who would arrest the queen?

Home Forum Chat Forum who would arrest the queen?

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 43 total)
  • who would arrest the queen?
  • yossarian
    Member

    Dangermouse

    Or maybe Bananaman

    Premier Icon mikewsmith
    Subscriber

    It probably won’t make front page news anytime soon though

    mostly as it’s a pile of crap and random words stuck together with tin foil hats.

    seavers
    Member

    Only one super hero is capable of this….Seaman. Not to be confused with Aquaman.

    6079smithw
    Member

    Tin foil is the new black

    It’d be pretty frickin tricky to enforce…

    the Queen is basically Gangster no.1,

    what with effectively owning The Army, The Secret Services, The Police, The Government, The Crown Prosecution Service, HMRC, The Church of England etc etc, along with ruling the commonwealth and a fair few bountiful offshore tax havens, not to mention a wealth of shares in other business concerns… she even owns all UK citizens from birth, hence the birth certificate.

    Behind her frail exterior hides a pretty convincing case for all out global badass, bling n all.

    But aye, if Chuck Norris is mumbling excuses, I’m up for a challenge

    crankboy
    Member

    No one can arrest the queen particualy not the we made it up as therapy Brussells Common Law Courts.

    Ironically enough i was just reading up on this sort of Freeman madness really nice case where one gets sloted with 9 months for contempt of court .

    konabunny
    Member

    she even owns all UK citizens from birth, hence the birth certificate.

    Ding ding ding ding freeman of the land nonsense alert!

    nealglover
    Member

    she even owns all UK citizens from birth, hence the birth certificate.

    You really will believe literally any old bollocks you get told won’t you ๐Ÿ™„

    Premier Icon mikewsmith
    Subscriber

    of all the utter balls in this thread you pick up on that bit ๐Ÿ™‚ Picking on this one is like shooting fish in a barrel.

    Ding ding ding ding freeman of the land nonsense alert!

    I want to go beyond that and be a free animal, frolicking about the countryside in the buff, foraging for natures bounty n that

    Anyhow, don’t blame me when you wake up in the middle of the night and your pancreas is missing, cos Lizzzzz felt a bit peckish ๐Ÿ˜€

    bencooper
    Member

    she even owns all UK citizens from birth, hence the birth certificate.

    Yeah, plus she owns all the stamps. Licking a stamp is technically treason, you know. And she owns all the money, cos it’s got her picture on it.

    She only owns half of me, though – I’m dual national.

    nealglover
    Member

    of all the utter balls in this thread you pick up on that bit Picking on this one is like shooting fish in a barrel.

    I ignored all of the “arrest warrant” crap. Not even worth bothering with that.

    But the “freeman” shit some people actually believe.

    Premier Icon mikewsmith
    Subscriber

    this one?

    thegreatape
    Member

    I think I heard this one at primary school. Is it Inspector Boobs?

    CountZero
    Member

    Yeah, plus she owns all the stamps. Licking a stamp is technically treason, you know

    That’s why they introduced self-adhesive stamps, so that the legal technicality is removed.

    Premier Icon molgrips
    Subscriber

    Monarchs have been arrested a few times in history haven’t they?

    atlaz
    Member

    Some people really are mental. The same international court bollocks recently convicted the entire canadian government of something enabling other nutters to declare a new country inside Canada. Batshit

    crankboy
    Member

    Molgrips not really .Charles the first was defeated detained and executed but Parliament really fudged the what ” is our authority to arrest point .” The French threw over their entire legal system to kill their king.

    I cannot think of an occasion where a monarch has been arrested. By definition an arrest is either within the law or it is not an arrest. I suppose the International Criminal Court could issue a warent for Liz but at that level it is really starting to blur the boundaries between law and diplomacy and would require an agent external to the UK to execute it.

    (Don’t make the mistake of thinking I have any special clue about this)

    bencooper
    Member

    Plus, did you know you can tell which way is South by seeing what side of her the moss grows on?

    Premier Icon MSP
    Subscriber

    iirc UK law does not apply to the queen, all powers are granted by the monarch and cascade down from there.

    It is just the way the law is written and developed centuries ago, and hasn’t been updated to take into account modern principles like “no one is above the law”.

    There was some case a few years ago, where a member of her staff who was fired had no access to the normal legal procedures due to the monarchs status in law.

    Premier Icon D0NK
    Subscriber

    what with effectively owning The Army, The Secret Services, The Police, The Government, The Crown Prosecution Service, HMRC, The Church of England etc etc

    whilst technically I don’t think she actually owns these, it did occur to me as head/figure head of some of these institutions, if they did something really naughty could the queen take some of the blame?

    konabunny
    Member

    By definition an arrest is either within the law or it is not an arrest.

    An unlawful or false arrest is a form of arrest.

    shermer75
    Member

    I’m assuming the article is by David Compan, right?

    mrmonkfinger
    Member

    I reckon arresting the surviving members of Queen would be fairly straightforward.

    shermer75
    Member

    Flash Gordon says no

    Premier Icon danrandon
    Subscriber

    Only Jonny English could get away with arresting her ๐Ÿ˜‰

    gordimhor
    Member

    The truth is out there, and this is definitely out there

    Premier Icon ourmaninthenorth
    Subscriber

    Is this written by a taxi driver? I’m pretty sure I’ve heard this level of insight and analysis from the intellectual elite of the highways.

    Maybe they’re all sleeper agents ready to overthrow the state.

    Premier Icon honeybadgerx
    Subscriber

    Sergeant Frank Drebin, Detective Lieutenant, Police squad.

    crankboy
    Member

    Konabunny no it’s false imprisonment.

    Premier Icon molgrips
    Subscriber

    I cannot think of an occasion where a monarch has been arrested.

    I was thinking of ‘arrest’ in the more general sense not the modern legal sense. Simon De Montfort perhaps?

    Junkyard
    Member

    I cannot think of an occasion where a monarch has been arrested

    Read some History books though it usually involved the tower and some family infighting as they decide who god had really chosen ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Its unlikely to ever happen and even if guilty it would be abdication etc to protect the nation

    Premier Icon BigDummy
    Subscriber

    I am reasonably sure that the Queen is quite effectively protected from being arrested on the basis of a warrant issued by an imaginary court convened by conspiracy theorists, fantasists and psychiatric patients.

    I’m no monarchist, but I’d trip one of these loons over to stop him grabbing her. Heavens, I might even do it to stop Cameron being hauled away in chains.

    ๐Ÿ™‚

    rusty90
    Member

    I’m assuming the article is by David Compan, right?

    How did you guess?

    Last Thursday Activist David Compan was released from the London Park Royal Mental Health Centre.

    A rich vein of looniness there
    Food manufacturers want GMO death programme kept secret
    Black magic cathedrals of the Knights Templar
    Beta blockers are mass murder

    and of course the old favourite
    Chemtrails are there to reduce population

    Premier Icon MSP
    Subscriber

    Given the historical development of the Sovereign as the ‘Fount of Justice’, civil and criminal proceedings cannot be taken against the Sovereign as a person under UK law. Acts of Parliament do not apply to The Queen in her personal capacity unless they are expressly stated to do so.

    However, The Queen is careful to ensure that all her activities in her personal capacity are carried out in strict accordance with the law.

    Under the Crown Proceedings Act (1947), civil proceedings can be taken against the Crown in its public capacity (this usually means proceedings against government departments and agencies, as the elected Government governs in The Queen’s name).

    In the case of European Union law, laws are enforced in the United Kingdom through the United Kingdom’s national courts. There is therefore no machinery by which European law can be applied to The Queen in her personal capacity.

    However, it makes no difference that there is no such mechanism, as The Queen will in any event scrupulously observe the requirements of EU law.

    As a national of the United Kingdom, The Queen is a citizen of the European Union, but that in no way affects her prerogatives and responsibilities as the Sovereign.

    https://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Queenandthelaw/HowUKandEUlawaffectTheQueen.aspx

    So the law does not apply to the queen, even EU law as they would be applied through UK courts.

    CountZero
    Member

    If Queeny and Phil wandered off with a bunch of kids, what were the huge crowd of people who usually surround them doing at the time?

    If the laws don’t apply to the Queen, is that also the case with Prince Charles?

    I was wondering why he hadn’t been questioned regarding his close relationship with Jimmy Savile…

    ninfan
    Member

    Damn, I seem to have lost the narrative – since when did reptilians start displaying paedophile tendencies?

    Premier Icon BigDummy
    Subscriber

    what were the huge crowd of people who usually surround them doing at the time?

    Probably too busy murdering David Kelly to notice.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 43 total)

The topic ‘who would arrest the queen?’ is closed to new replies.