So, can someone explain something to me, this chap has said some things which don’t stand up to even the slightest bit of logical scrutiny, which means one of three things:
1> he hasn’t thought any of it through, done any research etc. blah blah blah – basically being demonstrably incompetent as his ‘job’
2> he believes these things he says would work – basically demonstrably batty, ergo not fit to do his ‘job’ and possibly requiring medial care.
3> he knows it’s bonkers, knows it’s unworkable and has no intention of following through on it – basically lying his backside off (some might argue no different to any other politician then…) for some press exposure.
So which is it?
In any kind of employment there are normally competency and disciplinary policies in place to deal with all 3 cases, sadly I doubt any such policies exist, let alone are enforced in politician land 🙁