it's plain for everyone to see that the tories won. No majority, but have still won
Backhander you need to run that by me again they won an election without gaining a majority…didnt all the parties win then by that standard? 😯
They got 2.1 MILLION more votes and 48 more seats
that is not even a majority of those who could be @rsed to vote let alone the electorate
. Ie Tories have the PM. Theyhave the most seats. Agreed they may not win the various votes within parliament. ONLY Now do I hear that its possible that 2 parties can get together and because they have more seats in total do they have the PM. Am I confuse/dim or totally effing furious. Lets say I voted LL. Its because I want them in. Not one of the others. If my LL vote went, say to labour, which put them back in I would be furious.
you cant be PM if you cant win votes in parliamnet hence why GB is PM untill he resigns or a no confidence vote. By convention the PM then resigns and/or an election is called. Cameron alone cannot win a vote of confidence so he is fecked basically. I don't really get your LL point = which party are they?- I go for you are confused personally
If any party should have the right to be part of a govt, it should be one with the most votes/seats (whichever) BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES THAT THE MOST PEOPLE WANT.
the problem is that MANY more people dont want them to rule than do want them …you seem to overlook that little inconvenient truth and the fact that combined lab/lib have more. We areall guessing as to whether lib dems voters would rather have a lab or a con government
Dont get me wrong here I think all parties have some sort of moral claim here but Dave is the best initally. He wont pay the price the Lib Dems ask for so I cant really see how this will pan out.