Forum menu
David Cameron - thi...
 

[Closed] David Cameron - thick or a liar?

Posts: 6
Free Member
 

On Scotland, apologies you are of course correct. I wonder though whether Cameron is being either stupid or mendacious by not talking about these issues in terms which accurately describe how implementation would work in Scotland.

It is possible that he is simply not worrying about Scottish aspects of any of this, because he is well aware that his party is not going to control Holyrood in a hurry and will win very few Scottish seats at Westminster. That does not have any great bearing on the attitudes of the people he is trying to win over, who are almost exclusively not Scots.

While it may not be [i]accurate[/i] to talk in the terms he's talking in, perhaps he isn't [i]lying[/i] or ignorant of the issue, he just doesn't actually much care. Or am I trying to give him too much credit? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Time for a new pledge card eh TJ?

[img] [/img]

In all seriousness - we've already got a Bill of Rights - I'd like to see that enforced fully to the letter of the law before we worry about writing a new one!


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

How about the Northern Ireland bit then? A british bill of rights? That excludes NI as it is not in britain


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:17 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Or these, maybe?
[img] [/img]

[img] ?w=468&h=624[/img]


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:18 pm
Posts: 34537
Full Member
 

wow TJs irrational bitterness toward cameron is actually superceded by the vitriolic propoganda posted by Z11 and CFH

politics really brings out the best in people


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ, sorry but this is an epic and frankly rubbish bit of trolling on your part.

I'm going to vote for the Tories this time because they are most likely in my opinion to sort out the economy.

As for the Human Rights Act you might have a point in there somewhere but consider, who was it wanted to extend detention without trial to 90 days? Labour is nothing if not authoritarian.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

McBoo - I make no attempt to defend the authoritarian streak of labour. It stinks.

I do actually think this stuff is important as it shows that Cameron is a mendacious liar and also shows his contempt for the UK countries that are not England. He also shows how weak he is in the face of the far right - as also seen in the formation of a new group in the EU by the tories.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

it shows that Brown is a mendacious liar and also shows his contempt for the UK countries that are not Scotland. He also shows how weak he is in the face of the far left - as also seen in the pandering to the Unions.

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - Can you tell me which politician isn't a liar and won't target his/her statements to target a particular part of the population if will suit their purposes?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Clubber. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Thats a tricky one for sure. Clegg? Ken clarke?

I do think this is particularly nasty and dangerous tho.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it shows that Brown is a mendacious liar and also shows his contempt for the UK countries that are not Scotland. He also shows how weak he is in the face of the far left - as also seen in the pandering to the Unions.

Pretty stupid CFH. But I expected nothing less.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

>it shows that Cameron is a mendacious liar

I'm not sure what he's lying about TJ ? You were wrong about repealing the Human Rights Act without having to leave the EU (is that lying or being thick ๐Ÿ˜‰ ). So apart from the part about the Scottish parliament requiring to give consent for a change in Scottish law (so substitute England for UK), what's he lying about ?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The thing is, I reckon that the Tories will get in with either a small majority or a hung parliament worked in their favour. Either way, I can't see them able to do anything so drastic that they'll get away with it.

Cameron is pretty lightweight but I honestly think that with Clegg being unrealistic (and I do agree that he and Vince Cable are probably two of the more honest (less dishonest!) politicians out there) he's a better choice than more labour which irrespective of what they do stand for (or at least originally did) have reached the point where they've been in power too long. A change is better than none in the current circumstances.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - since we're on the subject of liars, you recognise these words?

The EU now has 25 members and will continue to expand.The new Constitutional Treaty ensures the new Europe can work effectively, and that Britain keeps control of key national interests like foreign policy,
taxation, social security and defence. The Treaty sets out what theEU can do and what it cannot. It strengthens the voice of national parliaments and governments in EU affairs. It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. We will put it to the British people in a referendum

Note also the repeated use of the word Britain!

Now, does that mean that Northern Ireland - which as you quite rightly point out, is not part of Great Britain, can have a referendum on the Lisbon treaty?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A change is better than none in the current circumstances.

Change for changes sake is not a good idea. The Tories are not yet ready to Govern.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't say change for change's sake. I said exactly why a change is better than none at the present moment.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 1:59 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I will attack cant and humbug where ever tehy come from

.... on an internet forum about push bikes.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What is he lying about - he cannot repeal the human rights act without leaving the EU - that is clear. he cannot repeal it in Scotland - that is clear, the Human Rights act does not hinder the fight against crime and terrorism as he claims. 3 lies.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]I will attack cant and humbug where ever tehy come from [/i]

You can always tell when the brandy's kicking in with TJ, he starts to go all teh and tehy - watch out for it in his streams of blathering rhetoric.......


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ, even if the Cons don't get in, I will be stuck with that idiot as my local MP. The amount of people who are fooled by his 'everyman veneer' in West Ox is unbelievable.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]I will attack cant and humbug where ever tehy come from

.... on an internet forum about push bikes.
[/i]

Or to put it another way, I will drone on repeatedly about the same old same old, but on no account actually do anything about 'it' ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hilldodger - I do actually walk the walk as well as talk the talk - or I have done in the past. I do actually try to live by my principles and try to improve the lot of the poor, weak and those in need.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

and try to improve the lot of the poor, weak and those in need.

Sainthood awaits then.

Alternatively, I have a rather deep distrust of anyone who feels it appropriate to guff on like that.

Hey ho, keep wasting the bandwidth.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:19 pm
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

Three points:

1. Changing UK law would have an effect as the European Court of Rights as I understand it provides a margin of appreciation for national laws in its decisions. So changing national law will have an effect. Lawyers differ on how important this is, but the mere existance of such argument indicates there is a difference to be argued therefore the law is different. (Joseph Heller would be proud of that argument)

2. Having been at Oxford at the same time as Cameron I know a lot of people who studied PPE and it certainly was not the easy option populated by thick toffs. Of course there were exceptions like Ed Balls.

3. I think the use of British is fairly common to describe the whole UK, it may be wrong but it is common usage. Was Gordon Brown ignoring NI when he said "British Jobs for British Workers"?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i] I do actually walk the walk as well as talk the talk [/i]

Well can we have a bit more walking and a bit less talking then ๐Ÿ˜‰

Politics is a career as well as a vocation - bitter criticism of the exponents of the system is pretty pointless as they are only doing what will succeed with the electorate.

Better to try and put alternatives than just rant "labour aren't labour enough, and tories are too tory" - that isn't really a valid point to argue from when you never seem to actually say what you stand for other than some fluffy concept of middle class do-goodery......


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You want my personal political philosophy again? I have stated on here often enough.

Dark green pacifist co operative anarchist. I could write screeds on it but it would be rather pointless.

Over tha last decade I have vote Green, SSP, SNP and labour ( but only for Malcolm Chisholm as he is both a medic and the only person to resign a government post over Iraq)

I spend my working life as a nurse for the elderly and have been involved in trade unions and anti fascist movements. My karma is good


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 7279
Free Member
 

TJ - Robin Cook?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Dark green pacifist co operative anarchist[/i]

means nothing to me other than a semi-random list of buzzwords...

[i]I spend my working life as a nurse for the elderly and have been involved in trade unions and anti fascist movements.[/i]

So other than your paid employment and a bit of rabble rousing, nothing then...

[i]My karma is good [/i]

karma ?? sounds a bit snakeoil-ish to me


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

Don't worry about your human rights, [url= http://www.ldh-toulon.net/spip.php?article3004 ]Europe is looking after them and kicking British pocket dictators into line.[/url]


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

>he cannot repeal the human rights act without leaving the EU - that is clear.

Really ? You haven't provided any evidence to back this up.

>he cannot repeal it in Scotland - that is clear,

True - without the consent of the Scottish parliament.

>the Human Rights act does not hinder the fight against crime and terrorism as he claims.

In your opinion.

> 3 lies.

Nope.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]So other than your paid employment[/i]

As a nurse, I suspect TJ has done his bit. And then some.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hilldodger - do you really want me to explain? It is rather tedious.

Rabble rousing? When did you last do something for the good of others without reward? I did a lttle bit of good in small ways. Nothing eatrth shattering but I try to do my bit of good. Public service ethos.

Do you really think I could not have made far more money in another profession?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ....what if your political philosophy actually does more harm than good? The left doesnt have a monopoly on moral perfection you know.

Example - India I think we will all agree is finally on the right track. Is seeing child mortality rates plummet, life expectancies lengthen.....literally hundreds of millions of people being lifted out of absolute poverty and the establishment of an enormous middle class. All good stuff yes? This only started to happen when India finally abandoned bedsit socialism, embraced the global market and unleashed the little capitalists within.

What I'm saying is, some of us are on the right (I'd consider myself a liberal or libertarian actually) because we really truly honestly believe capitalism to be for the good of everyone in the long run. If you cant get past Tory=evil then there is not much point in further debate......


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

McBoo. I am not of the left. How many times do I have to say it.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mate I'm trying to be nice but really you are being a bit of a pretentious c0ck today.....

Dark green pacifist co operative anarchist

Give me strength


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

I CANNOT wait for that glaikit-looking tool to get into power, so we can return to the natural order of things in this country. Cants like him telling what's best for us, cos we are all a bit stupid to know{as a result of our inferior breeding/education}.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ta McBoo.

Those are the main aspects of my personal political philosophy.

its really too tedious to go into in detail.
Dark Green is convenient shorthand for the more fundamental side of the environmental movement.

Pacifist - self explanatory but I am also a realist about the need for the armed forces at the moment.

Co operative. Socialism without the central direction. Think Kibbutzim or Workers co operatives

Anarchist - I believe in small and devolved government and not in state control.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:10 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My vote is patiently waiting for Boris Johnson.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:16 pm
Posts: 18593
Free Member
 

How much was your combined gas and electricity bill last year TJ? Dark Green by name or nature?


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:19 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Love a environment campaign from last year 'try turning your heating down'. HA!

TJ- Im not going to vote for Cameron. Hes the same as Brown, the 'Hitler' effect. It'd be a disastrous campaign. Then Labour could come back in and say the deficit was all the Tories fault.

No. Let Labour win again- we will be in the midst of the 70's then. When the ****ups reigned supreme over us.

Maybe a Thatcher will be born again, to come and save us from Labour-idiots and their expanding idiot-public sector.


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:27 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Educator - my home energy usage is high. I live in an old uninsulated building that is listed so is hard to insulate. I have done what I can but it remains an inefficient building.

there is far more to it than home energy use. I don't own a car, I don't buy food that is flown, I don't buy new consumer goods. Its a lifestyle.

Light green is buy a prius, dark green is use your bike


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:36 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Do people not proof-read stoopid viral negative campaigning at all? ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

only after the event BD ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Good work. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 19/01/2010 3:41 pm
Page 2 / 3