Forum menu
Kate Middleton
 

Kate Middleton

Posts: 1789
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#13036277]

Amazing how poorly advised the Royals are.... not really a good look for the front page of The Times today. Just ask a Ukrainian or Palestinian what those fun little drones are used for!

..


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:08 pm
Posts: 16526
Full Member
 

It's the crazed look on her face that worries me!


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:09 pm
 csb
Posts: 3288
Free Member
 

It appeals to the kind of people who like royalty I guess?


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:12 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

Don't knock her, she's done well to get to colonel at her age.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:14 pm
ernielynch, binman, dissonance and 29 people reacted
Posts: 11386
Free Member
 

That look on her face suggests she’s flying that armed drone over her neighbours house


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:16 pm
Poopscoop and Poopscoop reacted
Posts: 13496
Full Member
 

As someone who wore a uniform (and got it dirty) I find the dressing up as a toy soldier and playing with the equipment of death for a photo shoot pretty ****ing grim. But doing so right now...with that grin on her face....she can get to ****! Leach.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:20 pm
reeksy, tjagain, funkmasterp and 27 people reacted
Posts: 16526
Full Member
 

Houns
Full Member
That look on her face suggests she’s flying that armed drone over her neighbours house

Calling in an air strike on Harry and Megan I reckon?


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:20 pm
binman and binman reacted
Posts: 3604
Full Member
 

As someone who wore a uniform (and got it dirty) I find the dressing up as a toy soldier and playing with the equipment of death for a photo shoot pretty * grim. But doing so right now…with that grin on her face….she can get to *! Leach.

Lighten up. It's a bullshit defence engagement activity as part of her colonel-in-chief role, they've been a dog and pony show since time.

I like how you use your 'dirty' uniform as though it somehow gives you authority and credibility.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:25 pm
crossed, nuke, stumpyjon and 7 people reacted
Posts: 3604
Full Member
 

Calling in an air strike on Harry and Megan I reckon?

There's no way she got her JTAC qual. 😂


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:27 pm
Poopscoop and Poopscoop reacted
Posts: 13496
Full Member
 

Lighten up. It’s a bullshit defence engagement activity as part of her colonel-in-chief role, they’ve been a dog and pony show since time.

You kind of made my point for me.

I like how you use your ‘dirty’ uniform as though it somehow gives you authority and credibility.

Read it as you want.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:28 pm
ernielynch, funkmasterp, jamj1974 and 9 people reacted
Posts: 8020
Full Member
 

That look on her face suggests she’s flying that armed drone over her neighbours house

Either that or she has found one of the particularly annoying papparazzi photographers and after scrawling "how do you like being on the receiving end" on the drone is currently following them everywhere they go


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:33 pm
 poly
Posts: 9135
Free Member
 

As someone who wore a uniform (and got it dirty) I find the dressing up as a toy soldier and playing with the equipment of death for a photo shoot pretty * grim. But doing so right now…with that grin on her face….she can get to *! Leach.

I'm no royalist but (1) the are the "King's Army" so complaining the royals are playing soldiers seems a bit ironic; (2) why is the equipment of death worse when there is a war on - if people thought about it in peacetime maybe we would be a bit less fighty; (3) I'm sure many a "real" soldier has had a weird grin on when getting to play with the toys in training/peacetimes - she wasnt actually shooting anyone; (4) her entire reason d'etre is to do photoshoots - smiling is her thing; (5) I didn't understand why she got dressed up - she didn't last week for her 'mountainbiking' but it seems she is actually an officer in the army so was actually just wearing her "official" costume.

I suspect most people see that picture and it just reinforces their existing biases either she's a sweet princess doing her bit to support our troops and support Britain's place in the world or she's a sponger with no grasp on reality and the real problems in the world.   It was by no means the most upsetting photo in todays press so distracted nicely from the real issues.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:37 pm
relapsed_mandalorian, andy4d, doris5000 and 11 people reacted
Posts: 16526
Full Member
 

she wasnt actually shooting anyone

I'll wait till the morning news comes in before I decide 😉


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:39 pm
Posts: 57
Free Member
 

I just came here to thank you for not splitting her name up with exclamation marks.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:40 pm
funkmasterp, sirromj, funkmasterp and 1 people reacted
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

That look on her face suggests

She's just found out the neighbours are building a swimming pool to be covered by a 3 storey atrium in a classic Greek style..


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:41 pm
jamj1974, Poopscoop, Ambrose and 3 people reacted
Posts: 268
Full Member
 

Ta mate.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 10:43 pm
Posts: 570
Full Member
 

Is she controlling William’s new toy?

[img] https://mavicpilots.com/media/artem-shypulya.3490/full [/img]


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 11:20 pm
hatter, dissonance, jamj1974 and 7 people reacted
 nerd
Posts: 439
Free Member
 

Her name isn’t Kate Middleton and hasn’t been for over a decade.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 11:41 pm
Kuco, Bunnyhop, Kuco and 1 people reacted
Posts: 12983
Free Member
 

Yeah, it's Kate Upperton now she's made it to the big leagues of leaching.


 
Posted : 09/11/2023 11:47 pm
thols2, mashr, mattyfez and 19 people reacted
Posts: 9231
Full Member
 

I am a committed constitutional republican.  As a result, I detest members of the royal family taking various honorary military ranks that they have not earned.  It’s just another royal privilege they do not deserve.  poly pointed out earlier in this thread they were the “Kings army” - but in reality they have no control over the use of the armed forces.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 10:37 am
Poopscoop, Watty, Watty and 1 people reacted
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

I’m no royalist but (1) the are the “King’s Army”
well that’s bollocks, it’s the British Army. No reference to “King’s” anywhere. Just because you give some bloke an honorary title doesn’t mean he can dictate troop deployment or call in bombing runs 😂

And even if he could, Kate [i]isn’t[/i] “The King” so this is the equivalent of your boss’ wife coming into the office at the weekend, rifling through the cupboards and dressing up in any PPE she finds, then using all the photocopiers.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 10:55 am
keefmac, jamj1974, Poopscoop and 5 people reacted
Posts: 16526
Full Member
 

I had to actually Google her married name!

It's: Catherine Elizabeth Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cambridge

Which is rather odd as Williams full name/title is: William, Prince of Wales, KG, KT, PC, ADC (William Arthur Philip Louis)

So shouldn't she be Mrs Louis?

Mind you, they do like making up names for convenience to keep us plebs placated, hence the "House of Windsor"...


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 12:41 pm
Posts: 9139
Full Member
 

Harry was Harry Wales wasn't he? Does that mean he was actually related to the outlaw Josey Wales? I think we should be told!


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 1:01 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50604
 

Gawd bles ‘er. Wearing a poppy and supporting are troops. 

Not like that nasty Megan, she’d refuse to wear one are support are troops. 


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 1:07 pm
Posts: 5384
Full Member
 

Wearing a poppy

Placement is pretty good though...


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 1:11 pm
Posts: 4109
Free Member
 

it seems she is actually an officer in the army

Good grief, this country...


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 1:18 pm
Poopscoop and Poopscoop reacted
Posts: 8414
Free Member
 

Harry was Harry Wales wasn’t he? Does that mean he was actually related to the outlaw Josey Wales? I think we should be told!

Was his nickname 'Killer'?


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 2:39 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

Harry was Harry Wales wasn’t he? Does that mean he was actually related to the outlaw Josey Wales?

On that basis…. Ant Middleton?  That connection might start to justify the mad stare, if not the uniform.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 2:48 pm
Posts: 14105
Full Member
 

That photo is just sexy-time dress-up.

She's operating a remote control love length, and the smile is because she's just put it on max-vibrate. 🙂


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 2:50 pm
Posts: 9139
Full Member
 

She's more "minion" in that photograph than "cheeky Geordie".


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 2:52 pm
Posts: 16526
Full Member
 

doomanic
Full Member
Wearing a poppy

Placement is pretty good though…

SWAT team incoming!


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 3:00 pm
Posts: 1459
Free Member
 

Subtle ring on her finger too,from the Elizabeth Duke range?


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 3:03 pm
Posts: 1334
Full Member
 

or she’s a sponger with no grasp on reality and the real problems in the world

That gets my vote poly.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 3:05 pm
funkmasterp, Poopscoop, funkmasterp and 1 people reacted
Posts: 4305
Full Member
 

I feel sorry for all the squaddies how noboubt had to make sure everywhere smells of fresh paint and polish just so she can have a pr photo taken. I’m not sure how that’s meant to improve anyone’s morale within the ranks


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 3:42 pm
Posts: 12983
Free Member
 

“House of Windsor”…

We are pretty friendly with the Germans these days perhaps they should reaccept the whole incesstuous nonsense and retake Saxe Coburg Gotha or whatever they actually are.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 4:43 pm
Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

Meh, I think this is pretty much her job, the drone thing is incredibly tonedeaf but the worst you can say about her from that is that she maybe should have said "no", I doubt she had anything to do with the idea. And when you've married into the weirdest family in the world and you've never really done anything yourself, probably knowing when to say no isn't so easy. Or even thinking "maybe I should/can say no to this".


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 5:41 pm
stumpyjon and stumpyjon reacted
Posts: 6138
Full Member
 

Given the amount of tone deaf stuff her and the incredibly wealthy bald bloke have done I don't there's much thinking at all.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 5:58 pm
 poly
Posts: 9135
Free Member
 

well that’s bollocks, it’s the British Army. No reference to “King’s” anywhere.

well you can be pedantic about the name - but they fight in his name, he declares war and they swear an allegiance to him and his successsors!

https://www.royal.uk/the-royal-family-and-the-armed-forces#:~:text=On%20enlistment%2C%20the%20Army%20and,Head%20of%20the%20Armed%20Forces.

Just because you give some bloke an honorary title doesn’t mean he can dictate troop deployment or call in bombing runs 😂

I’d abolish the monarchy in a heartbeat, because of everything they represent.  I don’t have any personal issue with Catherine though - and she’s doing the task expected of her in her official role so criticising her rather that a country that is stuck in the 1700s is a bit dim.

And even if he could, Kate isn’t “The King” so this is the equivalent of your boss’ wife coming into the office at the weekend, rifling through the cupboards and dressing up in any PPE she finds, then using all the photocopiers.

it’s not.  It might be more akin to a member of the family business who is not the chairman of the board but has a significant role being involved in a product launch and involved in a photoshoot.  I doubt she woke up one day and said “I’d like to go play with military toys today”, someone specifically invited her - probably with lots of back and forth over dates and clothing sizes etc!  The assumption that this was was for “her” benefit ignores that there are equally as many people willing to exploit her image to promote their cause, whether it’s a charity, an environmental cause or in this case military recruitment etc.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 6:10 pm
Posts: 6902
Full Member
 

Never did understand the hatred of drones in warfare, people seem to think they are sneaky or underhand, so much better if you're killed or seriously maimed by a real person! Otherwise pretty much this:

Meh, I think this is pretty much her job

There's much more serious things to get your panties in a bunch over. And this.

Lighten up. It’s a bullshit defence engagement activity as part of her colonel-in-chief role, they’ve been a dog and pony show since time.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 6:30 pm
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

so criticising her rather that a country that is stuck in the 1700s is a bit dim.
nah, if anyone's a bit dim it's whoever said this
reason d’etre
😂


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 6:32 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

Why safety goggles? Is it in case she can’t control the drone and it flies directly in to her face?


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 6:40 pm
Posts: 3604
Full Member
 

Never did understand the hatred of drones in warfare, people seem to think they are sneaky or underhand, so much better if you’re killed or seriously maimed by a real person!

Wait until they find out we also use JTAC's via fast air and rotary platforms to drop guided explosive munitions onto people, often out of their line of sight and sound...


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 6:56 pm
Posts: 3604
Full Member
 

Why safety goggles? Is it in case she can’t control the drone and it flies directly in to her face?

Because someone would have had to have drawn up an Exercise Action Safety Plan / Exercise Aide Memoire and put in mitigation to reduce the risk associated with the whole day to as low as reasonably practicable.

And since Telic/Herrick eyepro has become a mandated piece of PPE for quite a few activities, losing sight ****ing sucks or so I've been told.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 6:58 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

Why, exactly, is everyone getting their knickers in a twist over the fact she’s flying a drone? <br />Anyone would think that the use of drones in warfare was a really, really new thing being used in Ukraine and Palestine!

Newsflash; the first guided drones were flown by Great Britain and America in 1917, and Austria launched 200 balloons carrying explosives in the 1800’s. Then there are the likes of the Reaper, which have been used to take out insurgents all over the Middle East.

Then there’s surveillance drones…

Deary me, some people will use any excuse to indulge in a bout of pearl clutching.🙄


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 7:00 pm
Posts: 3604
Full Member
 

I feel sorry for all the squaddies how noboubt had to make sure everywhere smells of fresh paint and polish just so she can have a pr photo taken. I’m not sure how that’s meant to improve anyone’s morale within the ranks

Depending on the leadership culture, this isn't always a chore. Although though as these visits often have senior military personnel attached, the sort of people that can influence the direction of your bosses career so some get very twitchy.

I've found myself painting shovel and pick heads for a visit before. The best visits are when you're on exercise, kit is usually suitably minging so people tend to give less ****s, so on camp visits can be an absolute ballache.

Oh yeah, and I've also got my kit dirty.


 
Posted : 10/11/2023 7:03 pm
chrismac and chrismac reacted
Page 1 / 5