Not Guilty it seems
still guilty of being a complete K^@$$£^ though.....
the narrative seems to suggest its okay to use abusive racist language if you have enough people (9) prepared to say your not racist..
i hope this sets a clear process going forward.. its not about whether you offend its about if you mean it..
I'm not a racist, but.....
Lack of evidence apparently! Shame there weren't any TV cameras or witnesses around eh........ 😕
Context and intention.
Does calling someone a n****r once make you a die hard racist?? Has he said this on a number of occasions?
He comes across as a bit of a nob at times but no more so than many a forum member.
On balance, I think he's guilty, but it seems this wasn't proven beyond reasonable doubt...
You can tell from looking at him that he is a racist!
Personally I'm glad. He might be a complete *&*% £*$&$*&&38@~#4£%55!!! but I think it sets a horrible precedent if you sentence someone for the thoughts in their head and the words that come out of their mouth.
Yet another tosser footballer doing the usual tosser things.
When will the people who watch and pay for football wake up, or are they all tossers too?
Don't judge all footy fans by the standards of Chelsea, please?
[i]its not about whether you offend its about if you mean it..[/i]
Now, I'm no Terry apologist, but isn't that how it should be?
Steve dont sit on the fence, say what you think! 🙂
ok who's black on here? I know John Terry is an idiot, but bear in mind the strength of the words he used in meaning. Its VERY offensive to a black person and goes very, very deep and way back historically. Its highly offensive, and totally unacceptable for a caucasian/white person to refer to a black person in that way, provoked or not.
IMO he should be punished for the poor standards he's set to the rest of the footbal kids of whom some see him as a role model.
I can guarantee you if 16stonepig were black he'd change his view pdq.
[i]ok who's black on here?[/i]
Are you? Just to put your answer in context, like.
Don't judge all footy fans by the standards of Chelsea, please?
& Ill thank you not to judge a clubs fans by the action of one man.. 😉
i'm black
ok who's black on here?
mmmmm. Doesnt look like anyone is black. I'm Scottish though, will that do for a bit of brain-dead, sanctimonious tokenism?
"When will the people who watch and pay for football wake up, or are they all tossers too?"
Footballist
Edit ... or did you say it and not really mean it
*sigh*
Just got back from Skiathos, kids said I was black but not sure that counts?
I have the body of a black premier league football player. I'm not offended.
Its VERY offensive to a black person
Really? know that for a fact do we? ALL black people would find it VERY offensive, like some amorphous group without their own feelings?
Interesting that Anton said that he was disappointed, rather than 'VERY offended'
ok who's black on here? I know John Terry is an idiot, but bear in mind the strength of the words he used in meaning. Its VERY offensive to a black person and goes very, very deep and way back historically. Its highly offensive, and totally unacceptable for a caucasian/white person to refer to a black person in that way, provoked or not.IMO he should be punished for the poor standards he's set to the rest of the footbal kids of whom some see him as a role model.
I can guarantee you if 16stonepig were black he'd change his view pdq.
You're not suggesting that you have to be black to be offended by racism are you? No, of course you're not. That would be stupid.
Is it under your patio Yeti? Please please please let it be Ashley Cole
IHN - Member
ok who's black on here?Are you? Just to put your answer in context, like.
No, so I'm hardly qualified to speak on behalf of black people. I'm just pointing out that in this thread at least, its appears to be deemed acceptale for JT to have used the "N" word - but then its full of middle class honky's. 😉
However, my wife is black, my son is of course mixed race, and the inlaws and extended family I've spent the last 14 years with are black too.
I'm pretty confident their view of Mr Terry will have nothing to do with him insulting a black player, but everything to do with his choice of words.
fervouredimage - Member
You're not suggesting that you have to be black to be offended by racism are you? No, of course you're not. That would be stupid.
No, I'm not.
No, so I'm hardly qualified to speak on behalf of black people.
But you did it so well earlier...
"I have the body of a black premier league football player. I'm not offended."
Micheal Ricketts or Aaron Lennon?
at least one of the words he used were accurate. he (ferdinand)wasn't having sex, he isn't a female genital but he is black!
highclimber - Member
at least one of the words he used were accurate. he (ferdinand)wasn't having sex, he isn't a female genital but he is black!
Ah, that's OK then. 😕
I was thinking Micah Richards... but I'm still not offended.
middle class honky's
I presume you think it's acceptable to use that slur because you are white?
So if I'm in a bar tonight, pissed and I decide to post on someones twitter page from my phone do I have a defence in the cold light of day?
Sorry this guy was sober. FIFA/FA with all their postering still haven't come down hard (paltry club fines is one of them) for even recent offences.
So if he's not guilty, does this mean we'll have to rely on Suarez for our racist outburts this season? He can't shoulder that burden alone, surely?
So, a sweepstake on how long this thread is gonna last?
I give it another hour..
"So if I'm in a bar tonight, pissed and decide to post on someones twitter page do I have a defence in the cold light of day?"
No ... but completely different
It's alright [b]tomhoward[/b]. everyone that complained about the "Sweary Northern Animals" have just imploded upon seeing this thread and are marching on-masse to the Mods as we type.
Quazy Quackers.
Maybe Terry just thought that Ferdinand lived in that little village up in Scotland that has a small ferry terminal?
That's the defence I'd've gone for.
Does anybody know how much terry's legal defence cost?
I'd have expected someone on £5 million+ a year to be paying for the best possible legal team, especially with the potential impact a guilty verdict would have on his future earnings.
But as I understand it, if he then wins the not guilty verdict, the taxpayer picks up that bill, whatever the cost.
Would anyone with more legal knowledge let me know if this is correct please.
However, my wife is black, my son is of course mixed race, and the inlaws and extended family I've spent the last 14 years with are black too.
Mine too. I still dont know what you're on about.
Ones stone cold sober saying things the other is pissed/not him/herself.
The only difference is one is 'in writing' the other is caught on camera and its a wee bit obvious - not just to a professional lipreader.

