Forum menu
No wonder you don’t see it, you’re on the opposite side of the same coin.
You know what, it’s been fun but I’m bored now. What’s that saying? ‘Never try to argue or reason with idiots. They bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience.’
But tom, calling someone Piers Morgan over and over again is the height of sophisticated argument and intellectual debate.
I think you're probably just not clever enough to understand it.
keep it up piers, your doing a grand job
Still working your way through the stock of Christmas and New Year booze, then; one clear symptom of a drunk is their habit of repeating the same thing over and over again, a habit I’m seeing here.
Time to go to bed, son, sleep it off.
his veganism is a complete red herring
Is it just beefed up vegetarianism?
This guy knows what he's doing. He has committed gross misconduct and knows it.
So he's taking the opportunity to gain some benefit for his cause by asking the court to establish, as a precursor to the main question (of his conduct), whether being a vegan brings rights as a belief system. That has been confirmed.
He cares not for the rest of the trial I'd guess.
In short, it's quite a smart way of getting a principle established in law.
Plants are massively complex and evolved structures and have demonstrated sentience, so why does there not seem to be a group of individuals who would seek not to eat them
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov5Jgw_Nwx4