Forum menu
What are the mavic ...
 

[Closed] What are the mavic equivalent of stans rims.

Posts: 14
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#5561990]

New wheel set time and can't decide whether to stick with mavic Hope hops or switch to stans rims.
What would you lot say the equivalent rims are.
Crest=
Arch EX=
Flow ex=
Cheers all.


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mavic are stuck in a mid 90's XC timewarp. Anything they do that is wide enough to take over a 2.1 tyre weighs a ton. Everything else is just too narrow to run a wider tyre at low pressure without the tyre squirming all over the place at every corner. Go wide and light! 23mm internal rim width at least!


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You appear to have already given the equivalent Mavic rims in the OP.


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:24 pm
Posts: 6944
Full Member
 

Don't think mavic do a tubeless rim that is particularly appealing - I had years of reliable use on the 819s but switched over to Stans a couple of years back and not looked back.

They do excellent tubeless wheelsets - fully built, expensive factory affairs. But just rim only I'm not sure they offer much, unless they've brought a new rim out recently?


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:37 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

I agree with G. Lager. After years of being a Mavic stalwart (and to be fair they have never broken on me) I have recently used bought a Crest and it is sooo light, still seems pretty strong, and the (tubeless) tyres inflate ridiculously easily. Won't be buying another Mavic tbh...


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:46 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

But, to answer your question, as a rough idea Crest are for XC (819), Arch for the all round trail stuff (721) and Flow for the tough stuff (823).


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:50 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

To check you get your stans rim then wrap some tape round it to make it tubeless? Exactly the same with Mavic.

Running XM719's with 2.3/2.4" Maxxis tubeless with no issue at all, Runnin EX721's (a bit heavy but bombproof) the same.

Great strong and tough wheels.


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 10:51 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

819 is sort of like a Crest. Except it's heavier than a Flow Ex.


 
Posted : 30/09/2013 11:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

821's just been launched after people had been saying it was needed for years


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 12:56 am
Posts: 14
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What;s the opinion on running stans Arch ex with tubes.
Don't really want to go tubeless but would like the weight and strength of there rims..


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 9:55 pm
Posts: 43952
Full Member
 

I run Arch Ex with tubes without any problems.


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 9:58 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Yeah, no problem running stans with tubes. Wee bit of a waste imo but it's fine


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 10:04 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers guys.Might get round to running tubeless but just CBA at the moment.. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 10:07 pm
Posts: 43952
Full Member
 

[quote=Northwind ]Yeah, no problem running stans with tubes. Wee bit of a waste imo but it's fine
If I could afford to have another set of 29er wheels lying around, I'd likely go tubeless on the Arch EX. As it is, I change tyres too often.


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 10:08 pm
Posts: 66105
Full Member
 

Yeah, same reason I have tubes in the Flows on the dh bike. Well, that and the fact that the rear one is mullered and doesn't hold air very well ๐Ÿ˜›


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stan's are a PITA to fit the tyre when used with a tube.


 
Posted : 01/10/2013 11:09 pm