Forum search & shortcuts

Dave Lee Travis...G...
 

[Closed] Dave Lee Travis...Guilty!

Posts: 78564
Full Member
 

How does one prove beyond reasonable doubt that they had their chest groped twenty years ago?

I've not really followed the intricacies of the case, but that seems like an odd one to be proven true amidst a dozen other more serious charges that weren't.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 12:11 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A serial groper. Why did it take almost twenty years when the victim had told two others?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 6:45 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh and to the ballsy men saying I was groped/get over it.

Ok- a big male boss in your company gropes your balls. How would you feel?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 6:48 am
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

Ok- a big male boss in your company gropes your balls. How would you feel?

With the other hand ?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 7:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rotherham anyone?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I suppose "Hairy Cornflake" is a bit snappier than "Ugly Sexpest".


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:16 pm
Posts: 14132
Full Member
 

Is Gazza going to bring charges next!...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i really dont understand how ones persons word against the other can produce a verdict one way or the other. what evidence is there? is it the credibilty of the witness?
would jack nicholson have more chance of persuading a jury that he was innocent or would meryl streep be more likely to convince a jury that the "perpitrator" was guilty?

i know this isnt the same now, but how do women on the gok wan show justify allowing him to touch their breasts or pose naked, or will in years to come will they complain that they were really coerced into doing it.
if Dave lee travis was guilty, then he deserves the right sentence and if he is guilty i want him to be punished. unfortunately their is still this nagging doubt.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

just a thought on fairness, what are your thoughts on this.
a man and a woman live opposite each other, neither have curtains.
if the man takes his clothes off and is naked and the woman sees him he can get done for "flashing"
if the woman takes all her clothes off and the man sees her he can done for being a "peeping tom"
funny old world


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ok- a big male boss in your company gropes your balls. How would you feel?

I'd either laugh it off or tell him to F off (depending how much of an idiot he was) and then just forget about it and get on with my life. If he did it again I'd punch him in the face and would perhaps start to look for a new job. Certainly wouldn't harbour a bitter 20 year grudge against the man though that's for sure. Unless he becomes famous of course as I could then probably make a serious sum money out of the situation 😉


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lester - Member

just a thought on fairness, what are your thoughts on this.

That they should get curtains and stop looking in other people's houses?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:44 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

just a thought on fairness, what are your thoughts on this.
a man and a woman live opposite each other, neither have curtains.
if the man takes his clothes off and is naked and the woman sees him he can get done for "flashing"
if the woman takes all her clothes off and the man sees her he can done for being a "peeping tom"
funny old world

To correct you, if a man WAS flashing he would be stood full frontal in the window trying to gain attention.

If a woman did the same she would be seen as potentially mentally unhinged or a bit of a slag.

The women of this world can't win.

I'd either laugh it off or tell him to F off (depending how much of an idiot he was) and then just forget about it and get on with my life. If he did it again I'd punch him in the face and would perhaps start to look for a new job. Certainly wouldn't harbour a bitter 20 year grudge against the man though that's for sure. Unless he becomes famous of course as I could then probably make a serious sum money out of the situation

you are very junior, wanting to make it in your career and in a prime place to get your name heard/known. Being touched and groped by someone uninvited can be distressing. Do you think she held a grudge? OR do you think she reported it at the time- i.e. to the Producer and another but it didn't go anywhere at the time. Fast forward shes called witness.

Don't get offended- a serious question: Its great when a man says 'laugh it off'. If it was [u]your Mother[/u] groped would you tell her to get over it and move on? How about your own girlfriend or wife was groped by Pervy Pete in Accounts, would you laugh and say 'what a lad'?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both could be done for indecent exposure though?

It is only attitudes that are the problem, the law seems quite clear...


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:54 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Both could be done for indecent exposure though?

If there is obvious intent. When you pee into a bush mid-ride, do you think you should automatically be done for indecent exposure if walkers walk by?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

just a thought on fairness, what are your thoughts on this.

It's pish and you should try harder. HTH.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If there is obvious intent. When you pee into a bush mid-ride, do you think you should automatically be done for indecent exposure if walkers walk by?

I don't think so no. But that wasn't really my point. I was arguing that gender shouldn't and I don't think it does, come into play when it comes to legal instruments of this kind...

...of course,law enforcement, judiciary, media and the public have a long way to catch up with this sentiment.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Invading someone's personal space by squeezing parts of them is a pretty serious assult if you ask me but in this case specifically not a jailable one.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 1:59 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jail? All options are open - that doesn't mean he will be jailed.

Peyote- even if the perpetrator is a male and seen traditionally as physically stronger?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:17 pm
Posts: 8950
Free Member
 

I don't work in accounts. 😕

Best use of CPS/police/courts time? Possibly not but the public interest case would be that high profile people can't be seen to have impunity and that time isn't a barrier to justice.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:20 pm
 chip
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On flashing,
When I used to run late at night I had drunken women flash there boobies at me and lift there skirts to flash their allens.
It did not bother me, if I had rang the police, would they have even bothered or laughed that I would even consider calling them.
What if a woman flashed everything at me, would that be more serious.

Breasts, were do they sit on the scale of indecency.
They are not genitals but are hardly your elbow.

Would a woman flashing her breasts be similar to me flashing my arse.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...of course,law enforcement, judiciary, media and the public have a long way to catch up with this sentiment.

do they?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

even if the perpetrator is a male and seen traditionally as physically stronger?

I don't think the law generalises based on gender, I would hope that individuals are treated as such, taking into account a whole range of issues including (but not limited to) physical size. I think that's what the whole "aggravating factors" thing is all about. But I'm not a lawyer.

IMO there shouldn't be any assumption based on gender, and I believe the law (as it is written, if not enacted) agrees with this.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

do they?

Are you really saying that misogyny isn't alive and kicking in society? I think it is.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about your own girlfriend or wife was groped by Pervy Pete in Accounts, would you laugh and say 'what a lad'?

I wouldn't be particularly pleased and would probably go and have a word with him one to one, but calling the police and pressing charges, really? Sledgehammer to crack a walnut springs to mind.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:30 pm
Posts: 5171
Free Member
 

When Mrs INVG was a House Officer the Senior Registrar grabbed her from behind during a ward round. She responded by taking a step back and applying all her weight on to the top his foot through her stiletto heel. Once the ensuing scream had attracted everyone's attention, including the Consultant leading the ward round, she said. 'Would you mind not grabbing my breasts Dr so-and-so, I found it rather unpleasant'. That, as they say, settled his hash. I accept that you have to be pretty self-confident to do it..


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i know this isnt the same now, but how do women on the gok wan show justify allowing him to touch their breasts or pose naked, or will in years to come will they complain that they were really coerced into doing it.

Context. 🙄


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:39 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

and would probably go and have a word with him one to one

How badly wrong could that go? Your partner has been physically assaulted and you would keep your cool depending on how he talks to you/responds?

Best use of CPS/police/courts time? Possibly not but the public interest case would be that high profile people can't be seen to have impunity and that time isn't a barrier to justice.

He was being charged on multiple counts with different alleged victims.

If my partner was groped/grabbed and she was very distressed I'd be ringing up HR for a meeting with a view to calling in the Police.

Or should I say 'pull yourself together luv, this is the noughties not the future when things will be seen as different'?

gok wan

I really do think hes a dark horse. Hes either doing it to titillate and surprise or he really is upto something!


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:39 pm
Posts: 8950
Free Member
 

Or should I say 'pull yourself together luv, this is the noughties not the future when things will be seen as different'?

No, didn't make myself really clear, I think there might have been vicitims of more heinous crimes, not perpetrated by minor celebrities, that would have had their cases bumped as resource wasn't available

Not saying the vitims of DLT are less deserving of justice but the CPS makes judgements about resources all the time and were it not for the media interest I doubt these offences would have had priority. Not saying its right, just a fact of life.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:53 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The victims- exactly. The CPS decided to prosecute on more than one case with him.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 2:58 pm
Posts: 8950
Free Member
 

But only secured a conviction on one of the (arguably) lesser charges. Pretty high risk from the CPS's point of view. Anyhoo, the guys a creep and got what he deserved. Job jobbed.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 3:02 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 3:16 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Shirley the point is that quite a few folk did suffer from more heinous crimes at the hands of a certain BBC DJ and he is now dead so in effect got away with it. It was a pretty extreme case.

With that in mind, I guess the thinking is that they go after these folks now, so that these people don't think that they are above the law in the future?

Rightly or wrongly, I suspect that is probably influencing the decisions as to whether or not to press on?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 3:22 pm
Posts: 66127
Full Member
 

rebel12 - Member

Sledgehammer to crack a walnut springs to mind.

Bit extreme that, for a first offence.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 3:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Are you really saying that misogyny isn't alive and kicking in society? I think it is.

hold on - are you saying that men are hard done by or the opposite?


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 3:39 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i] things are better now than they were. Still not great, but much better than it was.[/i]

Really? Cos I've been cat called, had my breasts touched up, and my bum. In clubs bars on the bus, walking down the street you name it. casual sexism is alive and well. Thing is this bloke refused to admit that what he did was wrong, and equality starts with showing people that even after 20 years you're still going to be punished for it.


 
Posted : 24/09/2014 4:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hold on - are you saying that men are hard done by or the opposite?

The opposite, as Emsz says.

Just to clarify though, I think the law, as it is written, is pretty clear on equality and the need to treat people equally. I don't think those responsible for enforcing and upholding the law (enforcement authorities and judiciary) work to such a high standard. It's why sexual assault, rape et al have such low reporting, and subsequently conviction rates. Society doesn't care enough.


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 8:39 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Really? Cos I've been cat called, had my breasts touched up, and my bum. In clubs bars on the bus, walking down the street you name it. casual sexism is alive and well. Thing is this bloke refused to admit that what he did was wrong, and equality starts with showing people that even after 20 years you're still going to be punished for it.

+1. I thought I was in an alternative reality on this topic until you posted that.

The oooo I wouldn't be too offended if a girl touched my crotch is abit 12yr old mentality.


 
Posted : 25/09/2014 8:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Free as a bird!


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 12:10 pm
Posts: 33257
Full Member
 

Free as a bird, sentenced in accordance with the guidelines for the crime he was convicted for, rather than the internet/media hoopla some people think he may have been guilty of.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 1:25 pm
Posts: 4111
Free Member
 

good!


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 1:39 pm
Posts: 8343
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I think thats fair enough.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 1:41 pm
Posts: 18042
Full Member
 

Well that was all in the public interest then.


 
Posted : 26/09/2014 9:50 pm
Posts: 8404
Full Member
 

I remember being in a shop in Tottenham Court Road in the mid eighties when he walked in and being extremely rude and belittling to the staff in a very loud voice, all the time looking around to check people knew who he was. A thoroughly vile and obnoxious human being, I hope he can look forward to spending the rest of his life being held in the same contempt by everyone who meets him as he had for the rest of humanity.


 
Posted : 27/09/2014 7:48 am
Posts: 826
Free Member
 

[url= https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3838/15180655469_a7d6de8083.jp g" target="_blank">https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3838/15180655469_a7d6de8083.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/90489422@N06/15180655469/ ]Dlt[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/people/90489422@N06/ ]Alpine160[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 27/09/2014 10:39 am
Page 2 / 2