Who's tried Onza tyres then?
These is what I is talking bout..Posted 5 years agoJImmAwelonMember
Ah yes the April 1991 MBUK April Fool joke. Twas a photo of a soap dish but had us all going until the May edition – the world before ‘tinternet. Bliss……full ignorance!
Panrancer Smoke on the rear, Onza Porc on the font was the choice of some Pros and all us yooff cat wannabe’s. Smoked Bacon was what we called it!Posted 5 years agoJImmAwelonMember
The original Ground Control Tyre* shed mud really well…. As soon as you hit some tarmac there it was in your face and all over anyone stupid enough to ride near you. Tioga Farmer Johns Cousins were ok retro tyres too when there was .ittle to choose from.
*Dont Specialized recycle trademarks something stupid? I have a frame with this same name and a set of shoes too. Same again with Umma Gumma tyre compound – they put it on their 120 shoes too (and it all falls off).Posted 5 years agoBigAirNigMember
Just came away with an Onza FR 2.25 120tpi today – having returned a Bontrager XR4 that I could not get to seal tubeless.
Praying this works out as I’d not heard of Onza before, but it looked like a decent tread [High Roller ish] with a 57-559 sizing for the 2.25 so plenty of volume along with my Maxxis ADvantage 2.25 rear. Sticker weight is 695g but it came in at 680g on my scales.
Currently sitting with a tube in it, to seat it on the rim, before setting up tubeless (I hope!) for tonight’s ride !
Watch this space >>>>>>>> !!Posted 5 years agoDanWMember
These old tyres have nothing to do with the new ones bar the name! Isn’t it time for an afternoon nap? 😀
I have the Ibex and Canis. Both fantastic tyres and I would rate them above equivalent Maxxis and Schwalbe offerings.
You can read some thoughts on the Canis here
The same things follow through to the Ibex, mainly the quality of the rubber compound meaning grip is fantastic and rolling resistance small enough to not notice it 😀 I used the Ibex when the trails were a mix of hardpack and mud. They are good in the mud or on trail centre style trails in the middle of winter (i.e. wet rocks and roots but not deep mud) but for properly deep mud I’d go for a dedicated mud tyre.
Try them, you won’t be disappointed!Posted 5 years agoPJM1974Member
I have an Ibex and Canis, they’re both usefully light and the Ibex is a reasonably good front tyre, but I couldn’t get them to seat tubeless so I went back to Spesh instead.
The Canis is a very quick rear tyre, but only makes sense if you do a lot of tarmac riding or if you’re using it on bone dry and dusty trails.Posted 5 years agodunerMember
After using Minions, Highrollers and Ardents, I thought I would give the Ibex a try. Got the 2.25″ 120tpi FR version which comes up between a 2.35″ Highroller and 2.4″ Ardent in size. Seem to work really well in a wide variety of condtions, faster rolling than Minion/highroller but better grip than the Ardent. Very impressed so far, only downside is the rear seems to have worn quite fast, now swapped it onto the front to get a bit more life out of them. They are made by CST(Maxxis) anyway and I would definitely recommend them if you want to try something different. Will try the 2.4″ DH version soon too.Posted 5 years agoBigAirNigMember
Went for my first ride with my new tyres last night. Surrey Hills.
Onza Ibex FR 2.25 120tpi Front
Maxxis ADvantage 2.25 60a Kevlar Rear
The Onza tyre came up lighter than package weight of 695g …. at 680g on my scales.
Measures 57-559 so chunky carcass is good.
It has a certain ‘High Roller’ look to it (tread-wise) but lighter and more accurate sizing, since High Rollers come up small/narrow – even the 2.35 HR is a fair bit smaller (52-559 I think) than this Onza.
Tried to set up tubeless without joy. Even used a mate’s compressor but the bead is too loose to allow air to hold, so ended up putting a tube in and rode with that at 35psi. Pretty loose bead is easy to put on and take off, barely needing a tyre remover. I am praying that after it’s sat in position being used for a while I can try again for tubeless, but time will tell. It would depend on one side of the bead staying put when deflating – which did not happen when I tried the first 2 times.
I found it a really confidence inspiring tyre that allowed me to pick lines I would not have done before with my Nobby Nic Pacestar (tubeless). Holds a line well on corners, not that I am the most aggressive rider, but the NN seemed vague to me, but the Onza went where I put it, which felt nice.
Although it’s a little heavier than my Nic was 80/90g plus using a big inner tube, I didn’t find it too draggy and the grip was reassuring enough to make it worth it anyhow (at least for winter).
Was a relatively dry ride, so yet to try it’s wet prowess – but first impressions are good.
I had bought it after getting a Bontrager XR4 Team issue TLR tyre that I could not get to work tubeless due to pin holes in the sidewall. PLUS that tyre comes up a fair bit narrower. I exchanged it at Evans cycles for the Onza, despite not having heard of them before…. was worth a punt and apart from the tubeless issue it could be a good choice.
NigPosted 5 years ago
The topic ‘Who's tried Onza tyres then?’ is closed to new replies.