It is a ‘sbwa’ more commonly know as a sector based work academy which is designed to help long term unemployed people back into work by encouraging employers (who would normally not consider long term unemployed people)to give them a guaranteed interview & hopefully a job.
aye it is but really who here thinks it takes some serious training to teach someone to stack shelves?
Basically what happens is that a training provider trains a group of long term unemployed in basic skills like customer service, basic food hygene, manually handling.
they are paid to do this and I am not sure I would call them a training provider tbh. Locally it is usually A4e or similiar who only work with unemployed people giving them low level skills that dont train them for anything in particular. Often the training is exactly what the company has to legally train the staff in anyway to allow them to work and fulfill their H & S obligation – moving and handling and hygiene for example. Obviously a cost that Tesco could not meet themselves eh
The subjects covered are the ones the employer has said would help applicants get the job. This is normally a quick course that takes a couple of weeks.
We used to call this induction iirc
Then the Jobcentre arranges for those people to have a short period of Work Experience with an employer who has vacancies. This is because many of them have either not worked before, or may have never worked and have stated that this is holding them back from finding a job. In return the employer guarantees to interview those who successfully complete the two elements, and hopefully employs them!
sometimes but then again it is mandatory and we could have degree educated folk like al doing this for F all reason, it just depends. It is not bespoke to your needs
This is a voluntary programme for the unemployed.
It is slowly becomong manadatory and if they[JC+] ask you and you refuse they can stop your benefits so saying it is voluntary is not entirely true..it is on paper but not in practice.
Feel free to criticise this programme but I have seen it working very well with employers taking on people who they would not normally touch with a barge pole.
so have i and i have seen large employers use the state to pay for the training they legally need to do and exploit a steady stream of free workers for as long as the programme lasts
You may scoff at some of the ideals behind this but after meeting long term unemployed people who have got jobs through this scheme it never ceases to amaze me how getting a job changes their whole persona, even if that job is one that many others would want to do!
It depends on the person it really does. The main issue is not just lack of skills it is fundamentally a lack of jobs. It is usually between 1- 8 or 1-6 for signers to jobs so all the training in the world wont make that much difference.
they can be good schemes , they can be really poor. It depends on many factors
The work experience should be time limited though to say 4 weeks.
I dont think large employers do this to get folk off benefits they do it as cheap way of recruiting. It creates no extra jobs but it does reduce Tescos recruitment costs and they get a fair bit of zero cost labour as well…they win more than anyone else and i would rather not subsidise them to recruit folk tbh whilst making the poor and desperate and unskilled work for f all.