Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 45 total)
  • Well done Sustrans!
  • konaboy2275
    Free Member

    Rode into work this morning on quiet tree lined cycle routes (NCN6) which make up approx 80% on my 17 mile commute. A section has been closed (Outwood trial near Prestwich meaning the last few weeks have been spent using the (lethal) road through Whitefield). They’ve tarmacced the outwood trail which although not very good for MTBs was fantastic on my kaffenback this morning, swooping through the trees without worrying what the big diesel engine behind you is doing!

    So, a big well done to Sustrans!

    LadyGresley
    Free Member

    It’s open again? Good oh! It desperately needed something doing to it, it was ridiculously muddy. Must ride up that way again soon.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Nice. Proper Sustrans NCN routes are fantastic aren’t they.

    Can I humbly suggest you show your appreciation by either becoming a Sustrans supporter or even better by volunteering as a Ranger for your local section of the NCN?

    Then you can give some love back and help others benefit.

    😀

    Fresh Goods Friday 696: The Middling Edition

    Fresh Goods Friday 696: The Middlin...
    Latest Singletrack Videos
    LadyGresley
    Free Member

    Can I humbly suggest you show your appreciation by either becoming a Sustrans supporter or even better by volunteering as a Ranger for your local section of the NCN?

    Too late, I’ve been a Ranger for over ten years – in different places. 😀

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    They’ve tarmacced the outwood trail which although not very good for MTBs

    An understatement. 🙁

    Something needed doing, but it could have been done with a bit more sympathy for the surroundings.

    I look forward to some of the Strava times that will be set on it. 😉

    konaboy2275
    Free Member

    Yep it was a mub fest even after a few weeks of dry weather! Don’t hink it is officially open but the barriers have been moved so went through anyway. The official date to reopen was 24th May I think.

    Graham, I did volunteer for a while but with family commitments I can only do the really local stuff.

    konaboy2275
    Free Member

    Harry, it’ll be an inch deep in leaves, horse crap and dog eggs soon! Plenty to avoid to keep you occupied 😆

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Graham, I did volunteer for a while but with family commitments I can only do the really local stuff.

    No worries – I’m pretty much in the same boat. Fortunately the path I’m a Ranger on is my commute to work so I can keep an eye on it fairly easily even if I can’t make other events too often.

    houndlegs
    Free Member

    As a ranger,what do you actually do,I’ve had a(quick)look on their website,but can’t seem to find out. I think I might like to do this,depending on times,locations etc.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    It strikes me as a bit of a missed opportunity where they had to spend a lump of cash before the end of the financial year. A group of us rode bits of it on Monday and it is a real shame that no thought other than “flatten and cover it” was used. Does it see enough commuter traffic to warrant a 10ft wide tarmac runway, or could they have kept it to 5ft and just improved the drainage on the other side of the tarmac away from the horsey bit?

    Whatever, it is done now and it is better than doing battle with the traffic in Whitefield.

    I just hope that they done carry on the Autobahn style “improvements” through Waterdale.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    On re-reading that I sound like a right moaning sod… but somebody has spent a great deal of money, time and effort getting the infrastructure in Waterdale, Drinkwater, Philips and Hurst Woods sorted over the last few years and the Outwood Trail bit that links it all together is clumsy.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    As a ranger,what do you actually do

    Depends how much time you have and how involved you want to get, but the basic Volunteer Ranger commitment is:

    Summary of tasks
    As a ranger you will be expected to carry out agreed tasks from your local volunteer group plan. Some tasks can be organised by the whole group. Your tasks include:

    check for missing or broken signs and replace
    follow the signing guidance
    carry out general tidy ups and clear back
    encroaching vegetation
    report any major issues to your Volunteer Coordinator
    attend group workdays and signing rides
    look after any artwork or mileposts on your route.

    Skills required

    self motivated to carry out tasks independently once directed
    work well within a team
    live close to or travel regularly along your allocated section of route.
    commitment to sustainable travel

    Time commitment
    At a minimum to check your section of route once a month and report this to your Group Coordinator. Communication is essential to your role, so you must take the time to attend group meetings and activities to keep up-to-date with local developments and your group plan.

    That’s about all I manage, but others also get involved in training, active travel plans, leading rides, etc

    terrahawk
    Free Member

    My two cents:
    It’s a bag of shite.

    Sorry. Too many straight lines and tree loss for me.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Turns out not everyone likes to commute to work or go to the shops via winding muddy singletrack. 😀

    I don’t know the area, but from the photos it doesn’t look like a prime mountain bike track has been lost.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    Turns out not everyone likes to commute to work or go to the shops via winding muddy singletrack

    True. But, to make up a number, 99% of the users don’t commute on it as it links the prime mountain bike tracks in Philips/Waterdale with the bits in Hurst and the canal network at the other end. They have spent a ton of cash building something that the majority of users don’t want or need. A commuter route was needed, but they could have left some of the trails that weaved through the trees in rather than driving a bull dozer though the lot of it.

    Walkers won’t like it either as the two options are to walk in all the horse shit or risk it on the superfast and dead straight bike trail.

    How much better would it have been if they had left 4ft at the edge just gravelled and left a few bumps and jumps?

    10/10 for the idea. 2/10 for the implementation.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Well (and again I don’t know the area of the trail in question) the bottom trail looks better to me.

    Okay it is a bit stark at the moment, because they’ve obviously had to chop back the plants and undergrowth a bit to lay the surface, but that’ll soon fill in.

    But, to make up a number, 99% of the users don’t commute on it

    But surely that may change now that it is surfaced? I wouldn’t commute on a trail that looked like the top photo either. Especially if, like the OP, it was a substantial part of a 17 mile commute.

    Walkers won’t like it either as the two options are to walk in all the horse shit or risk it on the superfast and dead straight bike trail.

    How much better would it have been if they had left 4ft at the edge just gravelled and left a few bumps and jumps?

    You think the walkers would have liked it better if the trail was half the width and had people leaping about on mountain bikes right next to it??

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    if it’s a new trail centre: it looks a bit dull…

    if it’s a sustrans route: it looks chuffing ace!

    D0NK
    Full Member

    I recall you being unhappy with the results harry, TBH I wasn’t sure what the problem was, it wasn’t a “fun” trail before just a wide muddy mess. From the pics I see what you mean about it could have been done better, smaller tarmac track and something a bit more interesting to the side. Will ride it on the way home tonight (have been sticking to the other side of the river lately), see what I think.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    As a commuter route it is superb. But it is a commuter route that links 3 off road areas so a little bit of joined up thinking could have been used making it much better.

    Whatever, it is done and you can now get from Radcliffe ASDA to a footbridge in the middle on nowhere without getting dirty. 😉

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Not sure I’d want much narrower than that for a Sustrans route.

    Got to have room to safely pass someone pushing a baby buggy, riding with their kids or towing a child trailer.

    shermer75
    Free Member

    Big fan of Sustrans here, happily paying the monthly stipend 🙂

    boxfish
    Free Member

    As well as benefitting cycle commuters, it looks much better for disabled access too.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    t is a commuter route that links 3 off road areas so a little bit of joined up thinking could have been used making it much better.

    Perhaps there are more developments to come? Have you spoken to your local Sustrans reps or bike campaigner folk?

    pilgrimbob
    Free Member

    Am I missing something here?

    Should this not read Well Done Bury Council? (or not depending on your point of view)

    No mention of Sustrans in the press release.

    If you do like it maybe you want a job in Local Government rather than as a Sustrans Ranger.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    It would be great for disabled access and pushchairs apart from it being in the middle of nowhere and terminating at a singlefile footbridge complete with all of the barriers, on the top of this viaduct, before dropping down the side of it into a trail centre.

    There is nothing at one end of it for a couple of miles. No shops, no houses, no parking. Nothing.

    Apart from the new MTB trail centre that somebody has just spent upwards of £250k on.

    Right tent. Wrong desert.

    bails
    Full Member

    I agree with GrahamS. That looks good. The one near me changes surface from loose gravel to concrete to ‘plain’ metal cattlegrids to wooden bridges back to loose gravel, normally during the bends (that have been put in to keep the route ‘interesting’?).

    Hitting a patch of deep gravel halfway round a corner while on 25mm slicks is definitely interesting, not sure it’s a good thing though!

    Edit: I obviously don’t know the local context…

    STATO
    Free Member

    The problem i have with this type of ‘upgrade’ is the abrupt edge, i appreciate the need to keep some height to support drainage but that just leaves a significant drop so any cyclists on it will be wary of straying near the edge, pushing them towards other users (walkers?).

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    Have you spoken to your local Sustrans reps or bike campaigner folk?

    No. But when they did the trail centres they consulted the local riders (including me). I suspect this has been done by the highways dept with a grant from somewhere and that the parks dept didn’t have any input.

    I’m ranting now so I’ll leave it. What they have done has sorted the mud and the drainage but blown all the character. With a bit of thought and maybe a bit less tarmac it could have been better.

    luffy105
    Free Member

    I’d love to be able to ride a route like that to work.

    Very jealous

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    Sorry, but that’s completely over the top.

    If riding from Radcliffe, it was always the left hand side of the trail that was muddy – the right hand side was actually quite fun, mostly hardpacked dirt that stayed pretty dry had a couple of interesting bits through narrow older gates and a little bit of rooty, narrow trail. It was lovely.

    They could have easily ‘improved’ the muddy bit and left the bit used by cyclists and runners alone.

    The lower track past the garden centre already offered a cleaner, dryer alternative route, which could have been nicely integrated into the network without too much trouble.

    Hell of a shame, tbh.

    I just hope that they done carry on the Autobahn style “improvements” through Waterdale.

    Hmmm, ‘Well, we’ve built you a bike trail, so what are you complaining about?’

    The trail that goes past the top of the berms next?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    You can see why Local Authorities get confused and frustrated by us lot:

    Cyclists complain about muddy, rough, unsuitable route.

    Authority improves route to practically B-road standard.

    Other cyclists complain that they liked it muddy and rough.

    😀

    shermer75
    Free Member

    Haha! 🙂

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    Well, it’s not that simple, is it?

    There is a perfectly good alternative route, running parallel to the one above that would have been much more suitable (it’s already tarmac, just needed refreshing) and could have been linked into the network.

    Not all the route was a muddy mess.

    Yes, something needed doing, but not this.

    I’ve said this before in my last post, but it obviously wasn’t read, so I’ll leave it there.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    There is a perfectly good alternative route, running parallel to the one above that would have been much more suitable (it’s already tarmac, just needed refreshing) and could have been linked into the network.

    But who owns the land on that alternative route? And the land between that route and the existing NCN6?
    And who will pay for the re-signing and re-mapping?

    There is often more to consider than just “lets use that path there”.

    And if the other route was a perfectly good alternative and this one goes nowhere then are the council lying when they say “Feedback from cyclists shows that the route (NCN6) is popular for commuting”?

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    You can see why Local Authorities get confused and frustrated by us lot:

    That is the weird thing. When the new (and excellent) trails were planned in Philips some of us were invited in by the council to discuss it and review the tenders that had been submitted. We were later asked to go for a sneaky ride before it was open to pass on our thoughts on grading, and finally they asked us to organise the opening ceremony which I know a couple of hundred people off here attended. The people behind the trails are a great bunch who communicated with the users and have built something that is very good and very popular.

    I bet this was done by another department whose brief was. 1) Make it dry. 2) Make it maintenance free.

    3) Make it fun. Wasn’t considered.

    _tom_
    Free Member

    Looks good to me, if I was commuting on that route I’d be much happier with the new improvements.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    But who owns the land on that alternative route?

    United Utilities own the other road. Which is probably why it wasn’t used.

    STATO
    Free Member

    Rusty, there are guideline that have to be followed about track widths etc. so just doing half the track might not have been possible, also its quite conceivable that they thought leaving a dirt track alongside would serve no purpose.

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    United Utilities own the other road. Which is probably why it wasn’t used.

    Fair enough.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 45 total)

The topic ‘Well done Sustrans!’ is closed to new replies.