• This topic has 39,835 replies, 1,030 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks ago by Klunk.
Viewing 40 posts - 14,961 through 15,000 (of 39,836 total)
  • The Coronavirus Discussion Thread.
  • Edukator
    Free Member

    I lived in Spain in 89-90, it took months to get the paperwork sorted. No idea how long it takes now but you don’t want to run past 31/12.

    fatmountain
    Free Member

    I don’t think people are going back to les bises, hand shaking, shouting into other people’s faces at close proximity in discos, sharing drinks/joints, cramming into chilly gondolas or any of the things that resulted in very high R numbers in places like Ischgul

    Damn, really gonna miss those chilly gondolas.

    fatmountain
    Free Member

    Oh in terms of Brexit? Yeah of course – I’m looking to go within the next few weeks and request a padron etc. I hope 3 months is enough even with Spanish bureaucracy.

    baboonz
    Free Member

    Oh in terms of Brexit? Yeah of course – I’m looking to go within the next few weeks and request a padron etc. I hope 3 months is enough even with Spanish bureaucracy.

    You’d be suprised.

    torsoinalake
    Free Member

    Mrs Gove

    I know they are doing it for effect, but imagine being this much of a ****.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    it’s the whole basis of either natural or vacine induced herd immunity

    Which isn’t always possible. Plenty of viruses that we live with have to be controlled through social and physical barriers to transmission long term, because there is no route to ‘natural’ herd immunity, and a vaccine isn’t available. The whole ‘herd immunity’ path just isn’t there for many viruses, and we don’t yet know if it will be for this one. The exit from this may still be improved treatment and/or concerted containment/isolation. We can and should try and aim for a/multiple vaccines, but we can’t plan for future spread of the virus based on a ‘natural’ herd immunity that may not be occurring yet, if ever.

    I know they are doing it for effect

    You’d hope so. But it might just be a genuine lack of empathy and intelligence.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    There’s always been the doubt that a vaccine can be had and how effective it might be and for how long, and if it will have to be regularly adapted to ever varying strains.

    We can look at the evolution and spread of previous viruses. They tend to get less virulent as they mutate and the population develops resistance – so less people catch the virus and less get severe symptoms.

    There may be no exit, just living with it. Long term it will probably just become yet another virus that becomes assimilated into the “common cold”.

    We’re currently in a damage limitation exercise trying to find a compromise between health, economic and social impacts. Priorities will evolve, they already have with some governments choosing courses that favour one aspect or the other in response to medical, social or economic imperatives. I don’t think there’s the will for concerted containment and the window of opportunity has in any case passed – we’re down to damage limitation.

    Gribs
    Full Member

    It’ll be lifted on Thursday, I’m sure, now Eid’s out of the way and everyone’s just ignoring it anyway

    Lifted? It’s never even been imposed. Legislation to back up their guidance may or may not appear next week. I suspect it’ll be mainly ignored by those they were targeting either way.

    binners
    Full Member

    I suspect it’ll be mainly ignored by those they were targeting either way.

    Anecdotal evidence would suggest it’s been comprehensively ignored by pretty much everyone, on account of it being a completely nonsensical load of old bollocks.

    But then this isn’t about the government doing something, it’s about them making it look like they’re doing something so that they can subsequently deny all responsibility for it. It’s just blame-storming

    Boris and chums obviously think we’re just a bunch of thick northern peasants.

    Yeah, well not so thick that we didn’t all see straight through this bag of shite

    ElShalimo
    Full Member

    So what’s the odds on Cummings’ Govt reversing the northern (not Eid related honest Guv) restrictions by Friday?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    And where will the next set of restrictions be announced for? This could roll around the country… the PM’s “whack-a-mole” analogy suggests this is likely to be short spells of applying and removing restrictions on an ongoing basis for areas all over the country (but I’m guessing not London).

    binners
    Full Member

    So what’s the odds on Cummings’ Govt reversing the northern (not Eid related honest Guv) restrictions by Friday?

    They’d have done it on Saturday, but that would have looked a bit too obvious. They said they’d review it every 7 days, so it’ll be ‘as you were’ on Thursday

    And where will the next set of restrictions be announced for

    At a guess, I’d say the next place with a large population of brown people who fancy having a bit of a get together

    Wherever it is you’ll still be encouraged to go out for a pint if you’re the right colour

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Interesting the Andy Burnham’s request to re-impose shielding requirements has been dismissed by downing street.
    Another demonstration that johnson and his clown circus are completely divorced from reality – and the north.

    frankconway
    Full Member

    More idiocy in the form of floating ideas via the media to gauge reaction:
    – lockdown the over 50’s…not enough police in the UK to enforce that one and guaranteed to lose swathes of tory support
    – lockdown london and use M25 as some sort of border? more bollocks.
    Neither of these will ever be heard of again.
    What we should do is…test, trace and isolate – and repeat; that should have happened from mid-march.
    Dump Serco.
    Use and build on the expertise which we have in public health.
    I will continue to use my common sense (not johnson’s british version of common sense), avoid the great british public, practice good hygiene and ignore johnson and his clown circus.

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    frankconway

    I will continue to use my common sense (not johnson’s british version of common sense), avoid the great british public, practice good hygiene and ignore johnson and his clown circus.

    Absolutely, couldn’t agree more.

    inkster
    Free Member

    Frank,

    I think the government has been watching too many movies during lockdown.

    The over 50’s idea sounds like a remake of ‘Logan’s Run’ and the Locdown London idea was surely inspired by ‘Escape from New York’

    Did anyone else see ‘Apocalypse Now’ on telly last night?

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Locking London down was dismissed way back when it would actually have made a difference, so it stands to reason that they’ll float the idea now.

    ElShalimo
    Full Member

    @inkster – I watched X-Men Apocalypse last night. I think Cummings is Apocalypse

    I’m hoping that Angela Rayner is Jean Grey. She’s ginger, moody and may possess unlimited powers (if only Starmer/Xavier could train her to harness them).

    Larry_Lamb
    Free Member

    So what’s the odds on Cummings’ Govt reversing the northern (not Eid related honest Guv) restrictions by Friday?

    Well when you look at the governments own data there’s only a couple of boroughs that have a small spike recently but the rest are flat, dropping or always low.

    So I’d say highly likely.

    Whats the next non white big event so we can plan when the next lockdown is and where?

    nickjb
    Free Member

    In my wee galloway town if you dont wear a mask then you dont get into shops (signs saying No Mask?-No Entry)

    In the Lake District last week I didn’t see anyone challenged for not wearing a face covering. Not once. Anywhere.

    Not sure what response is best. In my local co-op they had a message on the tannoy saying that mask wearing was compulsory but there were many medical exemptions so don’t worry if you see someone not wearing a mask and don’t confront them. It would be a shame to stigmatise those with a genuine medical need. Its still pretty easy to keep a good distance from others in most situations.

    amodicumofgnar
    Full Member

    Interesting the Andy Burnham’s request to re-impose shielding requirements has been dismissed by downing street.

    The irony is people shielding in busy tourist towns were probably at less risk during lockdown as there weren’t really many people about. Now the tourists are here it’s pretty much baton down the hatches.

    I think the government has been watching too many movies during lockdown.

    I thought Dom got some of his best ideas by miss understanding fiction. That Christmas job advert being a case in point. Unfortunately he hadn’t grasped that the person he used as an example would be totally allergic to his spun up world not want to work in it.

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    Playing Devils Advocate slightly but…

    If the data was correct showing that these northern areas had worryingly high numbers of infection (and they’ve been talked about since Leicester lockdown and some had other measures) and if there is a high population of Muslim/BAME in parts of those areas, and if they had allowed unlimited travel for extended families from around the country for Eid, leading to the infection being spread around the country amongst the BAME communities that we know are worst affected by the virus….

    Would we be all up in arms about the government allowing big meetings among the community most at risk and allowing the spread?

    A whole lot of “ifs” in there, and I’m not intending to defend poor decision making and woeful communication, but it occurred to me that not banning travel and meetings may have proved an equally bad policy.

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Mrs Gove

    I know they are doing it for effect, but imagine being this much of a ****.

    dannyh
    Free Member

    Sarah Vine is vile and ugly.

    On the inside and the outside.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    I’m not intending to defend poor decision making and woeful communication

    When did they have the data, how long have they know when the event is, why did they announce the changes 3 hours before they were due to kick in, and before they’d written them or passed legislation for them? It’s all very kafkaesque, and “imagine if they did nothing” is no good excuse for doing something in such a poor manner. Arse and elbow come to mind.

    The thing that gets me most is that there is no extension to the support for people shielding in these areas… don’t meet family and friends… but get out there and back to the workplace… how does that work?

    why did they announce the changes 3 hours before they were due to kick in, and before they’d written them or passed legislation for them?

    Because they are incompetent. We all know that.

    “imagine if they did nothing” is no good excuse for doing something in such a poor manner.

    So they should have done nothing and caused a big spike in BAME deaths rather than try to prevent it, no matter how half-arsed their actions were?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    They are destroying trust in their advice with their actions… that in itself will have a death count. They should have acted in a timely, legal and clear way. That would have saved lives. Last week’s panicky rule changes, that still haven’t been legislated for, were and are counter productive… for everyone… including practising Muslims.

    fossy
    Full Member

    Thanks to the idiots, my Mrs can’t even see her mother in the Nursing Home – by seeing, I mean standing in the car park, whilst her mum is wheeled to a window and they ‘talk’ over skype. Can’t even do that now. FFS.

    We’ve been doing all we need to, not been out to the pub or shopping, just out for essentials. Working from home etc. The Govt need local measures not just a whole area, as infections are low where I live, and from general observation’s everyone is behaving. I’ve three colleagues who live in and around Oldham, and they stay away as no-one is following any rules there.

    dazh
    Full Member

    I’ve three colleagues who live in and around Oldham, and they stay away as no-one is following any rules there.

    As Kelvin said, no one is going to follow the rules if the rules themselves are not clearly communicated and have a clear and rational justification. Publishing rules via twiter late at night or via leaks to Peston and Kuensberg, based on data that no one can see with precious little explanation is going to get the reaction and response it deserves.

    At the moment the UKs covid response planning is at the level of a banana republic dictator issuing random and self-serving dictats to cover up for the fact that he hasn’t got a f****** clue what he’s doing.

    somafunk
    Full Member

    nickjb :

    In my local co-op they had a message on the tannoy

    Congratulations….you must have a reasonable sized co-op, like i said my town is tiny, and you can walk from one side of our co-op to the other in 4 large strides, doubt they’ve got a tannoy either, same goes for our small tesco express but folk are thankfully still following the one in/one out routine otherwise they get asked to leave, other shops around the town are exercising their right as shop owners to refuse entry if no mask. We have not had anyone testing positive for covid in our town yet and want it to stay that way.

    Tourists are very welcome here as Dumfries And Galloway relies on the tourist industry as there is **** all else in this area for employment, come, enjoy the area but dont be an entitled dick

    binners
    Full Member

    At the moment the UKs covid response planning is at the level of a banana republic dictator issuing random and self-serving dictats to cover up for the fact that he hasn’t got a f****** clue what he’s doing.

    Indeed

    At this point on proceedings, I don’t think I’m alone in weighing up the government ‘advice’ and asking a couple of simple questions

    Q) Do I think they are genuinelly prioritising mine and other citizens’ best interests?
    A) No. Of course not. Just look at their track record. They couldn’t give a flying ****

    Q) Do I think they know what they’re doing?
    A) Definitely not. Don’t be ridiculous! Again… just look at their record

    So I’ll be making my own rules up, thanks. Seems like an awful lot of other people have decided the same. In our case, as we’ve both got parents who are shielding, this will involve being extra cautious, but I’m sure that many, having asked themselves the same couple of questions will conclude ‘**** it! I’m going to the pub with all my mates’

    Whats coming out of government has always been dubious and IMHO self-serving/arse-covering, but after witnessing the shambles of the Greater Manchester lockdown over the weekend, what they now say has absolutely zero credibility. They’re a bunch of clowns, flailing around in a ballpool

    Chew
    Free Member

    It would have been useful if they had published this on Thursday:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51768274

    And then say anything over x cases per 100,000 get conditions attached. I think Germany use a 50 cases per 100,000 measure.

    Its all about grown up conversations

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    Publishing rules via twiter late at night or via leaks to Peston and Kuensberg, based on data that no one can see with precious little explanation is going to get the reaction and response it deserves.

    I totally agree. I’ll just make sure I give it the response that vulnerable people in my local area deserve, rather than being an arse.

    binners
    Full Member

    Its all about grown up conversations

    Talking of grown-ups:

    Tony Blair has just been on Radio 4 (regarding John Hulmes sad death) and was immediately followed by an interview with Matt Hancock. The contrast couldn’t have been more glaring.

    Whatever your political allegiances and your opinion of him personally, I just wish we had a government that appeared vaguely like they knew what they were doing. It seems an awful long time since we’ve had that.

    This lot are a bunch of complete imbeciles who are totally ill-equipped to deal with something of this magnitude and are just winging it, as Boris has done his entire ‘career’.

    somafunk
    Full Member

    Sounds like Hancock has his finger on the pulse

    Here’s the health secretary, Matt Hancock, speaking about the up to half a million coronavirus tests that could be carried out daily by the end of October.

    “could be carried out” ??????????, shouldnt that read “will be carried out”?

    Just when i think the level of contempt i hold for the government couldn’t sink any lower

    binners
    Full Member

    Here’s the health secretary, Matt Hancock, speaking about the up to half a million coronavirus tests that could be carried out daily by the end of October.

    I think we can file that alongside the ‘world-beating’ track and trace app which we were assured would be in place at the beginning of June, yet here we are two months later with no sign of it and the whole privately-contracted, multi-billion track and trace system a complete shambles

    They are utterly and completely incompetent

    somafunk
    Full Member

    Perhaps we need Pritti “vacant” Patel to play the numberwang game

    Priti Patel: ‘there have been 300,034 974,000 tests carried out

    binners
    Full Member

    In the meantime, yet more millions of taxpayers money being dished out to Dom’s mates without any tendering process

    Tory-linked PR firm granted £3m Covid-19 contract without tender

    These are the lot who were responsible for renaming the official Conservative party Twitter account “factcheckUK” on the run-up to the election and setting up a false Labour party website peddling misinformation.

    TiRed
    Full Member

    Very low probability or reporting zero deaths… Expect to see a slight upturn this month

    TiRed
    Full Member

    15000

Viewing 40 posts - 14,961 through 15,000 (of 39,836 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.