Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 178 total)
  • What defines a 'Supercar'
  • jimjam
    Free Member

    Pigface

    Isnt the answer undriveable and impractical, the GTR can be used every day and in any real world sceanrio beat a F40 Veyron et al into a cocked hat.

    It wouldn’t though. A GT-R is 600+ Kilos heavier than an F40. Power fro the F40 was stated at 480bhp but many were dyno’d at 520-550bhp. American versions all had more boost to compensate for slightly heavier fuel cells to comply with safety regs. The GTR’s 4×4 and clever launch control give it that 0-60 time but above 100mph a veyron will trounce it and an F40 would destroy it on the track with modern tyres and brakes.

    FunkyDunc
    Free Member

    Ground breaking/cutting edge performance and technology

    What about Noble’s and Ginetta G60 ?

    digga
    Free Member

    Pigface – Member
    Isnt the answer undriveable and impractical, the GTR can be used every day and in any real world sceanrio beat a F40 Veyron et al into a cocked hat.

    Even the best supercars are certainly about style over pure substance – mobile posing pouches.

    Pigface – Member
    Scenario wet night in Mid Wales you have to get from Builth to Machynlleth as fast as you can, weapon of choice would most probably be an Imprezza or Evo for 99.9% of the population.

    Used to do a lot of track days and always tried to avoid SubarEvos, not because they were bad cars, but because I came to observe a phenomenon which I think equates to them allowing drivers to travel at higher speeds than they naturally have talent for. When things go beyond the chassis’ limits, all bets are off. In about 7 or 8 years, I only ever saw one car on its roof in a gravel trap. I saw quite a few others of them beached in the kitty litter too.

    BigJohn
    Full Member

    Isnt the answer undriveable and impractical, the GTR can be used every day

    A friend of mine had an Aventador which he drove nearly every day (if he could get the keys off his wife). Yes it was a bit unreliable. His only gripe was it was such an uncomfortable and harsh ride. When he opened the garage one day and decided he’d prefer to drive the 10 miles to Wolverhampton in the 8-seater Viano van he got rid.

    Pigface
    Free Member

    jimjam happily ignoring the real world scenario 😆

    digga yes they do flatter a driver of that there is no doubt.

    PJM1974
    Free Member

    Supercar = Teenage bedroom wall poster material.

    Back in my youth, the Countach was king, especially if it had a massive spoiler on the back. Regardless of whether it’s a pig to drive with a recalcitrant transmission, service intervals measured in weeks, windows you can’t see out of and mouse-fart ventilation it’s not about the practicalities of ownership. In second place was the Testarossa, beloved of the Outrun & Miami Vice generation, followed by the Porsche 959.

    If I had the money to own any of them, I still wouldn’t bother. They all belong on a wall in the 1980s IMHO.

    jimjam
    Free Member

    Pigface – Member

    jimjam happily ignoring the real world scenario

    Ack well, yeah. In the real world a Smart car will trounce a Koenigsegg for ease of use in Tesco’s car park.

    Speshpaul
    Full Member

    “the Countach was king” yes it was and still looks mad, but have you ever had a really good look at one, open the doors engine bay etc?
    the engine is a beaut, but the car is just terribly made. Shocking. even by 1970’s standards, even by 1970’s Italian standards, its bad.

    Supercars moving bench mark, a NSX is because it was in its day. But not against todays supercars.

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    So the GTR isn’t a supercar then?

    I guess there are subjective elements too, as impressive as a GTR is, it just doesn’t stir up the same emotions as a Ferrari or Lambo, it doesn’t look particularly exotic (dull, imo) and come on, who is impressed by ‘Yeah I know it isn;t a Ferrari, but it is cheaper, more economical and had a bigger boot!’

    As a fuzzy haired, tall, tv car journo once said, supercars have to embody sex and violence, though looks and power. The GTR is 1 for 2.

    ir_bandito
    Free Member

    Here’s a question, does anyone frequenting this forum own anything that could be honestly described as a “supercar”?

    jimjam
    Free Member

    Nissan’s supercar.

    peterfile
    Free Member

    It’s got to be stupidly fast and completely impractical for doing anything other than going stupidly fast.

    A friend has (amongst others) an Enzo and a 599. The 599 is for taking his mum to lunch. The Enzo is for trying to make his passengers lose theirs.

    I’ve no idea whether either is a supercar, but I’d far rather do a longish journey in the 599, which makes the Enzo a wee bit impractical as a road car, which maybe means it’s closer to supercar territory than sports car.

    P1 and the like is definite supercar to me, simply due to technology etc…but that contradicts with my earlier statement because it’s apparently quite nice on the road too!

    Love this video…It’s a new thing 🙂

    [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kb8tGX-HPQE[/video]

    LoCo
    Free Member

    Here’s a question, does anyone frequenting this forum own anything that could be honestly described as a “supercar”?

    Have TDI Passat (it is the ‘sport’ model) 😉

    DezB
    Free Member

    I had one, but my mum gave it to a jumble sale along with all my 2000AD comics. 🙁

    benp1
    Full Member

    There is no clear definition anymore, just like the definition of various road and mountain bikes types have blurred

    Supercars should make you smile when you see them
    Hypercars should make you gurn

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    If its a Nissan it’s not a supercar, I don’t care how fast it goes or how much it costs 😉

    michaelbowden
    Full Member

    LoCo – Member

    Here’s a question, does anyone frequenting this forum own anything that could be honestly described as a “supercar”?

    Have TDI Passat (it is the ‘sport’ model)

    But aparently molgrips one is more powerful than yours…. 😳

    moshimonster
    Free Member

    Lol, not the guy in the Golf Estate R thread’s 911

    You’re quite right, a 911 4S is nowhere near exclusive enough to be called a “supercar”. You can buy a new one for less than £100K (just), a decent low mileage used one for around half that, only around 400 hp, but top class handling, brakes etc, Still better to drive than a lot of actual supercars.

    legend
    Free Member

    Nah jimjam’s right, the R390 belongs…… even if they just built enough (1 of each variant) to get past homologation rules

    molgrips
    Free Member

    you have to get from Builth to Machynlleth as fast as you can

    Just been told a story about my wife’s friend who was persuaded she wasn’t in labour by Shrewsbury hospital so went back home, only to find as they got back in the door that she was, and the baby had turned. The ambulance drivers were determined not to have to deliver the baby so they managed to get to Shrewsbury hospital in 15 minutes. It’s 30 miles of A road! Apparently some kind of record.

    Actually.. that’s an average of 120mph.. I suspect that story’s been massaged a bit, or she lived closer to Shrewsbury than has been related…

    anything that makes molgrips nervous

    So pretty much any car with you petrol head hooligans driving…

    Pigface
    Free Member

    So who can build “Supercars” then? are we going to trot out the Italians? Lets not transpose “character” as unreliable and prone to catching fire.

    moshimonster
    Free Member

    LoCo – Member
    GT3?

    Surely not. No more than an M3 GTS etc

    Where do you draw the line then? A GT3 RS 4.0 is most definitely a supercar by any standard. A cooking GT3 probably borderline, but I’d say it is. Have you driven a 991 GT3?, it’s pretty f****** awesome.

    Nothing based on a cooking saloon/coupe can really ever be called a supercar. An M3 GTS certainly isn’t. It might have “supercar” performance, but it’s not actually a supercar in my book.

    njee20
    Free Member

    You can buy a new one for less than £100K (just)

    I thought they were less than £90k? If that counts as ‘just’, can I have £10k please?

    jamesfts
    Free Member

    Lets not transpose “character” as unreliable and prone to catching fire.

    You mention Italians then perfectly describe a TVR 😉

    Pigface
    Free Member

    TVR struggles to be described as a car 😆

    epicyclo
    Full Member

    Is this a supercar? – a Lambo with a Citroen 2CV body 🙂

    I’ll race your Ferrari across a muddy field…

    wilburt
    Free Member

    Something with no place on a public road.

    moshimonster
    Free Member

    I thought they were less than £90k? If that counts as ‘just’, can I have £10k please?

    991 4S PDK – base price £91K + metallic paint £800 + sports seats £1500 + sports chrono £1376 + tracking system (compulsory on insurance) £1140 + Bose sound £1000 + telephone module £558

    Already fast approaching £100K and not even got started on the full options list. Most of these cars are delivered at over £100K.

    It doesn’t matter though because it’s not a supercar according to STW.

    lilchris
    Free Member

    So the GTR isn’t a supercar then?

    No, it’s a saloon carYou can question it’s worthiness of supercar status all you like, but what it’s not, is a saloon car.

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    The Special Seal Of Approval from:

    jimjam
    Free Member

    moshimonster – Member

    LoCo – Member

    Where do you draw the line then? A GT3 RS 4.0 is most definitely a supercar by any standard. A cooking GT3 probably borderline, but I’d say it is. Have you driven a 991 GT3?, it’s pretty f****** awesome.

    Nothing based on a cooking saloon/coupe can really ever be called a supercar. An M3 GTS certainly isn’t. It might have “supercar” performance, but it’s not actually a supercar in my book.

    IMO you don’t draw the line based on performance at all, that’ll always be changing. You can dismiss the M3 GTS out of hand because it’s based on a coupe. A GT3, awesome as it is, is (just) a track focused 911 regardless of how fast it is.

    In 25 years time will we look at it the way we currently view the 959? Certainly not. Today’s 911 Turbo will trounce a 959 but park them side by side and see what attracts the attention.

    You wouldn’t look at a 348 Competizione as a super car today.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    ir_bandito – Member

    Here’s a question, does anyone frequenting this forum own anything that could be honestly described as a “supercar”?

    Oh lord no – In the dim and distant past (okay the early to mid 2000’s) I worked in asset finance and specialised in expensive cars for our region – yes some of the things Ferrari, Lambo and the rest squat out do end up in the garages of properly rich people and lottery winners but the vast majority of them end up with ‘merely’ wealthy people who obsess about the colour and the options and the point in it’s life cycle the mileage and the service history etc etc etc not because they’re ‘fussy’ about them per se, but because the money involved is stupid and buying the wrong one at the wrong time can cost you fortunes – when they get them they agonise over it’s care and well being, they’re terrified of actually using it because mileage kills the value, but it’s not nearly as expensive as servicing the things or heaven forbid putting tyres on them.

    People day dream about racing “Builth to Machynlleth” or whatever but you simply can’t, you’ll be banned for life if you’re caught going alone at what they’re capable of, unless of course you find out you’re not as capable of what your Ferrabo is and you hit someone then you’ll go to prison.

    Nor can you actually use them as a ‘car’ because the whole point of a car isn’t to leave home, drive about for a bit and drive home again – no usually you need to go somewhere and you can’t leave a supercar parked outside Aldi, not because someone might steal it or hurt it – even “nowadays” that’s a pretty rare thing – no it’s the fear of it that holds you back.

    You might think “track day” and your insurance company will say “not on our policy” you’ll need to pay a lot more for that, and if you do you’ll be burning through tyres, clutches and depreciating it at such a horrible rate that the point of those non-road legal track day cars suddenly makes itself known.

    The vast majority of my customers back then bought a 430, or a Gallardo or 911 GT2/3/RS or whatnot, spent 6 months not sleeping at night worrying about it and “got out of it” – they’d lose £20k – £40k in the process and in return got to spend the rest of their life telling people about the time they had a Ferrari.

    The ones who kept them and changed them for another one a few years later fell into 2 groups, the ones who kept them in their garage and looked at them and did 2000 miles a year and the ones who spent the summer weekends cruising around at 20mph desperately trying to look nonchalant as they looked for people looking at them.

    I got to drive quite a few, admittedly not very quickly or for long, they’re not as ‘otherworldly’ as you might think and ultimately it’s still only ‘driving’ which is pretty boring – honestly riding a MTB hard is twice as exciting as any supercar.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    There’s a chap who can occasionally be seen sat in his Ferrari in Asda carpark whilst presumably his wife shops. Sometimes he starts it and rawrs it up a bit.

    Asda! 😆

    LoCo
    Free Member

    How many bags of shopping can you get in a 430?! Perhaps they’ve got good deals on bubbly 😉

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    Presumably we now have to do a secret greeting now Slowoldman? Or was that just the I-Spy Club?

    (How)
    “How” sounds like Jack Hargreaves.

    Anyway – enjoy this bit of nostalgia.
    http://www.mikemercury.net/pilotslicence.html

    Pigface
    Free Member

    I wish Surfmat hadn’t flounced, he could quote performance figures for “super cars” then abuse you if you didn’t agree with him 😆

    rebel12
    Free Member

    Would far rather have THIS than a Ferrari or any other Supercar, Ferrari performance with room for 2-3 bikes in the back. In fact I’d rather have one of these over almost any other car. Absolute bargain too, and £14k buys you a good one.

    nickc
    Full Member

    Supercars by definition are things to stare at rather than drive. An example:

    Lambo frequent use rose jointed suspension pieces that have a service life of about 800 miles. A trip to Scotland and back, would need the suspension stripping and completely rebuilding. You couldn’t, for instance drive to the south of France in your toy, as you’d invalidate the service intervals. But that doesn’t matter, as Sir would have his Lambo either shipped to, or dive his other lambo once he is there.

    No Porsche can ever be a supercar, simply by dint of the fact that when you want to start them, they mostly start…

    No Nissan, Ford, Lexus, Honda car can ever be a supercar. (no mainstream manufacturer, in other words)

    Has to make your girlfriend resent going out in it, because a) it won’t get there, b) you won’t/can’t hear what she saying, and c) if she wears a short skirt, everyone at the restaurant will see her knickers.

    Thems the rules.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    rebel12 – Member

    Would far rather have THIS than a Ferrari or any other Supercar, Ferrari performance with room for 2-3 bikes in the back. In fact I’d rather have one of these over almost any other car. Absolute bargain too, and £14k buys you a good one.

    Riding mate of mine has one, shat it’s gearbox 2 months after her bought it and cost him 3 grand to fix – perhaps they’re supercars after all 😉

    Steve77
    Free Member

    I think by definition a supercar can’t be made by a mainstream high-volume manufacturer, so the R8 isn’t one as it looks like every other Audi:

    The Lexus IFA is the exception that proves the rule.

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 178 total)

The topic ‘What defines a 'Supercar'’ is closed to new replies.