• This topic has 281 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by jimmy.
Viewing 2 posts - 281 through 282 (of 282 total)
  • Traffic Cameras – why not?
  • STATO
    Free Member

    squirrelking – Member
    I must have missed your original point then, I saw a stripped out version that gave some sense to my comment.
    As you were then…
    POSTED 7 HOURS AGO # REPORT-POST

    That’s the problem with long threads, you can’t type detailed context in every response but if you don’t someone will pick apart a tiny detail to try and prove it wrong despite a general overtone of context. Here we are talking about traffic cameras (thread title) and discussion moved to speeds (on the roads – context), so you said a car soon 200mph on a salt pan is safe… 😆

    jimmy
    Full Member

    https://m.facebook.com/groups/220834201349298?view=permalink&id=1019643878134989

    Just seen this on the Facebooks. This is what I’d like to do as a job… Yeah that’s it, cry it out. Idiots.

Viewing 2 posts - 281 through 282 (of 282 total)

The topic ‘Traffic Cameras – why not?’ is closed to new replies.