Forum search & shortcuts

Bring back rudeboy ...
 

[Closed] Bring back rudeboy - please

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

only stupid people would want him back, got real sick of him calling people stupid who did not agree with him. ooops!

Was just thinking the other day that the forum was getting a little dull, what with the knee jerk reactions of the white liberal, middle aged, middle class guardian/mail reading ranting apologists that can't maintain a good argument, it's about time wudeboy was back. Supose we could then run a book on how long it will be before he's band again.

Suspect that some of the state employed guardian readers are missing the heavy argument artillary that wudeboy provided.

Do I miss his judgeMENTAL posts, or his holier than thou opinions, or the RB "World View", or his nasty snide remarks bordering on the abusive, or his "I'm not a violent person but..." posts, **** me no

Do I miss him constantly pulling the wool over non-London STW's eyes at how wonderful the NuLabour's London Social Experiment has worked, no I don't

Do I miss him accusing everyone of racism if they disagree with the bollox he spouted, no

Do I miss being amazed at how much one person can spend on STW, giving his two pence worth to every question under the sun, grudgingly yes

He did have the same lego boat as me growing up so he can't be all that bad, just a bit lost.

I bet he still spends as much time on STW as before but now spends his time drinking beer and planning an RB Revolution

Two very good posts as to why he should be brought back.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 12:55 pm
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

Just put a picture of stephanie from lazytown up, he'll soon be here!


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 12:55 pm
Posts: 23357
Full Member
 

Just wait, eventually he will appear like a boil in your nostril.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member

but I guess the NO voters will be less likely to voice their opinions.

Eh?

Why?


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

if so he's keeping a skilfully low profile!

Simon, as someone who has been banned then got a new log-on, I can assure you it's very, very easy!
If you carry on as normal, you get spotted. And people think they've been very clever for spotting you. But if you don't want to be found, they simply don't have a clue, no matter how clever they think they are. Even the mods have no idea....

😀


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:01 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

but the short man syndrome switch will one day be flicked by a thread about london, assylum seekers or riding on pavements. he will be very easy to spot when the rant starts.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can assure you it's very, very easy!

very easy to keep a low profile, I suppose so, unless you find you have something to [b]say[/b], when I imagine it becomes more difficult...

but a silent RB is no better than none 🙁


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

or chavs or do you prefer '50s Jamacain SKA to the stuff of the 80's?!

I always thought 'the lady doth protest too much' but heh! He would have described me as white, middle class and a Guardian reader 😯 So thankfully he never found out I was Oirish to boot!!!


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:15 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I've also realised that it's handy......


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

......to have a spare log-on, just in case!
😀


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have to say, I'm glad to see the back of the unctuous little bed wetter. His self-indulgent, self-absorbed, self-righteous witterings have made this forum a bit of a no-go area for a while, things can only improve now he's had his hook slung.

He's a typical left-wing thought terrorist whose only effective debating techniques are to shout down, slander, or belittle an opponent's opinion. He's a poorly educated, bitter under-achiever who tries to disguise his lack of formal education by posting in a ridiculous pseudo cockney vernacular.

His slanderous accusations of racism are perhaps his most disappointing legacy. His eagerness to 'cry wolf' to selfishly achieve his own gratification are exactly the sort of action that undermine genuine reports of persecution and in my opinion, like false accusations of rape, should be dealt with by the law.

The man obviously has some sort of personality disorder - what sort of person would spend every waking hour ranting at faceless strangers in an internet forum? From what I can gather, he seemed to have little interest in mountain biking further than riding an old bike to his place of work.

As for the Citroen 2CV analogy, I think that's a little unfair. I, for example, loathed the old Deux Chevaux, but I never felt compelled to thrash one to death with a sand wedge, defecate on its lifeless corpse, and then set it alight.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:22 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Easy to say that whan he can't defend himself though, isn't it?

EDIT
I could rip that argument of yours to shreds, by the way. I just can't be bothered.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:24 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

G-Force is StalinFred and I claim my £5


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:25 pm
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

He's a typical left-wing thought terrorist whose only effective debating techniques are to shout down, slander, or belittle an opponent's opinion

Now don't get me wrong, but isn't that right wing/bnp techincs?
His eagerness to 'cry wolf'

Probably much more acceptable than "I am not racist but..." or "Oh you fail to see that my obvious racist joke was tongue in the cheek" excuse.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:25 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

He's a poorly educated, bitter under-achiever who tries to disguise his lack of formal education by posting in a ridiculous pseudo cockney vernacular.

I disagree. RB was pretty well educated, as it happens, he just chose to disguise [i]that[/i] by posting in a ridiculous pseudo cockney vernacular.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As for the Citroen 2CV analogy, I think that's a little unfair. I, for example, loathed the old Deux Chevaux, but I never felt compelled to thrash one to death with a sand wedge, defecate on its lifeless corpse, and then set it alight.

PMSL!!! 😆


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:26 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

Now don't get me wrong, but isn't that right wing/bnp techincs?

Yes but it's exactly what he used to do.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 5655
Full Member
 

Two very good posts as to why he should be brought back.

Why? So that we can see more pointless shouting matches where neither participant has any hope or intention of changing the other's mind?


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

He's a poorly educated, bitter under-achiever who tries to disguise his lack of formal education by posting in a ridiculous pseudo cockney vernacular

Your doing what he did, making groundless assertions that cant be substantiated.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:28 pm
 Del
Posts: 8284
Full Member
 

+1 for 'no'.
sorry, but i think he's behaved like a dick in all his incarnations. a thread is bowling along quite happily until fred wades in with a post of thesis length in the style of STW's own Mike Skinner, but making less intelligent observations, coupled with a properly irritating writing style and affectation.
there's little doubt in my mind that i could enjoy a pint with him, believe it or not, but at least then you can turn round and say, with a smile on your face, 'stop talking such bobbins you ****'.
i'm not even overly keen that i'm on this thread, as i try to be just an observer in 'chat' these days, and feel that this will only feed his over-active ego, but TJ didn't think the 'no's' would poke their heads over the parapet....


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Your doing what he did, making groundless assertions that cant be substantiated.

**** me! G-Force is Rudeboy!

Welcome back! 😯


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now don't get me wrong, but isn't that right wing/bnp techincs?

[sound-like-my-dad mode]Since when did two wrongs make a right?[/sound-like-my-dad mode]

**** me! G-Force is Rudeboy!

Oh no he most certainly is not. ;o)


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

G-Force is StalinFred and I claim my £5

I think you may have it 🙂 G-Force, member 1 day...


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

**** me! G-Force is Rudeboy!

Welcome back!

Err hello, I'd already established that a few posts ago and the £5 is mine


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:33 pm
 Del
Posts: 8284
Full Member
 

Probably much more acceptable than "I am not racist but..." or "Oh you fail to see that my obvious racist joke was tongue in the cheek" excuse.

and again, exactly what bra used to do.

G-Force is Fred and I claim my £5

as your attorney i advise you to set sail in the Shark for The North at the earliest opportunity. 😉


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:35 pm
 G
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fred, give the man his £5'er then shush everyone otherwise the mods'll spot it.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've been accused of being a lot of horrendous things over the years. Being Rudeboy however, isn't one of them.

:o(


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm still trying to make sense of "thought terrorist" ...


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:36 pm
 Keva
Posts: 3281
Free Member
 

another vote to allow him back on, I've been biking with him a couple of times. He's alright and he's a good guy, lively and likeable.

Kev


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

as your attorney i advise you to set sail in the Shark for The North at the earliest opportunity

You're right, the weasels are closing in.

Unbearable vibrations.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you said you'd been to Tennerife, he'd come back and say he'd been to Eleveneriffe.

funniest thing I've read on here for...ever 😆 😆 😆


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Del - Member

................ but TJ didn't think the 'no's' would poke their heads over the parapet....

I thought they would and I thought there would be more of them - and some folk I would have said would be "No" have turned out not to be. I am actually suprised how many yes votes there are.

G-Force - Member

His slanderous accusations of racism are perhaps his most disappointing legacy

His accusations of racism were normally spot on. Its one of the most irritating things on here the subtle undercurrent of racism that runs thru many peoples posting.

There are two types of racism - the overt which is rarely seen on here and the insidious - which often is. The "I'm not a racist but" posts, the racist jokes "but its only a joke" etc etc. he shouted loudest about it but many of us dislkie it - note Cynic Als post near the beggining of this


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:41 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I've been accused of being a lot of horrendous things over the years. Being Rudeboy however, isn't one of them.

:o(

It is now..........


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

He's a poorly educated, bitter under-achiever who tries to disguise his lack of formal education by posting in a ridiculous pseudo cockney vernacular.

Thats very middle class of you. How dare he post on an internet forum, he should know his place. 🙄

Why? So that we can see more pointless shouting matches where neither participant has any hope or intention of changing the other's mind?

So what you are saying is that we should only allow "conversations" with those whose posts I've highlighted? You aren't going to change the others mind in what you call pointless shouting matches, so you have to think of your audience(everyone else viewing this thread) and pitch your points of view to them.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Rudeboy was a prat with self esteem issues, but would he really call himself an unctuous bedwetter?


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

G-Force (G-Force) Member Since July 29, 2009 (1 day)

OK, if you claim not to be RudeBoy, who were you formerly ?


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So TJ, has he been unbanned from mleh-world yet ??

Seem to remember he didn't last there very long before you kicked him off the board and burned his warehoose doon.........


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

come on then padded one, own up

@Juan - the French don't have a word for "technique"?

🙂


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:48 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I'd vote yes. He's not a bad bloke at all, he just doens't know when to let an argument go (yes, I know it's rich coming from me). He needs to understand (and care) how he comes over and also that sometimes you have to stop for the good of the community. Maybe I am pro-rudeboy because I can understand where he's coming from and identify a bit?


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:48 pm
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

I've been accused of being a lot of horrendous things over the years. Being Rudeboy however, isn't one of them.

You said the same thing the last time you got banned and came back. albeit about being padded-bra


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

No.

Although I don't care all that much - I seldom used to read anything posted by him anyway. I got to the point where I just couldn't be bothered.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Ohh, I can't help it....

Rudeboy was a prat with self esteem issues

Prat certainly, but self esteem issues? Nope.
You really should try and meet up with him if that's what you think. Big surprise instore methinks!

That's the problem with the web. You don't get to know the person, no matter how much you think you do.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but would he really call himself an unctuous bedwetter?

I thought that too implausible unless self parody


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:51 pm
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

His accusations of racism were normally spot on. Its one of the most irritating things on here the subtle undercurrent of racism that runs thru many peoples posting.

He just did this when he was argued to a standstill when his all encompassing generalisations were challenged.

I think you are possibly looking for it if you really believe it exists to such an extent on here.


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh to hell with it!!!!

I'M SPARTACUS!!!


 
Posted : 30/07/2009 1:56 pm
Page 2 / 7