- This topic has 21,674 replies, 378 voices, and was last updated 5 hours ago by Northwind.
-
Sir! Keir! Starmer!
-
ransosFree Member
Weve left the EU, we’re in a transition, we’re not going back in. Support for a deal is simply engaging with the world as it is.
I assume he’ll be applying his six tests to any deal.
kelvinFull Member33 days ‘till the end of the transition period.
Things Starmer can’t do…
– call for a change to our exit date
– call for PM to rescind A50 notification
– call for extension to transition period
– cancel BrexitAll those opportunities have passed. That those opportunities have passed may well be partly his fault… but they have passed. They are no longer options for the UK. What is possible is avoiding No Deal… in 33 days… and counting…
The six tests are irrelevant now that the only alternative to passing whatever piss poor deal Johnson proposes is no deal on an immovable date.
binnersFull MemberHe could potentially abstain, but the joker in the pack here is how many ERG nutjobs will vote against ANY deal as they always wanted a no-deal crash out anyway
kelvinFull MemberI think he should abstain. But that’s just the … “you broke it, you fix it” … mentality I have about this. Leave the Tories to pick between their two super damaging options. But Starmer taking a different course doesn’t surprise or bother me, really. Should it?
ransosFree MemberAll those opportunities have passed. That those opportunities have passed may well be partly his fault…
Come on. You’re perfectly aware that this is all the fault of he who shall not be named.
piemonsterFull MemberI assume he’ll be applying his six tests to any deal.
Its way too late for any of that to be relevant. Your deal options are whatever Boris presents, nothing else is on the cards.
grumFree MemberCome on. You’re perfectly aware that this is all the fault of he who shall not be named.
Yes it’s important to remember that despite being current Labour leader and Brexit secretary at the time, nothing is Starmer’s responsibility at all.
johnx2Free MemberYes it’s important to remember that despite being current Labour leader and Brexit secretary at the time, nothing is Starmer’s responsibility at all.
Someone else who prefers to say the opposite of what they mean? What do you think Starmer should do now?
kelvinFull Membernothing is Starmer’s responsibility at all
Strawman. Of course he is partly responsible.
Labour has two realistic options now… abstain or support a deal (if a vote even comes before the house this year… I doubt it will). Which should Starmer propose? I think he should have Labour abstaining… but either way, it would make little to no difference as to what happens at the end of the year… so I don’t see it as very exciting whatever he does (or says he would do… all still very hypothetical while Johnson fights the EU over minimum standards … and … er … fish?)
ransosFree MemberStrawman.
You’re right: there’s nothing in this thread to give that impression.
kelvinFull MemberIs that reference to Binners saying someone else carries far more responsibility than Starmer for what happened up and ‘till the start of this year? Because if so… he is obviously right. And CTK is right that a third person carries even more of the responsibility… Starmer falls well below both of those two ex-party leaders if you want to waste effort playing the blame game, it’s not exactly controversial to say so. And then there’s Johnson and Gove…
grumFree MemberIt’s funny that despite being labelled as rabid cultists, ‘the left’ of Labour are mostly able to accept JC turned out to be a crap leader and has made mistakes over AS – whereas according to most on these threads KS can literally do no wrong.
I think he should abstain or let people vote with their conscience – it will likely make no difference anyway. Should have used the whip to oppose the government’s international willy waving defence spending increases though, instead of welcoming it.
kelvinFull Member‘the left’ of Labour are mostly able to accept JC turned out to be a crap leader and has made mistakes over AS
Me.
according to most on these threads KS can literally do no wrong
Not me.
it will likely make no difference anyway
I agree.
johnx2Free Memberaccording to most on these threads KS can literally do no wrong
Most? Say he can literally do no wrong?? I don’t think anyone has said this.
kelvinFull MemberDeputy:
Rayner tells #JLM2020: "I don’t think Jeremy really quite gets how upsetting it is when he made those comments… I really hope that Jeremy really does now reflect on what he said on the day." Concludes: "At the very least I think he should apologise, absolutely."
— Sienna Rodgers (@siennamarla) November 29, 2020
Leader:
"I genuinely thought on the day of the Commission report we could take the next important step of mending the situation… We’ve had to be tough, determined. We’re very conscious of the atmosphere at some CLP meetings at the moment. We're determined to deal with that."
— Sienna Rodgers (@siennamarla) November 29, 2020
kelvinFull MemberFallout from JLM2020 … it looks as if you can’t even call JLM “white supremacists” any more… it’s political correctness gone mad. [final straw that led to Twitter banning the editor of the Canary I believe, as she criticised the deputy and leader for attending using that phrase]
kelvinFull MemberOn Labour having just a thin, ineffective, just about pointless, hobson’s choice in front of them if it comes to a vote on a deal:
At that point, from the very start, well before the referendum, Labour should have made that abundantly clear, and taken a strong, solid, Remain stance. Not one saying the EU is perfect, not emphasising the economy as a whole, but the impact of Brexit on jobs, prices etc. 2/3
— Paul Bernal (@PaulbernalUK) November 29, 2020
P-JayFree MemberI’m trying to figure out what’s up in Labour today.
Is it International Solidarity with Palestine day? If so did Jewish Labour decide to call their one day conference on the same day, forcing Kier to ‘pick a side’ or just a coincidence?
Is it seen to be AS to support Palestine now?
Basically, why level and type of bullshit are we wading through today?
binnersFull MemberI’m sure that with everything being so quiet in this country at the moment, Palestine is at the forefront of everyone’s thoughts.
Can anyone fill me in on what the state of affairs is presently in Venezuela? I’ve not been paying attention as much as I should of late. I know, I know…. but I’ve been busy.
Are there any online petitions I could sign or any retweets I could make to express my solidarity?
The IDF are terrified of retweets expressing solidarity
BillMCFull MemberAll this seems to support the python’s view of the working class
binnersFull MemberYeah **** all them foreigners! 100% agree binbins.
Do you know how much international influence the UK government has on foreign governments at the moment?
None. Zero. We’re a parochial little isolationist, backward-gazing island busy hammering away at our own feet with an ice pick.
Do you know how much international influence the UK opposition party has on foreign governments at the moment?
Even less than zero
But here we are in 2020 and whats the Labour party busy having a dust up over? Israel and Palestine.
Do you think anyone in Israel and Palestine will actually notice?
And while engaged in yet more pointlessly cyclical bickering and vitrue-signalling, there’s actually one or two things going on closer to home that HM opposition might be better concentrating on instead. A global pandemic. Rampant government corruption and incompetence. The impending Brexit economic shitstorm. The most brutal recession this country has ever seen. You know… that type of thing…
grumFree MemberSo you do agree that anti semitism in the labour party isn’t anywhere near as big an issue as has been made out and there are far more important things to worry about. Good to have you on board.
MoreCashThanDashFull MemberSo you do agree that anti semitism in the labour party isn’t anywhere near as big an issue as has been made out and there are far more important things to worry about.
Can’t speak for binners but it seems to me that as Corbyn missed the chance to draw a line under the issue properly, and thus allowed it to drag on, it will have to be ignored, sadly, while more pressing national issues take priority.
A lose/lose for all sides.
squirrelkingFree MemberYeah **** all them foreigners! 100% agree binbins.
Yeah, god forbid you devote those precious seconds to something other than yourself. Of course binners doesn’t think of anyone BUT himself so, you know, it’s hard for him to get to grips with the concept.
exseeFree MemberIt’s all the Labour party can talk about though..
Must not mention brexit
Must not discuss a vision for the future
Must not mention JC
No plan for the PandemicThe ultimate smash and grab victory will be eeeezeee if they just learn to zip it for 3 years👍
ctkFree MemberLOL doubling down on the **** all foreigners then binbins?! Jesus wept.
ransosFree MemberAnd while engaged in yet more pointlessly cyclical bickering and vitrue-signalling
I suppose, given that you’ve championed insular, selfish politics, it’s not surprising that you’ve also adopted its language.
binnersFull MemberI suppose, given that you’ve championed insular, selfish politics
And where exactly have I done that?
I’m merely posing the question of how it looks to most voters when a party trying to establish itself as a serious contender for government is endlessly wanging on about Palestine while we’re in the middle of a massive global pandemic, there’s rampant government corruption and incompetence and the small matter of the huge looming recession and mass unemployment on the horizon, with a disastrous Brexit adding to the chaos
You’d think, given how pressing these issues are for the country, that those on the left may temporarily park their favourite hobby-horses to concentrate on more pertinent affairs
But no…
Public displays of solidarity it must be.
ransosFree MemberAnd where exactly have I done that?
Several people think you have on this page. But I’m fully aware that you’re not one for self-reflection and expect you to self-entrench further into little-Englander politics, while telling yourself it’s about something slightly less ignoble.
binnersFull MemberSeveral people think you have on this page.
Well if several people think it then it must be correct then.
Far be it from me to have an opinion that differs from the committee
johnx2Free MemberSeveral people think you have on this page.
That’s it case closed?
I see something presumably criticising Monty Python, for some reason; a link to a correspondence criticising the IHRA definition for saying that “claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour” is an example of antisemitism, amongst other things. And someone saying that antisemitism in the labour party is less of a big issue than other, er, issues. And others hiding so far behind sarcasm I’m hard pushed to work out what it is they’re trying to articulate. Like that guy in Father Ted, you know the one. Must find a gif.
Okay, no gifs but here’s a pic: Father Jessup,
the most sarcastic priest in Ireland, from Kicking Bishop Brennan Up The Arse
.
dazhFull Memberendlessly wanging on about Palestine
The main reason I care about Palestine is after a very good lifelong friend once did some work in Ramallah about 15 years ago. He worked for a human rights organisation and previously had spent time in Sri Lanka and Sierra Leone and had seen some pretty harrowing stuff. Then he went to Palestine, where his driver and security guards told him stories of their family members who were murdered by the IDF. Some of them kids who were shot whilst in the playground. Now I can’t verify any of the stories he told me, and he couldn’t either, but I know him well enough to believe that he believed what he was told. He came back from Ramallah with a bad case of PTSD and never really recovered. So yeah, I’ll keep ‘wanging on’ about Palestine, because at the end of the day we’re talking about kids and innocent people being murdered by an unaccountable military and government, under the full glare of an international community which doesn’t seem to care.
binnersFull MemberNobody is disputing how unremittingly awful the situation has been for decades. Its absolutely horrendous. As is Syria and Libya and Afghanistan and plenty of other places
Thats not the point
Do you know how much Benjamin Netanyahu cares about the opinion of the leader of the labour party in the UK?
I doubt he even knows who he is.
My point is that the labour party should be committing its efforts to things it can actually influence, maybe some of the enormous challenges presently facing the country, not wasting its energies on things completely beyond its control over which it can exert zero influence
MoreCashThanDashFull MemberI think this is demonstrating beautifully the problem the Labour movement faces – an idealogical side where everything matters and tackling them all as a matter of principle is a “higher calling” that can’t be compromised, and another pragmatic side that just wants to get into government and start fixing what it can, right here, right now and will get to the rest later.
Unless the two sides can agree on a common enemy to fight, rather than each other, Boris will be laughing!
mrmonkfingerFree Memberand another pragmatic side that just wants to get into government and start fixing what it can
The current opposition are unencumbered by even the second part of that.
Labour absolutely have to unite to present a useful, credible, opposition.
Even then, with the burdens of wanting to do things about half right, it will be difficult.
faddaFull MemberWell put, MCTD – encapsulates why I’m so depressed about all this infighting…
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.