Actually reread the BBC article on this.
It says any sale of wood in loads below 2m cubed needs to be at a moisture content of less than 20%.
Actually quite hard to argue with that. Basically what its saying is that log sales of what is sold as seasoned wood need to be seasoned properly by the supplier pulling back the responsibility to the ‘professionals’. Anyone who takes delivery of volumes above 2m cubed of unseasoned wood is still going to get a leaflet telling them how to do it and has more than a passing interest in wood (they are going to need to be able to store a minimum of 4 m cubed – this years already seasoned wood and next years – so you’d have to make some sort of provision that they might. The McMooters of this world.
Thinking about it, I’m struggling to see any downsides. Pains me to say it but got to be a thumbs up from me.
Random aside as someone in the last few months of living down south before I move to the highlands…..much of the wood being sold up there by log providers is softwood from what I can see. A lot cheaper per load than the price in the south downs (roughly a ‘load’ that my mother buys is about the same price I pay for a half load for about three times the volume of wood) but obviously not as energy rich. But is well dried softwood burnt properly (not slumbered etc) more or less environmentally damaging/ sustainable than well managed and burn hard wood? I mainly burn local ash down here which grows quickly for a hardwood but obviously much slower than a spruce. This is in a stove rather than an open fire. I’m pretty sure the scandinavians burn almost only softwoods in their stoves.