I'd say that was a TJ win, actually.
Jesus wept...
Sorry, I can't do irony and TJ together. He gives me creeps but I'm not talking about it as I don't fancy a ban 😉
Elf, are you coming over for SSWC? A familiar face would be more than welcome.
Don't any of the other women skiers have 'sex appeal'? Please explain why only miss Vonn has 'sex appeal'.
oooh this is an interesting one Elf. Let me ask you this...Do you think she has sex appeal? Do you think all women skiers have sex appeal? if not, which ones don't and why. If so, then do all women have sex appeal?
TJ you are being a bit hypocritical. When Cinnamon Girl posted a link to a lingerie site your response was "are you going to model them for us" dont say that the likes of A+A drives women away, statements like yours to CG are more likely to drive girls away.
Pigface - have to disagree with you there. I knew TJ was joking, we have both been on here for many years, and I knew fine well that he disliked the whole A & A thing.
Jeremy Clarkson introducing the author of "The Female Eunuch" on Have I Got News etc...
"And on Ian Hislop's team, a woman who, in 1970 said that all Englishmen were either queer or impotent ([i]well, at least the ones she managed to get interested in HER, anyway[/i]) - Germaine Greer."
He's a card, that Clarko...
Discuss.
Have you read 'The Female Eunuch'?
And bad luck pigface, swing and a miss.
Pigface - have to disagree with you there. I knew TJ was joking, we have both been on here for many years, and I knew fine well that he disliked the whole A & A thing.
but what about the dainty waifs venturing out into the machismo world of MTB? are their catholic sensibilities to be ignored? their good nature offended by unhealthy discourse between fallen women and disreputable oafs flaunting their uncouth urges on a public forum?
Sorry just saw your 3 into 1 question Fred. I'll try to answer, for what it's worth.
"Why is it only Lindsey Vonn, in your onion, who brings 'sex appeal' to skiing? Don't any of the other women skiers have 'sex appeal'? Please explain why only miss Vonn has 'sex appeal'."
There are many sexy skiers of both genders. Maybe it's the skinsuits, maybe it's the speed, maybe it's the winning. Maybe it's the blonde hair but I find Lindsey particularly appealing. And I suspect I'm not alone in that opinion. You might find Anja Paerson, a skiier I also admire, more appealing. So what?
It's funny, we were watching a fav film of mine the other night: Solaris, with George Clooney. I love the whole idea of the film. The GF let slip she just like looking at George 🙂 She's not being "dirty minded" or unfaithful, she just enjoys his sexyness. We can sit together and enjoys a film together for entirely different reasons at that's great.
Imagine her reaction if I starting scolding her for being lewd and banned her from watching it?
A and A is in the rules. Setting out to disrupt peoples enjoyment of the forum is illiberal and against the rules.
Anyway, here's a pic of Anja to cheer you up:
[img]
[/img]
Mr Woppit, I really don't think that helps.
TJ, your attitudes are unhealthy. Please take them somewhere else.
No, but it fits really well.
TJ is a puritan. Look what happened LAST time they were let loose on us. We should be grateful he's restricted to belabouring us with his admonitions (with which of course, I agree) on a PUBLIC internet forum...
Anyone for the dungeon?
cinnamon_girl - Member(Pigface) "TJ you are being a bit hypocritical. When Cinnamon Girl posted a link to a lingerie site your response was "are you going to model them for us" dont say that the likes of A+A drives women away, statements like yours to CG are more likely to drive girls away".
Pigface - have to disagree with you there. I knew TJ was joking, we have both been on here for many years, and I knew fine well that he disliked the whole A & A thing.
C-G; [i]you[/i] knew, but that's not the point. TJ's misogynistic comment definitely caused at least 300 women (who didn't know) to leave the forum, forever.
here's a picture of Daley Thompson, a very A&A person:
and i'm not even gay or owt.
i'm allowed to watch 'mammals' with Dave Attenborough, and i'm allowed to find an aesthetic beauty in the form and movement of a dolphin or a leopard without anyone calling me a grubby pervert.
if i admit to seeing similar grace and beauty in a human being, it seems my name is added to the sex offenders register.
Well, one thing's for sure is that after all this carry-on, no new girlies will be ar*ed to join the Forum. 🙄
Well, one thing's for sure is that after all this carry-on, no new girlies will be ar*ed to join the Forum.
Why not, as it seems that not all 'girlies' feel the same way as you about A&A or TandemJeremy's personal crusade on behalf of all womankind?
Well, one thing's for sure is that after all this carry-on, no new girlies will be ar*ed to join the Forum.
In my opinion the girlies or women who are out there are treated as equals on the threads and there is no reason why more women shouldn't join in.
can you back that up cinnamon girl? I think it is actually a very positive thread! I may be wrong, but Tj is just trying too hard to be thoughtful and altruistic to everyone. what a bastard.
Anyone else watching Legally Blonde on TV?
A suggestion.
Those objecting to the A&A thread buy themselves a woman's magazine and look at what's in it.
Those objecting to the A&A thread open their eyes and look at the images presented in public places (eg advertising material).
What this comes down to is if you are offended, then put on blinkers so you can't see what is all around you and what is regarded as suitable for public display.
maybe they are offended by the term "girlies"?
or "chicks" 🙄
Ok as I still keep being attacked by people who don't understand the point I was trying to make and my point has been lost in people making up things I have supposedly said
Firstly giving women (and its always mainly women on these threads with men as a fig leaf) value only according to their attractiveness is sexist and disrespectful.
Secondly theses threads always deteriorate into leering laddishness "cor look at that" and "i'd like to vault her with my pole"
IMO and that of a significant number of posters this sort of behaviour is inappropriate on a forum like this. There are plenty of other sites if you like that sort of thing
I am not offended by the pictures themselves - its the attitudes the posters display that I find mildy offensive and certainly very sad.
Mr Woppit - MemberLove those skintights...
What's with those rubber horse? I don't get it. 😯
tj just accept it man you have made a tool of yer self this time. 😐
IMO and that of a significant number of posters this sort of behaviour is inappropriate on a forum like this. There are plenty of other sites if you like that sort of thing
Firstly, I don't think you're using the word "significant" in the correct context there, as an overwhelming majority of the people who have posted on this subject don't agree with you.
Secondly, most of us did understand your point but disagreed with it. The fact that you automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with you does so because they are too stupid to understand your point, I find more offensive than any number of "I'd like to vault her with my pole" comments. And it's not just on this thread that you've made that assumption.
Lastly, A&A is covered in the forum rules, which are dictated by the people who own and publish this forum. As Mark has already stated, A&A will stay and surely it's his decision as to whether it is appropriate, not yours.
Weelz - its clear many folk do not understand the point or people would not be saying " if you are offended don't open the thread" Its not about the effect on me, its about the tone it sets and the acceptance of sexist comments on threads.
As for offensive - just look at the insults that have been hurled my way. Nice.
Anyway - as you say Mark said his piece as well.
I merely wanted to correct the misunderstanding that some have of my point
I will bow out again.
I am not offended by the pictures themselves - its the attitudes the posters display that I find mildy offensive and certainly very sad.
But I thought [url= http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/an-end-to-aa-friday-kylie-please#post-2180918 ]you simply disagree with posting pictures of scantily clad women and rule breaking, even though clearly no rule is being broken.[/url] A bit of continuity in the argument wouldn't go amiss. 🙄
Don. Have a think. There is no lack of continuity at all. If no rule is being broken why are pictures removed from these threads all the time? and the threads closed?
Oh do shut up, TJ, you unremittingly boring individual.
I see a post by mandog has just been deleted, it was rather dodgy though (possible ban). Do the mods check every post in every thread 24hrs a day, it's a bit of a thankless task & must be a nightmare to police.
and the threads closed?
Because you won't leave it! 🙄 When you come in and sabotage a thread which doesn't interest you it generally degenerates into an argument. We all know your point of view and your objective, you are not adding anything positive either to the A&A thread or the community.
Many threads are deleted or have posts removed so why pick on this one week after week?
As you and your tag writing cronies are in the minority, why not just leave it? It's a thread, avoid it. I get hacked off with bad spelling and bad grammer, so maybe I make a comment and leave it or simply ignore it. I have not made it a mission to educate the illiterate or destroy threads, I prefer to educate the Spanish who generally have a higher level and more pride. 😀
check every post in every thread 24hrs a day
How do I get this job?
Pictures are removed when we feel they are pushing the boundaries of the spirit of the A&A/Kylie clause that is detailed in the rules.
Comments made on any particular pictures still fall under the usual rules of conduct and any comments that we consider are mysoginistic or just plain sexist will be moderated and the posters will be banned. If we feel that a particular thread is causing us unnecessary moderation then will simply delete or close the entire thread. This should not be interpreted as the original subject per se being against the rules just that the level of 'maintenance' of the thread has exceeded our threshold of toleration.
If the spirit of the A&A thread is adhered to then there will be no issues with us allowing it to continue. We will, however, moderate harshly any contributors who push the boundaries.
That may sound vague but it's as clear as we are prepared to make it.
Thanks, Mark.
Sounds pretty plain simple and straight forward to me.
As you were.....
Oh do shut up, TJ, you unremittingly boring individual.
So rude. Well, he manages at least to be a darn sight more interesting than some bloke who pretends to be a toff all the time to the point of utter tedium.... 🙄
I like kittens too! 😀
Can I report this thread as being inappropriate because it's CLEARLY NOT FRIDAY ANYMORE?!
Can I report this thread as being inappropriate because it's CLEARLY NOT FRIDAY ANYMORE?!
Of course you can. 🙄
Elfin, don't talk about rude when TJ is so ready to insult, ok?
I will bow out again.
thanks for the memories.
thanks for the mammaries.
Here we go again....
I fancy some crisps.
Elfin, don't talk about rude when TJ is so ready to insult, ok?
Where has he resorted to personal insults then?
Simple fact is, that TJ has asked for an end to a thread which invariably descends into stupid behaviour, yet others have missed the real point he was making and instead used it as an excuse to attack someone who's challenged their own views, without actually responding in a particularly intelligent way. Marvellous.
There's bin several posts removed from this thread as it is, and there are still one or two pathetic comments, so TJ's bin proveded right. In fact this has probably bin the least 'offensive' A+A thread ever. And I dare say a few will think twice before they post stuff in future. So a full-on TJ win of epic proportions.
Good work TJ.
As for people suggesting TJ is 'imposing his will on others'; what, and by claiming your own views are more valid than his, you're not doing the same? Love it. 😀
If TJ is the 'Forum Police', does that make some of you the 'Forum Police Police'?
People have different views. Fact of life. Some people have the bottle to express them even though they know they will be met with outrage. Many of those slagging off TJ wouldn't have the guts to express their own views, unless they knew others would back them up. Pft. In fact I think are some are jealous of TJ's ability to do something they can't. I'm right and you know it.
Logan's Run's a pretty good film, I have to say.
Kevevs; I'm just nipping down the offie. What crisps you want? I don't think they've got beef flavour at the mo.
And I dare say a few will think twice before they post stuff in future.
Ooh. Sounds like a challenge to me.
Logan's Run's a pretty good film, I have to say.
Yeah, especially the bit where... Oops. Don't want to get banned. 😉
Where has he resorted to personal insults then?
He is too quick to call anyone who doesn't agree with his point of view stupid, the line about reading what he writes again is a bit of a insult to the readers intelligence and I had reason to point out that he had insulted me directly three times last week.
Equally the tags are quite insulting, however there is nothing to say that TJ is responsible for this.
Simple fact is, that TJ has asked for an end to a thread which invariably descends into stupid behaviour
He has in a repeated way disrupted and sabotaged (his word) a perfectly acceptable thread. It is the mods job to moderate not TJs. Even TJ changes his argument, from a dislike of the images to a dislike of the comments while accepting the images, and I'm the one who needs to read the threads again. 🙄
so TJ's bin proveded right.
How's that? He's antagonistic in his approach and completely inflexible and totally unable to listen, really listen, to others. He would drive a saint to lose their temper. The A&A thread lives on and his personal point of view has been shown to be in the minority. If anything he has lost in that any sympathy to his point of view has been completely lost now because of his attitude.
He has gone way down in my estimations as a positive influence on the forum.
That I should be dragged into this....
First of all, just like Friday Kylie, the weekly A & A thread was dying on its feet until last week when emzs decided to comment on it and TJ jumped in with both feet. The vast majority of forum users have obviously got bored with it. By raising its profile these past two weeks, emsz and TJ have ensured that it will continue to grumble on for some time - even if it's just out of spite.
TJ did the right thing by starting a thread to give voice to those who didn't like the A & A thread. However, it is obvious from the responses that he is very much in a minority. Time then to drop it and move on.
To the ladies who are offended it by it - whether you continue to frequent the forum or not - how on earth do you cope in your normal day-to-day life when images and sexual innuendo are [i]much[/i] more prevalent than they are on STW?
For the crusaders - emsz, TJ, Elfinsafety etc - Is this really the best use of your time? If you feel so strongly about this, why aren't you picketing WH Smith, or attempting to get the law changed to have it all banned? Nah - it's much easier to sit behind your monitor and bang out a few words here, thereby salving your conscience.
As for TJ - I'm afraid that this behaviour is all so horribly familiar. Away from STW, I think TJ is a top bloke. Great sense of humour, intelligent, articulate. I'm proud to be able to think of him as a friend. Put him at a keyboard however and his forum behaviour is atrocious. We used to see this on another forum, where TJ would celebrate his "different-ness" (his signature was [i]marching to the beat of a different drum[/i]) by starting and participating in threads where he would make ludicrous claims, be hurt when folk didn't "understand" him and would then come out at the end with "sheesh you guys, I was just jesting all along". This is still known as [i]The TJ Defence[/i]. Folk there got so fed up of him that eventually he was bullied off/left.








