Forum search & shortcuts

John Terry Verdict
 

[Closed] John Terry Verdict

 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#4159312]

Not Guilty it seems


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

still guilty of being a complete K^@$$£^ though.....


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the narrative seems to suggest its okay to use abusive racist language if you have enough people (9) prepared to say your not racist..

i hope this sets a clear process going forward.. its not about whether you offend its about if you mean it..


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:37 pm
Posts: 57476
Full Member
 

I'm not a racist, but.....


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:38 pm
 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Lack of evidence apparently! Shame there weren't any TV cameras or witnesses around eh........ 😕


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:39 pm
Posts: 2462
Free Member
 

Context and intention.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:39 pm
Posts: 6886
Free Member
 

Does calling someone a n****r once make you a die hard racist?? Has he said this on a number of occasions?

He comes across as a bit of a nob at times but no more so than many a forum member.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:42 pm
Posts: 16222
Free Member
 

On balance, I think he's guilty, but it seems this wasn't proven beyond reasonable doubt...


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You can tell from looking at him that he is a racist!


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Personally I'm glad. He might be a complete *&*% £*$&$*&&38@~#4£%55!!! but I think it sets a horrible precedent if you sentence someone for the thoughts in their head and the words that come out of their mouth.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yet another tosser footballer doing the usual tosser things.

When will the people who watch and pay for football wake up, or are they all tossers too?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:51 pm
Posts: 57476
Full Member
 

Don't judge all footy fans by the standards of Chelsea, please?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 2:53 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20176
Full Member
 

[i]its not about whether you offend its about if you mean it..[/i]

Now, I'm no Terry apologist, but isn't that how it should be?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:01 pm
 xcgb
Posts: 52
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Steve dont sit on the fence, say what you think! 🙂


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:02 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

ok who's black on here? I know John Terry is an idiot, but bear in mind the strength of the words he used in meaning. Its VERY offensive to a black person and goes very, very deep and way back historically. Its highly offensive, and totally unacceptable for a caucasian/white person to refer to a black person in that way, provoked or not.

IMO he should be punished for the poor standards he's set to the rest of the footbal kids of whom some see him as a role model.

I can guarantee you if 16stonepig were black he'd change his view pdq.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:03 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20176
Full Member
 

[i]ok who's black on here?[/i]

Are you? Just to put your answer in context, like.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:05 pm
Posts: 5299
Free Member
 

Don't judge all footy fans by the standards of Chelsea, please?

& Ill thank you not to judge a clubs fans by the action of one man.. 😉


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i'm black


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ok who's black on here?

mmmmm. Doesnt look like anyone is black. I'm Scottish though, will that do for a bit of brain-dead, sanctimonious tokenism?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:07 pm
Posts: 4155
Free Member
 

"When will the people who watch and pay for football wake up, or are they all tossers too?"

Footballist

Edit ... or did you say it and not really mean it


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:08 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

*sigh*


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:09 pm
 SiB
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just got back from Skiathos, kids said I was black but not sure that counts?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have the body of a black premier league football player. I'm not offended.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its VERY offensive to a black person

Really? know that for a fact do we? ALL black people would find it VERY offensive, like some amorphous group without their own feelings?

Interesting that Anton said that he was disappointed, rather than 'VERY offended'


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:13 pm
Posts: 2462
Free Member
 

ok who's black on here? I know John Terry is an idiot, but bear in mind the strength of the words he used in meaning. Its VERY offensive to a black person and goes very, very deep and way back historically. Its highly offensive, and totally unacceptable for a caucasian/white person to refer to a black person in that way, provoked or not.

IMO he should be punished for the poor standards he's set to the rest of the footbal kids of whom some see him as a role model.

I can guarantee you if 16stonepig were black he'd change his view pdq.

You're not suggesting that you have to be black to be offended by racism are you? No, of course you're not. That would be stupid.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 57476
Full Member
 

Is it under your patio Yeti? Please please please let it be Ashley Cole


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

IHN - Member
ok who's black on here?

Are you? Just to put your answer in context, like.

No, so I'm hardly qualified to speak on behalf of black people. I'm just pointing out that in this thread at least, its appears to be deemed acceptale for JT to have used the "N" word - but then its full of middle class honky's. 😉

However, my wife is black, my son is of course mixed race, and the inlaws and extended family I've spent the last 14 years with are black too.

I'm pretty confident their view of Mr Terry will have nothing to do with him insulting a black player, but everything to do with his choice of words.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:15 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

fervouredimage - Member
You're not suggesting that you have to be black to be offended by racism are you? No, of course you're not. That would be stupid.

No, I'm not.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:16 pm
Posts: 2462
Free Member
 

No, so I'm hardly qualified to speak on behalf of black people.

But you did it so well earlier...


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:17 pm
Posts: 4155
Free Member
 

"I have the body of a black premier league football player. I'm not offended."

Micheal Ricketts or Aaron Lennon?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

at least one of the words he used were accurate. he (ferdinand)wasn't having sex, he isn't a female genital but he is black!


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:19 pm
Posts: 27603
Free Member
 

highclimber - Member
at least one of the words he used were accurate. he (ferdinand)wasn't having sex, he isn't a female genital but he is black!

Ah, that's OK then. 😕


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was thinking Micah Richards... but I'm still not offended.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 2462
Free Member
 

middle class honky's

I presume you think it's acceptable to use that slur because you are white?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:24 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So if I'm in a bar tonight, pissed and I decide to post on someones twitter page from my phone do I have a defence in the cold light of day?

Sorry this guy was sober. FIFA/FA with all their postering still haven't come down hard (paltry club fines is one of them) for even recent offences.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:25 pm
Posts: 57476
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:27 pm
Posts: 57476
Full Member
 

So if he's not guilty, does this mean we'll have to rely on Suarez for our racist outburts this season? He can't shoulder that burden alone, surely?


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:28 pm
Posts: 21029
 

So, a sweepstake on how long this thread is gonna last?

I give it another hour..


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:30 pm
Posts: 4155
Free Member
 

"So if I'm in a bar tonight, pissed and decide to post on someones twitter page do I have a defence in the cold light of day?"

No ... but completely different


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:32 pm
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

It's alright [b]tomhoward[/b]. everyone that complained about the "Sweary Northern Animals" have just imploded upon seeing this thread and are marching on-masse to the Mods as we type.

Quazy Quackers.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:35 pm
Posts: 57476
Full Member
 

I hear you're a racist now father....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Maybe Terry just thought that Ferdinand lived in that little village up in Scotland that has a small ferry terminal?

That's the defence I'd've gone for.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:36 pm
 loum
Posts: 3625
Free Member
 

Does anybody know how much terry's legal defence cost?
I'd have expected someone on £5 million+ a year to be paying for the best possible legal team, especially with the potential impact a guilty verdict would have on his future earnings.
But as I understand it, if he then wins the not guilty verdict, the taxpayer picks up that bill, whatever the cost.
Would anyone with more legal knowledge let me know if this is correct please.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

However, my wife is black, my son is of course mixed race, and the inlaws and extended family I've spent the last 14 years with are black too.

Mine too. I still dont know what you're on about.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:38 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ones stone cold sober saying things the other is pissed/not him/herself.

The only difference is one is 'in writing' the other is caught on camera and its a wee bit obvious - not just to a professional lipreader.


 
Posted : 13/07/2012 3:38 pm
Page 1 / 3