Are you trying to post this link? to the graphs.
As you can see in Table Excel charts and the first new Transition Scout has a performance very similar to the Transition Patrol, but being models with different routes reading the results must also be something different. Effectiveness of pedaling for example is identical, with a percentage of Anti-squat about 100% with a standard 1×11 transmission and a plate of 32T. In a Patrol installation will always be heavier and an average user probably will mount a 30T or 28T, so that the percentages of Anti-squat and Pedal-kickback up a bit. In the case of the Scout plate 32T is very well chosen and the performance is flawless. The Brake-squat (43%) is also very well done, the FSR system has lots of variants and most often have fairly low percentages, but has managed to optimize Transition for a very low value.
In the graph of Leverage Ratio see how the system is the linear-progressive type (2.5-2.55-2.3). The operation is again identical to the Transition Patrol, a system with a very soft … progressivity In the case of the Patrol this is a small problem that you “forced” to mount a high-end damper (Sensible, Progressive, with regulations HSC …), but in the case of the Scout’s leverage ratio is quite correct, there are models of this type (120mm-140mm) a little more progressive but also there are more linear and shock absorber RS Monarch Debonair of 190x51mm is well chosen, so that the operation will be very good. Obviously it could be improved with a CCDB Inline, but it is a must …