I seem to have two bikes which use this benighted head-set – or the Sonder Love Mud equivalent – which is an integrated 45˚ headset, with a 36˚ internal chamfer on the bottom one, ie where it sits on the crown race. The standard bearings are easy-rot steel and the sealing is awful, particularly on the crown race where there isn’t any.
I thought maybe I could fit a standard Hope lower bearing and use the Hope crown race with integrated seal, but it turns out that the Hope bearing is both slightly too large – 52mm v 51.8mm and 1mm too short to fit properly.
But it turns out that you can source stainless steel replacement bearings in the right size, but that still leaves the sealing issue, particularly with the lower bearing / crown race interface. So… I just bought a Cane Creek 110 series crown race with seal and, I think, correct 36˚ angle to go with the standard-szied stainless bearings. I’ve also found a bearing with the same dimensions as the Hope one, but 1mm taller, but it’s not stainless even though it would presumably seal against the Hope crown race.
I don’t know why I’m writing this. Just venting I guess, but how on earth is such a commonly used headset so bloody hard to upgrade without spending £120 on a Chris King Drop-In? And why do brands keep producing frames using this standard?
And is it too much to ask that someone could produce a reasonably priced, widely available, well-sealed, decent quality alternative to the bloody thing?
It’s like a higher tec throwback to the days when bikes always came with crappy, unsealed, ball-bearing head-sets that lasted 20 minutes before seizing solid. Sigh.