You're All Ugly! Home › Forum › Chat Forum › You're All Ugly! Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total) You're All Ugly! jodafettMember Sorry to be the bearer of bad news! [/url] Posted 4 years ago cheez0Member Headline fail ‘you’re’ Posted 4 years ago wwaswasSubscriber thread title fail, link fail. ugly and stupid? 😉 Posted 4 years ago jodafettMember Frantic editing going on behind the scenes!! Posted 4 years ago CaptainFlashheartMember cheez0 – Member Headline fail ‘you’re’ Overuse of capitals as well. Posted 4 years ago wordnumbMember Excessive use of exclamation marks – the message is not so very shocking. Posted 4 years ago noteethMember The top 10% of performers were rated on average as 25% better looking than the laggards Laggards make better lovers – taking their time to reach that finishing line. Posted 4 years ago wwaswasSubscriber http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-26034659 Successful professional cyclists are seen as more handsome than their struggling colleagues, according to new research. Posted 4 years ago torsoinalakeMember Successful professional cyclists are seen as more handsome than their struggling colleagues, according to new research Froome needs all the help he can get. Posted 4 years ago samuriMember I’ve never heard of any of those handsome cyclists they list. they can’t be that fast. Where’s Sagan? Posted 4 years ago binnersSubscriber Its all very well being handsome, but are they as cuddly? Eh? Posted 4 years ago MrOvershootSubscriber Well I’m handsomely cuddly, is that any good? Think I preferred this article linked at the bottom of that page. Made me feel like some hope of a better future? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23587916 Posted 4 years ago Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total) The topic ‘You're All Ugly!’ is closed to new replies.