It’s Friday, I’ve not asked recently, but any chance of some Kylie pictures. TVM

Kylie? Grannyporn

Kylie? Grannyporn

Nah, she is younger than me!

yossarian – Member
Kylie? Grannyporn

Whatever floats your boat. But I defo prefer Kylie!

Kylie Bax?

Wallace 1492, thank you very much 😀

Droooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool…………

No problem Pig Hitter. Is her label showing?

Is her label showing?

Not sure, could do with another picture for comparison purposes, honest 😉

She is old and used … 🙄

Chewkw That is both weird and rather offensive… 👿

Do you mean you only find young virgins attractive? ❓

You not got Google Pig Hitter?

LIKE

Stoatsbrother – Member

Chewkw That is both weird and rather offensive…

Do you mean you only find young virgins attractive?

Nope. I rather them single and not attached as I don’t like looking at someone else “property”.

You not got Google Pig Hitter?

I was at work at the time and ‘Access Denied’ for anything with a hint of skin on it, at home now and all is well!

A toast to Harry the Spider.

He took one for the team, brightened up “Kylie Friday”.

I don’t like looking at someone else “property”.

Phew! That’s not offensive at all then.
For a moment there I was worried you were going to get all mysoginistic. 😀

GrahamS – Member

I don’t like looking at someone else “property”.

Phew! That’s not offensive at all then…

I always thought one of the gender has to be more submissive once they agreed to be with each other … 😆

For a moment there I was worried you were going to get all mysoginistic.

If they are my type and do not belong to someone else then I like them but sometimes they can do my head in … arrghhh … 🙄

What is offensive

1. Chaps admiring an lovely looking lass
2. Chap regarding a woman as used property

Puts PC into perspective don’t it?

If they are my type and do not belong to someone else then I like them……

Lucky girls.