Forum menu
Alien: Romulus
 

Alien: Romulus

Posts: 4748
Free Member
Posts: 33967
Full Member
 

It’s looking good, they used the many of the SFX teams who created the original film Xenomorphs, it’s all physical effects, and I think there are some production people who were involved with the two original films.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 8:22 pm
Posts: 13865
Free Member
 

didnthurt

The film I’d like to see is a follow up to Aliens, where they ‘gun-up’ and head to take on the Xenomorphs on their planet.

Always wanted the opposite.... one of them gets back to earth


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 8:31 pm
bigdean and bigdean reacted
Posts: 1029
Free Member
 

Few things in life are guaranteed. But these 2 are; firstly, change always comes. Second, any new Alien film will be disappointing.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 9:35 pm
mattyfez, davros, walowiz and 7 people reacted
Posts: 8177
Free Member
 

Always wanted the opposite…. one of them gets back to earth

Isn't that Alien Vs Predator?


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 9:35 pm
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

Alien, Aliens and Alien Isolation are great. The rest are terrible films. Three had promise before the studio started meddling. Resurrection was FireFly with an Alien and Prometheus and Covenant looked pretty but were awful. Honestly think Alien Isolation may be my favourite Alien thing. I’d love Romulus to be good but I don’t think it will be.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 9:43 pm
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

IMO Prometheus and Covenant both suffered from trying to build too much other stuff on top of the basic Alien premise, that mostly wasn't as interesting as Ridley Scott seemed to think it was.

I'm hopeful that this might be a more back to basics deal and I might be pleasantly surprised, like with Prey.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 10:09 pm
Posts: 9268
Full Member
 

Another prequel really.

How long before we get Alien: Jonesy. From the cats perspective.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 11:18 pm
pk13, acidchunks, silvine and 7 people reacted
Posts: 3558
Free Member
 

I've never watched any of the alien films

There, I said it


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 11:22 pm
andy4d and andy4d reacted
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

It’s not a prequel, it is set between Alien and Aliens.

Why come on to a thread about a film franchise you’ve never watched? That would be like me opening a football thread. Just ****ing weird.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 11:34 pm
acidchunks, martinhutch, Cougar and 5 people reacted
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

While scavenging the deep ends of a derelict space station, a group of young space colonizers come face to face with the most terrifying life form in the universe.

Sounds like the success of the Alien: Isolation game may have influenced this one. What's the betting that if it's between Alien and Aliens, one of the colonizers turns out to be Ripley's daughter?


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 11:39 pm
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Directors cut of 3 was good, if you've not seen it then you should. Totally different movie.

Didn't even know Isolation even existed, which one does it emulate?


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 11:58 pm
jamesfts and jamesfts reacted
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

Always wanted the opposite…. one of them gets back to earth

There are two Alien movies in production, I think the other one has a working title of Alien: Earth.


 
Posted : 27/07/2024 11:58 pm
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Didn’t even know Isolation even existed, which one does it emulate?

It's most like the original Alien, it's a (terrifying) stealth game where you're pretty helpless and being hunted by the xenomorph.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 12:05 am
Posts: 4748
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Directors cut of 3 was good, if you’ve not seen it then you should. Totally different movie.

I remember watching an early dodgy copy of Alien 3 when I was a kid, it turned out to be totally different to the released movie, wonder if it's similar to the director's cut? I might need to search that one out.

I remember the Alien 3 computer game being good too.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 12:20 am
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

Directors cut of 3 was good, if you’ve not seen it then you should. Totally different movie.

As a fan of the franchise, I despise Alien^3.  The Director's Cut is nominally less dreadful.

Didn’t even know Isolation even existed, which one does it emulate?

It's an in-universe video game. As mentioned above, the protagonist is supposed to be Ripley's daughter.  It's very good.  I borrowed it from a friend, spent two hours shitting myself, didn't see a single alien. (-:


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 12:25 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

The premise of the third film was excellent, but setting it directly after the events of Aliens doomed it completely, mainly because they had to kill off two of the main characters of the previous film before it even started.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 12:31 am
geeh and geeh reacted
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

They didn't have to.  They just did.

I think that's what doomed it for me personally.  Aliens is one of my all-time favourite films, the opening 5 minutes of Alien^3 just shits on that entire movie and goes "yeah, that was all pointless."  I was royally pissed off before the opening credits had finished.

I've since revisited it with an open mind and... it's still not good.  I'd rather watch Resurrection.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 1:34 am
funkmasterp, Akers, Akers and 1 people reacted
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Yeah it's shit in that respect but otherwise a great film. I like it, I guess someone had to.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 2:10 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Saw the trailer tonight, it has some promise and some cool visuals etc but it didn't <look> right to me. The trailer's also kind of annoyingly flashy, and intent on showing you what's probably a decent chunk of the movie's plot but cut to the bones. Like, we know there'll be facehuggers, we know there'll be chest bursting, you don't need to put it all in the trailer. it felt a wee bit desperate. I mean ffs you can get people excited just by showing a space jockey, and they know that. TBF if I'd seen it on youtube I'd wonder if it was fan-made.

But, hey, I liked 3 and Resurrection.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 5:44 am
Posts: 3403
Full Member
 

we know there’ll be chest bursting, you don’t need to put it all in the trailer

i agree. Though Alien was released back in 1979 when I was too young to see it in cinemas* and Aliens was out in 1986.  There may be an entire generation who are only aware of these things from memes and tropes rather than big screen events.

*first time I saw it on a big-ish screen rather than ropey VHS was at university film club.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 8:04 am
woody2000 and woody2000 reacted
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

I really hope it’s good but I’m not a fan of the directors other work. I found his Evil Dead remake boring. Just gory with none of the humour or creepy atmosphere of the original.  Don’t Breathe started well and the second one was awful.

There’s a script out there somewhere on the internet for the original Alien 3. Set in a monastery and has a scene in a field of long grass that one of the Jurassic Park movies copied and watered down. It seemed genuinely great and very different to what ended up being made. Didn’t the director disown Alien 3?

I think one of the big problems is that it would be hard to improve upon the first two films. They were such fresh ideas at the time. A bit like watching Predator for the first time and having no clue what it is.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 8:13 am
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

The film I’d like to see is a follow up to Aliens, where they ‘gun-up’ and head to take on the Xenomorphs on their planet. An all action film.

An even mor all action film just like the all action film it followed? The thing I most hated about Aliens was the idea that the aliens are just expendable, it stopped being this terrifying unstoppable thing that you didn't understand into a war movie. They may as well as been the hoards of the Viet-Cong they were meant to represent.

 the opening 5 minutes of Alien^3 just shits on that entire movie and goes “yeah, that was all pointless.”

while as an individual character Hicks wasn't totally shit just derivative , the death (off screen) of the cardboard cut out 'young girl' character who's entire presence in the film is just so that she can get rescued again and again was blessed relief. Alien3 is at least better than the film that came before it.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 8:20 am
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

Alien Isolation is the computer game, which I suggest you don't play in VR, unless you have some spare underpants at hand!

Video contains swearing...


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 7:05 pm
funkmasterp, JonEdwards, JonEdwards and 1 people reacted
Posts: 9138
Full Member
 

The Alien/Aliens/Alien^3 universe did produce some books that fit the bill for corporate involvement in the bringing of the bugs to earth. Spoiler, it does not go well. I used to have them at one point, but I donated them when I moved. They are not terrible and, if done well, could be a good way to continue the series.

On the new film, if it is like Alien: Isolation, it could be good. It will be scary as hell.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 7:13 pm
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

the death (off screen) of the cardboard cut out ‘young girl’ character who’s entire presence in the film is just so that she can get rescued again and again was blessed relief.

Alternatively, they could've handed off to an adult Newt and retired Ripley / had her as a mentor figure.

Alien3 is at least better than the film that came before it.

Delete your account.


 
Posted : 28/07/2024 10:58 pm
Mark and Mark reacted
Posts: 11605
Free Member
 

Didn’t the director disown Alien 3?

David Fincher? Nah, he was frustrated by the studio meddling but learned from it. Plus we got the Assembly cut (not the directors cut as I mistakenly said before).


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 12:03 am
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

Delete your account.

Aliens is a terrible film unless you're watching it after a session in the pub, otherwise it makes no sense in its own universe, and makes no sense as a film. There's a couple of snappy lines and there's some cool machinery. After that its a run of the mill war film with all the cliches thrown in.

When Hudson says "Wait, is this a bug hunt" you can turn off the movie while saying "Yes, Hudson, yes it is"

At least Alien 3 has some decent actors, and doesn't rely on bang-bang in place of a plot.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 8:13 am
Posts: 15458
Full Member
 

The film I’d like to see is a follow up to Aliens, where they ‘gun-up’ and head to take on the Xenomorphs on their planet. An all action film.

Nah, it's been done once a repeat of the same plot (marines Vs aliens) is just dirivative now. The first two are fundamentally different films with Ripley being the common thread/character, they could/should have stopped after Aliens IMO.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and actually say the bit I like about covenant/Prometheus is the idea of David a mad as a box of frogs android who's actually the creator of the aliens specifically to try and wipe out Humanity. Scott's execution of the concept isn't great, the pacing and convoluted plots don't help. But the kernel of the idea I like.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 9:08 am
Posts: 5164
Free Member
 

Looking at the cast and crew, i think it'll be a movie trying to give the fans what they want, but not quite doing it, i don't think it has the budget or backing to really do well, it was originally going to be straight to streaming as well.

As for the whole arguments, the Alien franchise has always followed the era it was filmed in, i loved Aliens because it was a proper 80s movie, everything after that has either tried to be too clever, or try and change it up, not a lot has worked unfortunately, but reality is, there's a lot more franchises out there doing similar or the same.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 10:15 am
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

not a lot has worked unfortunately.

Because the original was fine, it didn't need the alien ship explaining, or the space engineers or any of that shit. Movies work just fine without every damn thing needing a back story or an explanation or retconning. Annoys the **** out of me.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 10:31 am
funkmasterp, cookeaa, funkmasterp and 1 people reacted
Posts: 216
Full Member
 

I'm a fan of them all, including Prom/Cov. Personally I'd say Resurection is my least favourite, but also think 'standard' Aliens isn't that great after you've watched the directors cut, which adds in a lot more context. I don't really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov - i've found the whole thing really interesting and engaging. There's a good series of 6 shorts floating around on Youtube done for the 40th Anniversary too. Looking forward to Romulus.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 10:48 am
Mark and Mark reacted
Posts: 5387
Free Member
 

Alien 3 worked well as the book which was released before the film and derived from the original screen play iirc.

There's a bunch of stuff in it that didn't make it to the films & what we were left with was very 'hollywood'.

Same for alien Vs predator, some of the books, actually, all of the books are better than the films.

As for the new film I'm  purposely not looking at trailers so I watch it with no expectations.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 10:58 am
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

 I don’t really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov

I think becasue lots of folks were expecting movies that followed on from the previous set, when in reality they're more a re-boot. I like Prometheus for its themes of "who are we", "Is there a god" "why has it left us" and the Greek and Aztec religious themes. If you ignore that the previous alien franchise exists, its not bad - It has some staggering plot holes mind, so there's that, but overall, I don't hate it like some others do.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 11:11 am
Posts: 11846
Full Member
 

I don’t really know why the majority seem to be so down on Prom/Cov – i’ve found the whole thing really interesting and engaging.

Agreed, I enjoyed Prometheus and Covenant, but then I didn't go in to either film with an encyclopedic knowledge of the whole canon to date, ready to be infuriated by any inconsistencies. In fact I'd always understood Prometheus was supposed to be sort of 'Alien-adjacent' as in it wasn't supposed to be a factually consistent prequel to the original franchise.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 11:24 am
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

Aliens is a terrible film
...
At least Alien 3 has some decent actors,

But it is fun. Alien^3 is just dull. When I come to a movie like Aliens, I'm expecting Die Hard In Space not Schindler's List.

I like films, there are few I actively dislike.  But I think perhaps my view of some is irrevocably tainted by my prior expectations vs reality.  I was so excited for Alien^3, and so crushingly disappointed by it.  It's far from alone here, I paid actual money to watch Highlander 2 in the cinema for god's sake.

it didn’t need the alien ship explaining, or the space engineers or any of that shit.

On this we agree.

The thing that annoyed me most about Prometheus - aside from it being twaddle - was that the crew were supposed to be the cream of Weyland, experts at the top of their game, and they all had the common sense of a bag of grapes. The cartographer gets lost; the biologist removes their PPE before poking an alien life form with their hand; the protagonist so memorable I can't even remember her role now tries to outrun a big heavy thing by running in a straight line in front of it rather than taking two sidesteps and watching it roll on by; and so on and so forth and things of this nature.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 11:50 am
slackboy, funkmasterp, ChrisL and 5 people reacted
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

But it is fun.

Yes it is, I agree, but it has some god awful plot holes that really shouldn't be there. You could still have a fun movie if you filled them in, or just thought about it for 10 mins, becasue we're all just there for the sentry guns, right? It treats its audience like they're stupid, or that it doesn't matter, and I hate that.

Alien^3 is just dull.

It's not a video game made real, fo shure. The thing is; the reason Alien and Isolation work so well (and Alien3 for that matter) is that it gats back to the root of the thing. Single monster, you hardly see it, you're defenceless against it, and it will kill you, no ifs buts or maybes.

The thing that annoyed me most about Prometheus

The things that annoy me about Aliens: Why would Ripley trust anything the Wayland Corp tell her. Why go all the way to Hadley with just a platoon of marines, why not take a Company? Why do they all go down to the compound leaving no one on the Sulaco. Why do none of them wear the trackers that Hicks gives Ripley, why doesn't Gorman tell the Sergeant that they're under a nuclear reactor, and on and on and on...Once you start seeing them, you can't help but think it was written on the back of a fag packet.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 12:05 pm
ChrisL and ChrisL reacted
Posts: 11846
Full Member
 

experts at the top of their game, and they all had the common sense of a bag of grapes. The cartographer gets lost; the biologist removes their PPE before poking an alien life form with their hand; the protagonist so memorable I can’t even remember her role now tries to outrun a big heavy thing by running in a straight line in front of it rather than taking two sidesteps and watching it roll on by; and so on and so forth and things of this nature.

This is all movies, ever, though!

Why go in to the creepy looking cabin, why not have backup upon backup for the electric fences, why not check that your lover is ACTUALLY dead before drinking poison yourself, etc. etc.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 12:15 pm
milan b. and milan b. reacted
Posts: 15458
Full Member
 

the protagonist so memorable I can’t even remember her role now tries to outrun a big heavy thing by running in a straight line in front of it rather than taking two sidesteps and watching it roll on by; and so on and so forth and things of this nature.

'Antagonist' surely? you mean 'Vickers' (played by Charlize Theron).

The protagonist survived to the end, only to be murdered offscreen by the mad android and experimented on between films.

I liked the Vickers Character far more from the POV of someone likely to survive an encounter with malevolent Aliens, she was written and acted as competent and decisive, therefore her frustratingly stupid Death was even more annoying. she was Weyland's biological Daughter, who despised him, seemingly because he was more invested in his psychotic Android creation. a way more interesting character that Ridley bumped off before doing anything useful with...

'Shaw' The wet blanket that survives to the end of that film, only to be murdered prior to Covenant, only survives Prometheus through a string of dumb luck and one improbable surgery. That on top of all the other idiot moves by allegedly genius characters does make the film a bit of a wasted opportunity, it was supposed to be doing some world/universe building but really just fluffed it...


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 1:15 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

But Shaw is the titular Prometheus. That's her fate.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 2:10 pm
Posts: 78464
Full Member
 

The things that annoy me about Aliens: Why would Ripley trust anything the Wayland Corp tell her.

Context?  She worked for the company and then was in cryo for years.  Why would she not trust her former employer?  We don't find out - she doesn't find out - that they're shady until Burke locks her in with the facehugger.

In any case, she is sceptical.  Ahead of agreeing to the excursion she makes a point of asking, if we do this, we're going to kill it, not to bring it back?

Why go all the way to Hadley with just a platoon of marines, why not take a Company?

What do you mean by a company?  Like an army?

The official narrative is that they don't know what's there, LV-426 is a colony which went dark.  The marines are self-proclaimed badasses, they're arguably overkill even to take down one xenomorph.

Why do they all go down to the compound leaving no one on the Sulaco.

To do what?

Why do none of them wear the trackers that Hicks gives Ripley

Pass.  Are you sure they don't?  Is the issue here perhaps that he had it at all when he wasn't supposed to have (and if so, why?)

why doesn’t Gorman tell the Sergeant that they’re under a nuclear reactor,

He does, when it's relevant.  It's a plot point in itself that Gorman is incompetent and totally out of his depth.


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 3:13 pm
funkmasterp, ChrisL, funkmasterp and 1 people reacted
Posts: 15458
Full Member
 

Context?  She worked for the company and then was in cryo for years.  Why would she not trust her former employer?  We don’t find out – she doesn’t find out – that they’re shady until Burke locks her in with the facehugger.

Surely the fact that Ash was installed by the company and given orders by 'Mother' (essentially the company) that sentenced the crew of the Nostromo as 'Expendable' was a strong indicator that Weyland was at least a bit "shady". They then gaslight her in the investigation, and take away her right to work...

She's has it demonstrated that the company are a shower of bastards 70 odd years before the events of Aliens, and yet still trusts Burke on the basis of being back to LV 426 sent with some Marines, and the promise of her flight status being reinstated.

He's right, she should definitely have known better. of course that wouldn't have helped move the plot along though...


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 3:37 pm
nickc and nickc reacted
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

He’s right, she should definitely have known better. of course that wouldn’t have helped move the plot along though…

I dunno, it's totally plausible Ripley thought the weyland corp were just ignorant/dismissive of the alien problem, especially with burke playing 'good cop', but of course it was all a ruse to obtain the alien DNA/embryo/whatever to use as a bio-weapon.

The bit where the entire entorage left the spaceship unmanned and in orbit is a bit of a plot hole though, it would be more realistic it there was a sleleton crew left on the ship that kept making up excuses as to why they coldn't do an evac from the planet.

But then they wouldn't have sent Burke down to the surface either, just the Marine squad with Ripley as advisor.

But then the plot mechanism of remote piloting the spare drop ship down to escape wouldn't have worked.

Aliens is a sci-fi action film first and foremost, so some artistic licence is allowed.... I mean acid for blood, strong enough to melt through several floors? yeah that's not exacly plausible either... but so what ...?

Also...

There’s a couple of snappy lines

C'mon now its got more memorable quotes than most of the shwarzenneger films put together..

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/quotes/


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 4:11 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

 Why would she not trust her former employer?  We don’t find out

Ash tells her after they fight when she see the message - "Bring back specimen, all crew expendable" that mother tells her. Plus she's deduced that Ash has been "protecting it all along"

What do you mean by a company?  Like an army?

A company is 4 platoons. They're sending that giant warship all that way, it's carrying all that 'stuff' and its got just 10 soldiers on it? What if they need more than that? Hadley has what? a thousand people in it? What's a squad going to achieve?

To do what?

Anything they need to, if the group you send down to have a look see run into trouble/need backup. If you send down half your troops, they get into trouble and the drop ship is lost, that's a problem, if ther's no one on the ship, and everybody's on the ground, that's a disaster.

 It’s a plot point in itself that Gorman is incompetent and totally out of his depth.

That's not a plot, that's a cliché of every war movie


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 4:28 pm
Posts: 35040
Full Member
 

Anyway, Burke knows, or at least suspects, what's happened, after all he's the one telling them where to look for the alien spacecraft, and he's read Ripley's report so he knows what they're dealing with, he's not going to be going down to the surface with just 10 marines, he ain't that stupid.

Oh no wait, apparently he is...


 
Posted : 29/07/2024 4:41 pm
Page 1 / 4