I am going to be a dissenter here. Ok a few songs with a little social observation in them and a few acid inspired bits but taken as a whole – derivative trite pop music mainly copied from others – and often direct copies.
Um… no. I’m not even a massive fan of The Beatles, but I do know, from studying music over the years and working in the industry, that almost all of what you say there is nonsense.
I’d do a little bit more reading about them before you make daft statements like the one above. From almost every viewpoint they were innovators. I can think of countless examples of instrumentation, use of the studio as an instrument in itself, and songwriting itself, where they were leagues above anyone else.
Let me quote from Howard Goodall:
‘From a standing start, knowing only a handful of chords between them, John Lennon and Paul McCartney turned themselves into the most influential composers of the late twentieth century. Their music wasn’t just immensely popular. It also proved that traditional western harmony – the main building block of European music – still had plenty to offer. (Even though avant-garde composers had turned their back on it.) By mixing pop and classical techniques, and cross-fertilising them with Indian, and electronic music, The Beatles refreshed and revitalised western harmony. They also transformed the recording studio from a dull box where you recaptured your live sound, into a musical laboratory, of exciting and completely new sounds. This was one of the most crucial advances in the way popular music was to be produced.’
Do I really need to say any more, or are you just trolling?
JP