Home › Forums › Bike Forum › Waterproof boots for flat pedals with 5-10 grip levels
- This topic has 42 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by chiefgrooveguru.
-
Waterproof boots for flat pedals with 5-10 grip levels
-
mudfishFull Member
External conundrum. It’s pretty soggy riding in 510 impacts with all the puddles just now. Sealskinz do help but more water resistant shoes would be nice.
Simone mentioned some bargain Columbia boots last year, but Amazon delivery was like 6 months away and now they list at £115.
Have any decent waterproof shoes or boots appeared this year? I don’t heed 45 North levels of warmth. Just something like the 510 Sam Hill Impacts with a good wide toe box. I do like the secure grip of 510 rubber. Recent 510s are pretty narrow for my wide toes sadly.1welshfarmerFull MemberVauDe Moab STX mids.
Stood in 3-4 ” of water for 30 seconds the other night and feet still dry as a bone. And they are now 3 years old and still in good nick despote very hard life.
bikesandbootsFull MemberThe Moabs aren’t 510 grippy, but good enough for me.
However the wide padding around the foot hole soaks in water. Waterproof socks a must. On a long ride you end up with trapped water around your foot, which squelches if you walk. At least it’s the same water so warms up rather than constant fresh cold water passing over your waterproof socks cooling you down.
TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTRFull MemberI wear 5.10 Trailcross GTX with long Sealskinz and waterproof troos/drysuit
That said, if it’s really minging out, I’ll generally take the ebike, so I can get away with full waterproofs and not be too sweaty
hatterFull MemberThe Goretex Shimano GF800’s that launched last year look like pretty much the ultimate solution to this problem.
Has anyone got any experience with them yet?
submarinedFree MemberThe Trailcross categorically do not have the wide toe box the OP is after unfortunately.
I gave up and am trying to learn to ride in SPDs to open options. Either that or I wear half size too big Freerider Pros with knee length Sealskinz, as the shoes drain quite well.
1nixieFull MemberThe Columbia boots are not waterproof, not grippy and the sole is too flexible for MTB IMO. I have a set and they are great for dog walks and watching kids sport when it’s cold but rubbish as an MTB shoe.
inthebordersFree MemberI and pals have run the Five ten trail cross GTX’s for the past few years, but I don’t have wide feet.
What about Endura’s new offering?
sharkattackFull MemberI was wearing regular Five Ten Trailcross high tops with waterproof socks from Aldi all weekend in sideways rain and massive puddles.
I had Five Ten grip and warm, dry feet.
I sized up in the shoes and I keep them specifically for horrible weather and thick sock days.
nixieFull MemberOn the waterproof sock front knee high ones do a much better job. On a recent trip in Wales that involved several miles of deep water splashes and wide a well above axle river crossing I was the only one wearing knee high socks and the only one with dry feet at the end of the day.
1singlespeedstuFull MemberFiveTen Trailcross GTX are indeed very narrow.
I had to go up a size and a half then use a shoe stretcher to get them to fit.
I tried some of these last year.
Very waterproof, very warm, grip as good as a fiveten sole, good stiffness to the feel of the sole, wide enough to fit my feet in my normal size.
But some of the detailing became unstuck after a few rides. I sent them back and they repaired them but that was towards the end of last winter and they’ve not been worn since.
The next few weeks should see how well they last as I’ll be using them again soon.
Impressed with them other that the small fault that was hopefully a minor issue.
2VanHalenFull Memberi go for waterproof trousers, sealskins and a shoe that drains water.
I had waterproof shoes once but that horrible ‘my feet are constantly in a puddle’ feeling is minging. this is only an issue if you do a long ride in proper horrible rain though – so not that often.
2tonFull MemberThe Columbia boots are not waterproof, not grippy and the sole is too flexible for MTB IMO. I have a set and they are great for dog walks and watching kids sport when it’s cold but rubbish as an MTB shoe.
rubbish…… the columbia fairbanks are better than any cycling shoes i have ever used in 40 years of cycling.
mated with some good wool socks are warmer than a pair of 45nrth wolvehammers i wasted £200 on.
flex in a shoe also keeps blood pumping around your foot and aids warmth whereas a rigid soled shoes doesnt.
not as grippy as 5-10s but grippy enough for the last 10 years winter riding for me.
TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTRFull MemberI’ve never tried Fairbanks, so those that have are far better to judge, but this doesn’t look like the ideal sole for flat pedals
stevomcdFree MemberLeatt do an all-weather flat pedal shoe as well. No idea if they’re any good, but they look the part. Had my eye on a pair for a while.
https://leatt.com/int/product/shoe-7-0-hydradri-flat-v23?selected-color=black
singlespeedstuFull MemberA mate tried the Leatt shoe up there and said the grip from the sole was terrible.
nixieFull MemberI’ve never tried Fairbanks, so those that have are far better to judge, but this doesn’t look like the ideal sole for flat pedals
It’s not and does not grip well at all. Fine for pootling but not for anything else. It’s better than say a walking boot that narrows at the instep but only because it is flat there.
better than any cycling shoes i have ever used in 40 years of cycling
You must have used some crappy cycling shoes then as this does not reflect my experience at all.
mated with some good wool socks are warmer than a pair of 45nrth wolvehammers
I’ve not tried any 45nrth shoes but the Bontrager winter (admittedly SPD) boots are warmer than the Fairbanks for me (though they are useless on flats).
chakapingFull MemberFiveTen Trailcross GTX are indeed very narrow.
Are they the same sizing as the standard Trailcross XT, does anyone know?
I’ll just be wearing those with waterproof socks this winter though.
hijodeputaFree MemberEtnies culvert mids are brilliant. Really grippy and waterproof. Not as narrow as my trailcross either. Best replacements I’ve found for my old 5 10 karvers
2goldfish24Full MemberI’d say the five ten freerider EPS is a good waterproof shoe. I wear normal freeriders in summer then switch to the EPS version when it gets cold and/or wet. They’re fully wind and waterproof. I think they’re a wide toe box. “EPS” is the important distinction for the waterproof version, also available in an “EPS mid” version which is a mid-height boot – which I wish I had as the regular version is too low to stop water ingress.
mudfishFull MemberAppreciate the advice all
VanHalen (and other sealskinz lovers). Yeah I’m thinking that’s worth another try as I have the sealskinz socks and waterproof trousers.
Vaude look good bit are pretty costly and the cuff would likely prevent my ankle brace.https://m.pinkbike.com/news/introducing-a-new-style-of-ankle-brace.html
anazing brace if you have dorsiflexion issues.
mudfishFull MemberI’ve a US based pal who sears by Altra Lone Peak mid waterproof boots for the bike.
Altra are big on “foot shape” shoes – I have a few of their running shoes for day to day / light hikes etc. soles might be a bit thick for me tho.Mister-PFree Memberhttps://www.freewheel.co.uk/shimano-clothing-gf8-gf800-gore-tex-shoes-varbgf800g
If I rode flats I’d be looking at a pair of these I reckon.
1kelvinFull MemberAre they the same sizing as the standard Trailcross XT, does anyone know?
Nope. Much narrower. I sent mine back after trying them on.
Went for Freerider Pros instead, which are more foot shaped, and keep most of the wet filth out.
I also have EPS (both shoe and mid) for when it’s cold. They don’t keep water out though, and take a week to dry.
RamseyNeilFree MemberThe trouble with the Five Ten <b>trailcross gtx is that they don’t grip like most Five Tens as they have a different sole compound. As said they also come up narrow in the toe box and it’s quite difficult to get into them as the velcro flap is quite tight. That said the question is why can’t someone take the design used successfully by cleated waterproof shoes and put a flat pedal sole on them?</b>
2TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTRFull MemberConversely to the above post, I don’t struggle for grip or struggle to get the GTX on my feet
matt_outandaboutFull MemberWhile we’re on it…
Insulated and water resistant flat pedal boot suggestions please.
And they need to be in size 3…So far I think the Vaude Mid Winter and Fizik Artica..?
1mick_rFull MemberI do keep wondering what these would be like for grim conditions (sole isn’t perfect I know) but not in the UK shops to try on. Mens and womens down to size 3.
nixieFull MemberThat said the question is why can’t someone take the design used successfully by cleated waterproof shoes and put a flat pedal sole on them?
Probably because it would still look like a cleated shoe, therefore uncool and would not sell so well.
Flat pedal shoes are also typically quite a bit wider.
BillOddieFull MemberThe answer is long waterproof socks, a boot dryer and your normal preferred flat pedal shoe but 1/2-1size bigger.
JonEdwardsFree MemberHas anyone tried the Endura boots? Available in clip & non clip formats…
https://www.endurasport.com/mt500-burner-flat-waterproof-shoe-black/14876424.html
https://www.endurasport.com/men-s-mt500-burner-clipless-waterproof-shoe-black/14876390.html
They look about the right kind of thing, but I don’t really want to guinea-pig them given Endura’s rep for weird sizing and variable QC…
mudfishFull MemberIm gonna try see if I can get a try on of freerider eps mid somewhere around brighton.
Shoe dryers are a great idea, but my 5-10s only just got dry using those, 4 days later.And the Sam Hill Impacts are pretty good at not soaking up TOO much. Cripes. They are far better than my old originals but still got rather waterlogged.
The heaters do reveal if your shoes stink a bit too. My missus was blaming the poor cat!I once washed 510 impacts and the daft cardboard inner sole crumbled. Given that, some stinking seems inescapable. Halo kit refresher spray does help but (pads and helmet too) not entirely banish the pong. God knows what it’s doing to my lungs tho.
1NorthwindFull MemberI’d absolutely, massively recommend against the Five Ten EPS. It seems to be for “american winter”, brilliant in a really cold, dry day, snow and ice. But barely even water resistant never mind waterproof. You can have wet feet after literally one fast puddle, it’s really noticable that they describe it as “weather resistant”. I plastered mine with waterproofing stuff and that raised them up to “nearly good enough” but they’re still not great. And as a bonus, the insulation doesn’t work well when wet either so once you’re wet you get cold too. Oh and to cap it off they are slow to dry. They are IMO utter shit for the UK frankly.
Ironically the Freerider DLX is more waterproof (but only comes in a low fit), if they’d used the same upper on the EPS it’d be a much better shoe. DLX + long trousers can work really surprisingly well, but they need to be properly long trousers so they always hang over the shoe.
I quite like the Five Ten GTX but found them clumpy and lacking in feel, plus like others I find actually getting them on and off a battle. Sizing is very important with these I think and I’m just not quite the right shape for them, maybe. But having a proper bootie is a huge bonus in really wet conditions, especially when the water’s coming down not up. Ironically my main beef is that they’re too warm- I’d love to wear them more for pissing wet spring/autumn/failed summer days but they’re just too hot for me in anything but cold weather. And in cold weather I prefer my Columbias. So they’re a near miss in a lot of ways but a million times better than the EPS, and just occasionally on a cold AND really wet day they shine.
nixie
Full MemberThe Columbia boots are not waterproof, not grippy and the sole is too flexible for MTB IMO. I have a set and they are great for dog walks and watching kids sport when it’s cold but rubbish as an MTB shoe.
Are they the Fairbanks Omnis you have? Because I have 2 pairs of those and love them, absolutely love them. IME they’re ironically terrible for walking, the mud grip is inadequate. But they are decently waterproof, maybe one step short of goretex but better than most, and they stay warmer when wet becasue of the barrier layer. The grip is IMO fine, better than a lot of mtb shoes I’ve had. The tread pattern is all wrong but the rubber has decent grip on pins (I’m on Nukeproof Horizons mostly, obvioously grip can be quite pedal dependent)
I can definitely see they’d be too flexible for some people though. For myself I hate stiff clumpy soles and even more so in bad weather, I like the amount of feel and feedback these give when everything’s orrible. I suspect a fair amount of the grip comes from the softness?
I have a set of the Five Ten GTX as I mentioned but I far prefer the Columbias except when it’s really wet. For a dry/dryish day with a lot of water on the ground, they’re by far my favourite shoes. Again, too hot for anything but cold weather but it feels like less of a drawback than the Five Ten GTX. I’ll be pretty much living in these again for the next few months of tweed valley slop.
2RamseyNeilFree MemberTotally agree with northwind<i> regarding five ten freerider EPS. Totally sponge like for water resistance </i>
mudfishFull MemberHey Northwind. Thanks. I’m getting tempted
How are the Columbia’s for size. Do they come up small or large?
is a uk 10 like a normal UK 10?
I can’t get my wide feet into the recent 510 offerings like the GTX boot, so I guess I’d need the wide fit ones.AlexFull MemberWhat @northwind said about the Freerider EPS. Like a gremlin. Do not mix with water 😉
I have the original Vaude Moabs. Six or seven years old and while a bit clumpy and heavy, they absolutely do the job of keeping your feet dry when it’s wet and horrible. First item selected during our winter Gap ride which is always wet/snowy/hail-y or all three. Do pair with a thin waterproof sock and waterproof trousers for those ‘might be doing breaststroke’ days.
Also have Trailcross GTX. And wide-ish feet. Pretty much relegate the Moab’s to really wet days. I would rate the grip as pretty good, way lighter/flexier than the Moabs and keep the water out until it’s pouring in above the ankle. May have bought the wider ones – can’t remember but they are into their third winter. Stuck them on tonight and had toasty, dry feet.
NorthwindFull Membermudfish
Full MemberHow are the Columbia’s for size. Do they come up small or large?
is a uk 10 like a normal UK 10?I think just pretty normal? They’re definitely wider/more relaxed then the five ten gtx,but I think a bit narrower than a normal freerider, if that’s any use.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.