Hmm, elephant uplift. I'd pay for that.
If we're wrapping it up, all I can say is yes it's a daft idea, yes it's too much money, but if you look around you you'll find any number of daft ideas that cost too much money that have been huge successes, and for which the exact same objections would apply. I don't disagree at all with the logic but the fact is, these projects do happen. Funicular railways, the entire nevis range project (commissioned during a recession at vast cost), the 7 Stanes themselves (£2 million of public money there), and who knows how many others that you could have shot down for exactly the same reasons. So you take a step back and wonder what's wrong with the picture since your completely logical argument doesn't actually seem to transfer into the real world too well. Some of this stuff just doesn't make sense, is the bottom line, and demanding that it should doesn't work.