Clearly wrong but any worse than a deliberate two footed tackle?
I don’t think we have to get into degrees of wrongness to just realise that both these things are very, very wrong.
The problem is that sometimes players make heat of the moment decisions when tackling that – particularly in a fast, physical league like the EPL – can result in some pretty savage tackles and injuries. As some will argue, unless we want tackling to disappear from the game, that’s the risk. Already the laws require players to take other players’ safety into consideration, which should mean that the 30/70 type challenges of days gone by should disappear, but at speed and in desperation I’m not sure players have the time to judge what’s reckless / likely to cause injury or not. If they get it wrong, but in the right spirit, they should be sanctioned properly (by a red card and appropriate ban) but that’s where it should stop.
What we do need however is proper review, after the event if necessary, to decide if a tackle was deliberately reckless / dangerous / malicious, or accidentally. At the moment there’s an EPL panel of ex-refs who review decisions – I’d like to extend that and include ex-players who have a better opinion on whether someone has deliberately set out to injure another player. And in those cases; big bans are in order.
Biting (and spitting) are hardly likely to cause career threatening injuries, but then also there’s no scenario where you might be legally gnashing away and ‘accidentally’ make contact with another player. I agree with what others have said, this isn’t the action of a normal player, and he needs help with it, but that doesn’t mean that FIFA shouldn’t absolutely throw the book at him.