R.lepecha
That would, but then again IMO I wouldnt use Our lass in an English GCSE anyway.

Pics or she doesnt exist.

£73 on spelling lessons would be a better idea

‘are lass’ FFS 🙂

I rather like the sunglasses in the first photograph. I find their cost to be a bit silly though – one of the downside of being a brand whore. I’ll tart some of my Oakley mates next time I’m in the states. However if your woman friend is enchanted with them and with you, then it’s £73 well spent. Carry on.

.

I bought them cos I liked them, I’m not some sort of brand whore cos I didnt buy them for the brand 🙂

yeah, you’d have spent that much if they’d been made by ‘spong’ or ‘glib’

Yes, as long as that name wasn’t plastered all over them.

don’t listen to this lot ^ they all think merrells and a new model army t-shirt is a strong look!! 😆

I’m backing the OP on this.

Being young he’s probably more in touch with fashion than anyone else on this forum.

Anyone who says £73 was a rip off obviously has to get off their assos padded, rapha embroidered sadlle of their high horse.

Viva la difference etc

Me and fashion haven’t really got along untill the past few months. I use to pretty much go against fashion, but I’m getting quite into the new ‘casual shirt’ type stuff.

Pieface – with age comes the right to mock the young for making the very same fashion blunders that we made when we were young.

I’m only glad that the arms snapped on the chunky plastic Oakleys I bought when I was 17. If I was wearing them in my 30’s… that’d be tragic. 8)

I wear adidas eyewear products

I iz well shizzled

I’m beginning to think this might be a troll.

**** it, I’ve apologised to a troll.

TSY – agreed, however the more we mock them the more they stuck their fingers up.

Think about the hippies in the 60s…

We’ve all made our mistakes (and continue to do so) but in someone else’s eyes we are old farts.

I was in a shop once where they had the same jacket on display at opposite ends of the shop. My wife was browsing near the jacket displayed opposite. I happened to try on the jacket whilst a younger guy and his girlfriend were looking at it. My wife overheard him saying that he’d changed his minds as ‘A guy over there wearing a shirt just tried it on’ referring to me was good enough reason to not buy it. On the other hand I should’ve chnaged my mind as he was wearing a hat in 25 degree heat with his jeans hanging off his bum.

Me and fashion haven’t really got along…

Is that an admission..?

idave – what the hell does I iz well shizzled mean?

£73 isn’t a bad price for Oakley’s, the last pair I bought, Ltd. Edition Jupiters, cost me £150. The look however, is all a bit ‘Oasis’. The OP’ll be wearing a ski jacket zipped up to the neck and practicing his ‘simian walk’ and humming ‘Wonderwall’, next thing you know. 😉

I don’t like Oasis. So aint going to happen.

and FYI, there T-Pain limited edition ones. Not like you’ll know who he is.

I believe he was on a boat at some time. Mother****er.

Lol… (He’s on a boat)

I bought a pair of cream eye jackets (i think, the fly eye ones) and I dyed my hair purple when I was around the OP’s age.

R.lepecha, don’t dye your hair purple, your lass will not like it. No lass will.

OP, the fact you mention T-Pain makes you just another sheep following the herd…

Fair play to the OP – slightly misjudged the first post but he’s taken the inevitable roasting pretty well (IMHO 😉 ). Keep it up lad.

A group of sheep is a flock, unless you were implying he was a sheep following a herd of say cattle or wildebeest in which case I’m unfamiliar with the meaning. Thread’s made me laugh though and fair play to the OP/troll…..

£73 is allright for a pair of oakleys.

Ok he’s a sheep following the flock, mr Pedantic….

My genuine Oakley copies cost £4. True they’re not a limited edition but on the other hand, I’m happy to wear them outside the house unlike those 3D glasses you’ve got there. So that’s £4 well spent.

They would look good when on a boat, fo’shizzle.

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8F3UE9qFsg[/video]

That would be Mr Pedantic 😉 Apologies Holyzeus as didn’t mean to be irritating, more I just noticed the sheep:herd thing. Reckon even Shaun wouldn’t wear these Oakleys though.

Mr. Pedantic actually

Or not actually?

Are you Bono?
They look like my Gran’s Cataracts glasses!!

That’s an interesting discussion deepreddave. I’m still right though. 😉

Fine by me, Mr Goon 😉

I’ve started something haven’t i… 🙄
Yes they are awful, yes he’s following the flock and yes he’s just like most teenagers unfortunately

Man/boy buys sunglasses, he likes them, so does his other half (well no accounting for taste), decides to post on what is commonly known to be the fairest and in no way judgemental forum, and “oh my my what’s that trip trapping across my bridge”

Will this place ever cease to amuse and entertain me,

To the OP if you like them, fair play, not really my cup of tea, but then again I don’t have to wear them,

Oh and hels = milf/cougar? this thread is useless without pics

Bling innit ,I give very,very good price ……7 Euro

🙂

I still want pics of you using your lass in GCSE English

Paedo.

If they’re as optically perfect as the more expensive Oakleys, bargain. However, the frame is not to my liking, and endorsement by a rapper suggests they’re fashion Oakleys more than functional.