Just reading through some old back issues and noted that the Nov ’11 mag included a first look on the BMC Trailfox TF01 Xo.
Looks nice, and a few choice words as a result of the back to back test with the aluminium version.
“Throwing a leg over the TF01 it didn’t take long for us to feel at home”. “The new carbon trailfox is as fast as it looks”. Conclusion, ” its a hell of a lot more fun [than the alloy version]”
Fast forward to April ’12 and the 150mm trail bike shoot out.
Exactly same trailfox. From the review… “From the very first ride it was obvious something was amiss. On bigger hits and g-outs there was a loud wooden knock coming from the rear of the bike”. “It felt like we were riding a carbon time bomb, as it wasn’t a case of if, but when the back end would explode.”
So it turns out there was a mjor flaw with the bike or linkage which struck the carbon seat tube on full compression.
Now I don’t really take mag reviews as gospel (and I aren’t buying a new bike anytime time soon anyway) but what the heck happened here.
How could this be explained.
Was the first look just a ride around the office to size it? Doesn’t sound so and there are photos of offroad riding published.
I can’t believe that something that is seemingly so obvious was completely and utterly missed the first time round.