I aint bothered, I like them and our lass likes 'em. So sod you all 
Chat Forum
[closed]
Thats £73 well spent (Oakley content)
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
deadlydarcy - Member
Sometimes it's not nice to automatically type out and post one's immediate thoughts.
What? Thats what the internet's for, that and buying shyte you dont need on ebay.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Little tip for you. It's 'our' not 'are'
That will help you in your (note it's not you're) English GSCE no end.
Posted 1 year ago # -
That would, but then again IMO I wouldnt use Our lass in an English GCSE anyway.
Posted 1 year ago # -
haha, I suppose not!
Posted 1 year ago # -
R.lepecha
That would, but then again IMO I wouldnt use Our lass in an English GCSE anyway.Pics or she doesnt exist.
Posted 1 year ago # -
£73 on spelling lessons would be a better idea
'are lass' FFS
Posted 1 year ago # -
I rather like the sunglasses in the first photograph. I find their cost to be a bit silly though - one of the downside of being a brand whore. I'll tart some of my Oakley mates next time I'm in the states. However if your woman friend is enchanted with them and with you, then it's £73 well spent. Carry on.
Posted 1 year ago # -
.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I bought them cos I liked them, I'm not some sort of brand whore cos I didnt buy them for the brand
Posted 1 year ago # -
yeah, you'd have spent that much if they'd been made by 'spong' or 'glib'
Posted 1 year ago # -
Yes, as long as that name wasn't plastered all over them.
Posted 1 year ago # -
don't listen to this lot ^ they all think merrells and a new model army t-shirt is a strong look!!
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'm backing the OP on this.
Being young he's probably more in touch with fashion than anyone else on this forum.
Anyone who says £73 was a rip off obviously has to get off their assos padded, rapha embroidered sadlle of their high horse.
Viva la difference etc
Posted 1 year ago # -
Me and fashion haven't really got along untill the past few months. I use to pretty much go against fashion, but I'm getting quite into the new 'casual shirt' type stuff.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Pieface - with age comes the right to mock the young for making the very same fashion blunders that we made when we were young.
I'm only glad that the arms snapped on the chunky plastic Oakleys I bought when I was 17. If I was wearing them in my 30's... that'd be tragic.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I wear adidas eyewear products
I iz well shizzled
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'm beginning to think this might be a troll.
**** it, I've apologised to a troll.
Posted 1 year ago # -
TSY - agreed, however the more we mock them the more they stuck their fingers up.
Think about the hippies in the 60s...
We've all made our mistakes (and continue to do so) but in someone else's eyes we are old farts.
I was in a shop once where they had the same jacket on display at opposite ends of the shop. My wife was browsing near the jacket displayed opposite. I happened to try on the jacket whilst a younger guy and his girlfriend were looking at it. My wife overheard him saying that he'd changed his minds as 'A guy over there wearing a shirt just tried it on' referring to me was good enough reason to not buy it. On the other hand I should've chnaged my mind as he was wearing a hat in 25 degree heat with his jeans hanging off his bum.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Me and fashion haven't really got along...
Is that an admission..?
Posted 1 year ago # -
idave - what the hell does I iz well shizzled mean?
Posted 1 year ago # -
£73 isn't a bad price for Oakley's, the last pair I bought, Ltd. Edition Jupiters, cost me £150. The look however, is all a bit ‘Oasis’. The OP'll be wearing a ski jacket zipped up to the neck and practicing his 'simian walk' and humming 'Wonderwall', next thing you know.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I don't like Oasis. So aint going to happen.
and FYI, there T-Pain limited edition ones. Not like you'll know who he is.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I believe he was on a boat at some time. Mother****er.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Lol... (He's on a boat)
Posted 1 year ago # -
I bought a pair of cream eye jackets (i think, the fly eye ones) and I dyed my hair purple when I was around the OP's age.
R.lepecha, don't dye your hair purple, your lass will not like it. No lass will.
Posted 1 year ago # -
OP, the fact you mention T-Pain makes you just another sheep following the herd...
Posted 1 year ago # -
Fair play to the OP - slightly misjudged the first post but he's taken the inevitable roasting pretty well (IMHO
). Keep it up lad.
Posted 1 year ago # -
A group of sheep is a flock, unless you were implying he was a sheep following a herd of say cattle or wildebeest in which case I'm unfamiliar with the meaning. Thread's made me laugh though and fair play to the OP/troll.....
Posted 1 year ago # -
£73 is allright for a pair of oakleys.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Ok he's a sheep following the flock, mr Pedantic....
Posted 1 year ago # -
My genuine Oakley copies cost £4. True they're not a limited edition but on the other hand, I'm happy to wear them outside the house unlike those 3D glasses you've got there. So that's £4 well spent.
Posted 1 year ago # -
They would look good when on a boat, fo'shizzle.
Posted 1 year ago # -
That would be Mr Pedantic
Apologies Holyzeus as didn't mean to be irritating, more I just noticed the sheep:herd thing. Reckon even Shaun wouldn't wear these Oakleys though.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Mr. Pedantic actually
Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
