Home Forums Chat Forum Swear Filter

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 44 total)
  • Swear Filter
  • vinnyeh
    Full Member

    Just checked a list out of curiosity. Gone now.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    This is what I always hoped Simon Bates would do. Warn viewers that VHS I’d just rented contained bad language and then for him to give a list of examples. Maybe over the musical bed for ‘Our Tune’

    1
    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    You need to expand your (swearing) vocabulary. Get a profanisaurus for Christmas.

    Onzadog
    Free Member

    Penistone

    Scunthorpe

    kayak23
    Full Member

    **** drainpipe

    dyna-ti
    Full Member

    It’s complete shite that we have such a thing.

    2
    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    It’s complete shite that we have such a thing.

    😆 It is, but I kind of understand why.  I don’t think Mark and the team are particularly prudish.  As the site relies so much on advertisers, they would probably take a dim view of you lot effing and jeffing and calling everyone Berkley Hunts all the time.  Even if it is warranted! 😉

    dyna-ti
    Full Member

    If you think the STW team are prudish, you should try posting on the ukworkshop forum. There even words like idiot are changed to less provocative words. So for idiot it automatically changes to ‘silly person’

    Shite(without the E is changed to ‘Dung’

    b*****d is changed to ‘Turnip’

    Bu66er is changed to ‘pipper’

    4r5e is changed to ‘buttocks’

    So possibly instead of losing the word to a series of stars, it could be replaced by something like the above.

    1
    Cougar2
    Free Member

    Did the wordlist leak? It’s hilarious reading.

    The point of the swear filter is, it’s a family show. We’re all adults, except we aren’t and there’s kids on here. You wouldn’t walk into Marks & Spencer on a rainy Tuesday and yell “you’re all ****s!!” even if it’s factually correct. You’d present a degree of decorum. If you want a forum where you can call a spade a **** then that’s what Mumsnet is for (or mleh if it still exists).

    thepurist
    Full Member

    So possibly instead of losing the word to a series of stars, it could be replaced by something like the above

    Cougar2
    Free Member

    for idiot it automatically changes to ‘silly person’

    There’s an element of that in the STW filter which exists for little more than comedic value. Easter eggs, if you like.

    tomhoward
    Full Member

    The old MBUK/ bike radar forum was funny for that.

    Splash and Dash off!

    1
    Cougar2
    Free Member

    Huh.

    Either that’s new or I’m about to get a warning for swear filter avoidance.

    2
    bearnecessities
    Full Member

    You wouldn’t walk into Marks & Spencer on a rainy Tuesday and yell “you’re all ****s!!

    And yet we now want to.

    zomg
    Full Member

    It would be nice if subscribers could choose to read unfiltered, but the technical overhead would likely be excessive as I’d hope from a performance point of view that the filter gets applied on post submissions rather than at render-time.

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    Do not attempt to subvert the swear filter, expand your vocabulary instead, thou infectious beetle-headed minnow.

    I bet your dad sells Avon, too.

    Cougar2
    Free Member

    As Billy Connolly said,

    “If there was an alternative to ‘**** off’ I’d gladly use it. It certainly isn’t ‘go away.'”

    Whilst I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment and outwith the forum I swear like a blind cobbler, there is a time and a place for such decorum or absence thereof.

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    As Billy Connolly said,

    “If there was an alternative to ‘**** off’ I’d gladly use it. It certainly isn’t ‘go away.’”

    Also true, was it ‘the Hound’? in game of thones ?

    I’m not sure if this is allowed but:

    [removed]

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Are there really any kids who read the forum! If there are then they deserve to see a lot of **** swearing. What the **** are they doing reading a **** forum full of old **** talking bollocks and arguing about every **** thing ever.

    **** off kids and go hang out with people your own **** age you little bastards.

    4
    zomg
    Full Member

    I do find the serial impotence of the “**** Cancer” threads’ titles darkly amusingly. It’s so stiffly English to not even be able to swear about cancer.

    sirromj
    Full Member

    If you think the STW team are prudish, you should try posting on the ukworkshop forum. There even words like idiot are changed to less provocative words. So for idiot it automatically changes to ‘silly person’

    I’m off there then, see you next time.

    2
    CountZero
    Full Member

    This is what I always hoped Simon Bates would do.

    Well, one thing he did do was enable me to win a trip for two to Los Angeles for a week! Got a tour around Universal Studios along with it, along with a car to drive around the city.

    Before anyone asks, all I had to do was write down the answers to four questions about the film ‘Hackers’ on a postcard, one per day, and send it to an address given on the fifth day. I knew all the answers, and wrote them on the back of a C5 envelope, so giving me a better chance of someone pulling it out of the bag, box, or whatever.
    Best competition prize ever! #smugface

    2
    ads678
    Full Member

    I just wish the swearing filter would put the right amount of stars in. I mean bastard has 8 letters, **** has 6, but ****, **** & **** only 4….

    Edit: ooh bastard is allowed!

    1
    gritmark
    Free Member

    I get these reports from Google every few days. They relate to language used on the forum. I generally just go **** it and don’t even bother checking.

    IMG_4740

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Does Google detect a “violation” if a swear word is typed into a post but isn’t displayed? I’ve assumed that the forum software would handle any sweary stuff so that I could type whatever bollocks I wanted without repercussion but I may have to revise that approach if it’s affecting revenue from ads.

    gritmark
    Free Member

    No. Swear filter removes the word from the database specifically so Google doesn’t index it.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    Cool. Thanks.

    1
    n0b0dy0ftheg0at
    Free Member

    Four forks snake. 😮

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    It would be nice if subscribers could choose to read unfiltered, but the technical overhead would likely be excessive as I’d hope from a performance point of view that the filter gets applied on post submissions rather than at render-time.

    Its been an option on other forums I’ve used.

    Mark
    Full Member

    It’s not technical. It’s financial. See my post above.

    Pyro
    Full Member

    A student web forum I used to use had some practical uses of the swear filter list, specifically targeted at some problematic club members.

    1) Due to one person posting lots of single word text-speak responses, ‘LOL’ got replaced by “I have nothing useful to add to this conversation”

    2) Due to one person’s obsession with cheap roast dinners, ‘Carvery’ got replaced at different times with references to sexual intercourse. “Want to go for a carvery?” then became a long standing in-joke chat up line…

    3) Various people’s nicknames/usernames got subverted at different intervals – mine became ‘Firefly’ at one point (changed by someone who’d forgotten I was an Admin and could also edit the filter list…)

    sl2000
    Full Member

    My most amusing days at work was some time after we’d released some software using a public domain list of words for the spell checker. Someone asked “Did you mean it to do this?” and sent a screenshot with our software helpfully suggesting “muddyfunster”, “muddyfunsters”, “muddyfunsting” as alternatives to her typo. (I’ve swear-filter avoided myself there sorry to convey the humour of the 3 different versions of the rude word suggested). We had a fun afternoon attempting to find all the other naughty words in the word list.

    Houns
    Full Member

    You’re all fluffybunnies

    1
    Cougar2
    Free Member

    It’s so stiffly English to not even be able to swear about cancer.

    The thing is, with my “I used to be a moderator you know” hat on for a moment, give people an inch and they’ll take a parsec. There are those who know exactly where the line is and take great joy in dancing right along the edge of it.

    I just wish the swearing filter would put the right amount of stars in.

    +1, that’s annoyed the piss out of me for years. Like the filter replacement for effing should be ****ing or at least *******, not ****.

    1) Due to one person posting lots of single word text-speak responses, ‘LOL’ got replaced by “I have nothing useful to add to this conversation”

    We have a couple of those also.

    BigJohn
    Full Member

    My best experience of a swear filter was when one of our Thursday night Cannock Chase ride group worked at Wedgwood. Any emails saying “meet tonight at the Barley Mow” would get through. But “meet tonight at Milford Common” got bounced.

    Now that’s what I call a strict filter.

    Cougar2
    Free Member

    I had to deal with a filter misfire one time, years ago. A bit like the Scunthorpe Problem.

    We were getting an absolute buttload of email trapped in the spam filter and no-one could work out why. I eventually tracked it down but it took days (logging was poor). It was objecting to the word “specialist” in job titles in people’s signatures, because it contained “cialis” which is (apparently!) a Viagra-a-like drug.

    sl2000
    Full Member

    I’ve looked in our version control to see what we removed. Wonder which ones are blocked here…

    bullshit
    bullshits
    bullshitted
    bullshitter
    bullshitters
    bullshitting
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    ****
    horseshit
    ****
    ****
    ****
    shat
    shit
    shithead
    shits
    shittier
    shittiest
    shitting
    shitty
    spunk
    spunked
    spunks
    tosser
    tossers

    sl2000
    Full Member

    That’s pretty lax 🙂

    Cougar2
    Free Member

    It looks more ex-lax.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Like the filter replacement for effing should be ****ing

    Not really because that doesn’t distinguish between the widely considered to be offensive English F-word, and the perfectly acceptable Irish F-word, both of which are banned.

    I am mystified how you can’t describe someone as being the TW-word, which is practically a term of endearment imo, and yet you can describe them as being a shithead or a tosser.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 44 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.