put the sound system in the boot and the camo netting and lets drive to the country side.


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 12:22 pm
Posts: 11851
Full Member
 

See, this thread interests me, I reckon I've got a pretty credible, if not massively esoteric, taste in music, and I like Mumford and Sons a lot, absolutely rinsed the album when I got it last year and its still standing up to repeated listens. It did become a bit of a 'break-up' album though, which might have skewed my tastes...

Anyway, for the folk knocking them, what else is there in a similar ilk which they would consider 'good'?


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Posh boys dressed like pikeys, topped off by singing in fake irish accents. In my book this makes them a gaggle of ****s.


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

13floormonk - try My First Tooth. they are playing glasto as well i think. not as good as mumford but i quite like them


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 12:39 pm
Posts: 6130
Full Member
 

Anyway, for the folk knocking them, what else is there in a similar ilk which they would consider 'good'?

Fleet Foxes are still the daddies, really, of new folkish type stuff


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 1:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Saw them/met them when they played at a friends wedding in Nov 2009.....they were superb. Gave me goose bumps when they played as the bride walked down the aisle.

Seemed like nice chaps at the bar later too.

Keane were guests too (the groom tours/records with them)that night ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 1:46 pm
Posts: 11851
Full Member
 

Fleet Foxes

Not for me thanks, what I've heard really didn't do it for me, they seemed a lot more 'folk' than Mumford and Sons?


 
Posted : 25/06/2011 1:54 pm
Page 2 / 2