Forum menu
Thoughts please on ...
 

[Closed] Thoughts please on Commencal Meta 5.5

 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Perfect ta


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 11:05 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

I think the difference is
2009 27.2 seat post
2010 31.6 seat post

nope.

2009 s/m were 27.2 l/xl 31.6

don't know about 2010


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 11:12 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wierd!


 
Posted : 05/12/2012 11:21 pm
Posts: 189
Free Member
 

my 2010 medium is 31.6 seat tube frame was a warranty replacement for a cracked 2009 and had a shim fitted so the original 27.2 seatpost could be retained.

FWIW I get on really well with mine, built up pretty heavy with pikes, double & bash, reverb, heavy duty rims and tyres brilliant trail bike but as others have said avoid <2010


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 12:06 am
 juan
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

For me a AM is a Lapierre if you are buying new.

MWAhhhhhhhahahahahaha, mind you you'll probably don't see the difference.

UT OH...Broke my hand with the 5.5 on a downhill route... What's gunna get broken on the AM ?

You're head ๐Ÿ˜‰ only kidding, the AM isn't an old git bike like the 5.5 where you can just shift weight at the back and pootle along downhill. It's a very modern and agressive bike to ride.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 7:32 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its a bicycle frame not a Fireblade sweetie. If I rode a Lapierre it'd feel LIGHTER for a start.


 
Posted : 06/12/2012 7:53 pm
Page 2 / 2