- Why aren't fat bike wheels spoked like car wheels?
There was loads of stuff on mtbr about this. It was for offset builds where one side of spokes otherwise ended up in very poor tension. IIRC, some folk did it and it resulted in a noodly wheel. I imagine a car rim (like the one shown above) has more inbuilt rigidty than a single-skin fatbike rim.Posted 4 years agoshaggySubscriber
The nipples are designed to sit pretty well perpendicular to the rim wall. That spoke pattern makes the angle too acute. I guess you could use semi-circular cup washers, dimple the rim (like on that car wheel) or similar but I don’t think the spoke angle is really a limiting factor in the strength of these wheel.Posted 4 years agothisisnotaspoonSubscriber
Some actual weights.
TR-3 stock disc wheel, 4″ tire seat width = 14.25 Lb.
TR-3 48-spoke original wire wheel, 4″ tire seat width = 15.25 Lb.
TR-3/4 60-spoke original wire wheel, 4.5″ tire seat width = 16.6 Lb.
Morgan Supersport original 72-spoke wheel, 5.0″ tire seat width = 19.2 Lb.
And that doesn’t include the additional weight of the knock on or the much heavier splined hub Vs the 4 nuts holding the wheel onto a modern hub.Posted 4 years agocookeaaSubscriber
Next Question then;
Why are Fat bike wheels still constructed using the traditional spoked method?
If ever there was a candidate for reintroducing some version of mag wheels to bicycles it must be fat bikes, Low pressure tyres, great way of making a closed profile for tubeless use, and it’s not like anyone is using rim brakes so no need ot try and mould a braking surface into the rim profile, it’s not like using reinforced plastics and laminates in bicycle construction is frowned on these days is it…
I now fully expect someone to show me a picture of a Fat-Mag wheel and a list of reasons why it’s a shite idea…Posted 4 years ago
Some actual weights…
Fair enough, I’d always assumed they were used on old sports cars before the days of magnesium wheels because they were lighter than steel disc wheels and that Classic Motorsports page seemed to confirm it.Posted 4 years ago
I can see why people use them now, to give a car a classic look, but why were they used back in the days when classic cars were current if they were heavier than the alternative?epicycloSubscriber
Speaking from experience, old time car wheels used to crack from the bolt holes to the rim if you cornered enthusiastically (eg on two wheels) whereas wire wheels could handle it. 🙂
I have always built my fat wheels with a crossover. It makes for an extremely stiff wheel. Disadvantages are the steep angle the spokes leave the rim, and the necessity to get the wheel perfectly true before putting any tension into it – it’s just about impossible to pull them into true. The steep angle puts a lot of the pressure on just one side of the spoke hole and can cause a localised crack.
I would prefer to drill my own rims because then they could be dimpled first – although I’m not sure the alloy used in the rims would take kindly to dimpling, so that would depend on the alloy. Spoke washers are another option, but most of those I have are steel and I’m not keen on the dissimilar metals in a wheel that is likely to get dunked in salt water.Posted 4 years ago
The topic ‘Why aren't fat bike wheels spoked like car wheels?’ is closed to new replies.